If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #195
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 08:27PM
Location: Berkeley, ca.
Posts: 1111
when I made a arc lamp I used a container of salt water with two electrodes in series with the line and my corbon rods in air. they will get hot enough to melt anyting.
Registered Member #1221
Joined: Wed Jan 09 2008, 06:17PM
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 196
Hello Steve and welcome to the forum
- what inspired you to build a carbon arc lamp?
First I was just playing around with a TV flyback in the "vacuum chamber" if I can even call it that, then I moved on to MOTS for more power, and then I got the idea of using moveable electrodes and very high currents. So it wasnt really just an idea that came to me out of the sky, it was more like a natural move in my series of "experiments", an increase in power and thus plasma temperature. The main interest at first was to obeserve the plasma (mot and flyback arcs) at variable pressures, but then after I'd done that it sort of developed into a quest for pumping in as much power as I could (thats about where it became a carbon arc lamp).
For the last many months I have been working on and off with the new version, it should be done in a few months hopefully. It will feature alot of improvements, although it will still just be an iron tube as I dont have the tools to manufacture a proper vacuum chamber.
When the new one is done Im hoping to play around with various lenses and other optical stuff.
Registered Member #3832
Joined: Thu Apr 14 2011, 11:57PM
Location: Downtown Chicago, IL
Posts: 37
GluD wrote ...
When the new one is done Im hoping to play around with various lenses and other optical stuff.
Would definitely be interested in seeing pictures, etc. when your done with it. Look at the lenses for some modern HMI "fresnel" lights, these can really do wonders to almost any light if you know what you're doing!
I've always been sort of a light junkie- in fact, one of the coolest things I have done is take a 1.2kw HMI, run it without a lens/ diffuser, so just bare bulb at a pane of glass 20 feet away, and just watch the glass shatter. Beautiful what that amount of light can do.
I wouldn't put it past your carbon arc lamp if you can tweak it enough. It's all about getting enough "quantity" of light/ photons per unit area and amazing things will certainly ensue.
Thanks for the warm welcome as well. Look forward to spending a lot of time on this forum. SK
Registered Member #3610
Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
Most carbon arc lamps run with just air at atmospheric pressure. While HID lamps have taken over in most fields, there are still carbon arc cinema projectors and follow spots in operation. Typically the reflector has a hole in it and one electrode pokes through the hole while another sits out in front on a movable sled. Normally there is a motorized or solenoid driven mechanism to automatically feed the rod as the electrodes are consumed. The one I remember looking at up close was a Peerless Magnarc, I think they were quite common.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
teravolt wrote ...
when I made a arc lamp I used a container of salt water with two electrodes in series with the line and my corbon rods in air. they will get hot enough to melt anyting.
If I remember correctly, some theatres used to have drums of saltwater backstage, and the lights were 'dimmed' by raising the electrodes from the drums, thus increasing resistance.
Registered Member #1221
Joined: Wed Jan 09 2008, 06:17PM
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 196
Look at the lenses for some modern HMI "fresnel" lights, these can really do wonders to almost any light if you know what you're doing!
I abseloutely don't know what I'm doing, but I am hoping to improve on that.
Most carbon arc lamps run with just air at atmospheric pressure.
Yes, I have read a little about arc lamps, and this really sort of suprised me. Wouldn't there be synthesized alot of carbon oxides (CO2 or CO whichever is more favourable), I would think that the actual 'burning' of the electrodes in the air would significantly speed up the rate at which the electrodes are consumed?
An inert atmosphere such as the one I attempt to sustain in my device using argon, should limit the electrode losses to only vaporization as there is no oxygen to support combustion. Maybe the atmospherfic designs are more effecient because they give off more light as the electrodes burn with the oxygen, but I like to be able to control the pressure so I am very please with my choice although it may not be the way it is usually done.
Registered Member #3610
Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
The electrodes are consumed fairly quickly, as I recall they are enough for just a couple spools of film, A large duct connected to an exhaust fan extracts the vapors and provides cooling.
There are some old manuals for various cinema and stage equipment here
The one for the Peerless lamphouse like I was looking at is here
An inert atmosphere does prolong the life of the carbons, but this can be obtained just by restricting the flow of air into the lamphouse. The oxygen already in there is consumed by the arc, leaving a mix of inert gasses. This was used in a lot of the later carbon arc light fixtures used for streetlighting and interior illumination of department stores and such until they were replaced by incandescent lamps in the early 1900s.
Registered Member #3567
Joined: Mon Jan 03 2011, 10:49PM
Location: USA, 1960s
Posts: 260
I think you have to look at it from cost.
Which costs less
1. Replacing giant pencil leads every week 2. Buying a vacuum pump, buying gas, makign sure there wans't an explosion because of the low preasure, and paying to keep the pump running.
Registered Member #1221
Joined: Wed Jan 09 2008, 06:17PM
Location: Odense, Denmark
Posts: 196
I think you have to look at it from cost.
This is not a comercial venture, it is just me trying to amuse myself with various(perhaps over-complicated) devices. Being able to control the pressure significantly improves that in my opinion, and it is after all I whom shall be operation this thing
I already have the Argon and the vacuum pump, so it is only the useage that will cost me anything, wear and tear on the pump and of course some electricity and some Argon, but Argon barely cost anything at all. Although the bottle is rather expensive but as I said, I already have it.
I could also ask which cost less
Watch some lame show on TV like the rest of the country or Build something interesting and perhaps more complicated than it may have to be. The easiest and cheapest is not always the best choice. It depends on what the purpose is, here the purpose is to amuse myself, and for that the TV just will not do. I could also just draw arcs with two piece of carbon in air but that wont do either.
It is sort of like asking a guy who is building a huge DRSSTC why he didnt just make a small cheap SGTC instead.
Also now I come to think about it, being able to control the pressure could prove to be a significant advantage if I get serious with my optical experiements later on. I read in some of the papers James posted eariler that, on the old theatre equipment you had to adjust some chimney thingy until the arc stabilised. In my devices here I will 'adjust' the pressure, if nessecary, until the arc too are stabilised.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.