Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 29
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
lokeycmos (43)


Next birthdays
05/24 Simon Barsinister (63)
05/27 Daniel Davis (54)
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Carbon Arc Lamp

Move Thread LAN_403
teravolt
Fri Apr 15 2011, 01:43AM
teravolt Registered Member #195 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
when I made a arc lamp I used a container of salt water with two electrodes in series with the line and my corbon rods in air. they will get hot enough to melt anyting.
Back to top
GluD
Fri Apr 15 2011, 10:30AM
GluD Registered Member #1221 Joined: Wed Jan 09 2008, 06:17PM
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 196
Hello Steve and welcome to the forum smile

- what inspired you to build a carbon arc lamp?

First I was just playing around with a TV flyback in the "vacuum chamber" if I can even call it that, then I moved on to MOTS for more power, and then I got the idea of using moveable electrodes and very high currents. So it wasnt really just an idea that came to me out of the sky, it was more like a natural move in my series of "experiments", an increase in power and thus plasma temperature. The main interest at first was to obeserve the plasma (mot and flyback arcs) at variable pressures, but then after I'd done that it sort of developed into a quest for pumping in as much power as I could (thats about where it became a carbon arc lamp).

For the last many months I have been working on and off with the new version, it should be done in a few months hopefully. It will feature alot of improvements, although it will still just be an iron tube as I dont have the tools to manufacture a proper vacuum chamber.

When the new one is done Im hoping to play around with various lenses and other optical stuff.
Back to top
steve516
Fri Apr 15 2011, 04:30PM
steve516 Registered Member #3832 Joined: Thu Apr 14 2011, 11:57PM
Location: Downtown Chicago, IL
Posts: 37
GluD wrote ...

When the new one is done Im hoping to play around with various lenses and other optical stuff.

Would definitely be interested in seeing pictures, etc. when your done with it. Look at the lenses for some modern HMI "fresnel" lights, these can really do wonders to almost any light if you know what you're doing!

I've always been sort of a light junkie- in fact, one of the coolest things I have done is take a 1.2kw HMI, run it without a lens/ diffuser, so just bare bulb at a pane of glass 20 feet away, and just watch the glass shatter. Beautiful what that amount of light can do.

I wouldn't put it past your carbon arc lamp if you can tweak it enough. It's all about getting enough "quantity" of light/ photons per unit area and amazing things will certainly ensue.

Thanks for the warm welcome as well. Look forward to spending a lot of time on this forum.
SK
Back to top
James
Fri Apr 15 2011, 10:50PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
Most carbon arc lamps run with just air at atmospheric pressure. While HID lamps have taken over in most fields, there are still carbon arc cinema projectors and follow spots in operation. Typically the reflector has a hole in it and one electrode pokes through the hole while another sits out in front on a movable sled. Normally there is a motorized or solenoid driven mechanism to automatically feed the rod as the electrodes are consumed. The one I remember looking at up close was a Peerless Magnarc, I think they were quite common.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Apr 15 2011, 11:19PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
teravolt wrote ...

when I made a arc lamp I used a container of salt water with two electrodes in series with the line and my corbon rods in air. they will get hot enough to melt anyting.

If I remember correctly, some theatres used to have drums of saltwater backstage, and the lights were 'dimmed' by raising the electrodes from the drums, thus increasing resistance.
Back to top
GluD
Sat Apr 16 2011, 01:13PM
GluD Registered Member #1221 Joined: Wed Jan 09 2008, 06:17PM
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 196
Look at the lenses for some modern HMI "fresnel" lights, these can really do wonders to almost any light if you know what you're doing!

I abseloutely don't know what I'm doing, but I am hoping to improve on that.


Most carbon arc lamps run with just air at atmospheric pressure.

Yes, I have read a little about arc lamps, and this really sort of suprised me. Wouldn't there be synthesized alot of carbon oxides (CO2 or CO whichever is more favourable), I would think that the actual 'burning' of the electrodes in the air would significantly speed up the rate at which the electrodes are consumed?

An inert atmosphere such as the one I attempt to sustain in my device using argon, should limit the electrode losses to only vaporization as there is no oxygen to support combustion.
Maybe the atmospherfic designs are more effecient because they give off more light as the electrodes burn with the oxygen, but I like to be able to control the pressure so I am very please with my choice although it may not be the way it is usually done.
Back to top
James
Mon Apr 18 2011, 08:51PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
The electrodes are consumed fairly quickly, as I recall they are enough for just a couple spools of film, A large duct connected to an exhaust fan extracts the vapors and provides cooling.

There are some old manuals for various cinema and stage equipment here Link2

The one for the Peerless lamphouse like I was looking at is here Link2

An inert atmosphere does prolong the life of the carbons, but this can be obtained just by restricting the flow of air into the lamphouse. The oxygen already in there is consumed by the arc, leaving a mix of inert gasses. This was used in a lot of the later carbon arc light fixtures used for streetlighting and interior illumination of department stores and such until they were replaced by incandescent lamps in the early 1900s.
Back to top
Nah
Wed Apr 20 2011, 12:17AM
Nah Registered Member #3567 Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
I think you have to look at it from cost.

Which costs less

1. Replacing giant pencil leads every week
2. Buying a vacuum pump, buying gas, makign sure there wans't an explosion because of the low preasure, and paying to keep the pump running.
Back to top
GluD
Wed Apr 20 2011, 11:55AM
GluD Registered Member #1221 Joined: Wed Jan 09 2008, 06:17PM
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 196
I think you have to look at it from cost.

This is not a comercial venture, it is just me trying to amuse myself with various(perhaps over-complicated) devices. Being able to control the pressure significantly improves that in my opinion, and it is after all I whom shall be operation this thing cheesey

I already have the Argon and the vacuum pump, so it is only the useage that will cost me anything, wear and tear on the pump and of course some electricity and some Argon, but Argon barely cost anything at all. Although the bottle is rather expensive but as I said, I already have it.

I could also ask which cost less

Watch some lame show on TV like the rest of the country
or
Build something interesting and perhaps more complicated than it may have to be.
The easiest and cheapest is not always the best choice. It depends on what the purpose is, here the purpose is to amuse myself, and for that the TV just will not do.
I could also just draw arcs with two piece of carbon in air but that wont do either.

It is sort of like asking a guy who is building a huge DRSSTC why he didnt just make a small cheap SGTC instead.


Also now I come to think about it, being able to control the pressure could prove to be a significant advantage if I get serious with my optical experiements later on. I read in some of the papers James posted eariler that, on the old theatre equipment you had to adjust some chimney thingy until the arc stabilised. In my devices here I will 'adjust' the pressure, if nessecary, until the arc too are stabilised.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.