If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #509
Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 07:02AM
Location:
Posts: 329
Makes sense, since a square wave would just be all the odd harmonics. But given that our eye only covers 400-800Thz (roughly) it'd be difficult to see the 2nd harmonic in anything other then deep red light, as your harmonics would be getting deeper and deeper into the UV region
Registered Member #3766
Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location:
Posts: 624
To add to this, whats the difference between electromagnetic radiation released from an antenna and electromagnetic radiation from an LED? since LED's give off light one photon at a time, and antennas broadcast continuously?
Registered Member #1792
Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
It's the same, all EM radiation from radio waves to light waves is both a particle and a wave. The particle nature of radiation helps explain certain things like the photoelectric effect and single photon interference. But most stuff can be well described by the wave perspective. Photons are being emitted, but there are so many of them that the quantized nature isn't significant (under typical radio conditions).
Hyperphysics has a nice description of the dual nature:
Registered Member #2901
Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
It behaves like both a particle and a wave at some level of understanding of particles and wave behaviours.
Although it's mostly an artefact of the way we learn physics ... it's easier for us to think in terms of particles than in term of quantization effects (which are just plain unintuitive, you'd almost start thinking the universe is just a massive FEM simulation).
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, according to Douglas Adams, it is, and it's run by mice.
wrote ... Although often mistaken for a planet, Earth is in reality the greatest supercomputer of all time, designed by the second greatest supercomputer of all time, Deep Thought, to calculate the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe And Everything (to which the answer is 42).
Registered Member #2463
Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
It just might be the most of our universe is composed of stuff that that has no electrons. It is quite easy for a hydrogen atom to lose the only one it has.
Things that have electrons, seem to be able to see other things similarly endowed.
But is always is easier to find what you seek under the lamp post in the dark, isn't it?
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
radiotech wrote ...
It just might be the most of our universe is composed of stuff that that has no electrons. It is quite easy for a hydrogen atom to lose the only one it has.
Things that have electrons, seem to be able to see other things similarly endowed.
But is always is easier to find what you seek under the lamp post in the dark, isn't it?
Try googling 'electric cocmos' or 'electric universe'.
While some of it might seem to border on pseudoscience, there is a lot there that makes a lot of sense, but you may need to dig a bit to find it..
If all EM waves can only be created by the acceleration of charges, what then would the acceleration of the charge be, that produced a square EM wave?
I'm not sure that is even possible, considering the field magnitude would peak as the charge's acceleration peaks. So with a square wave, the charge would have to have a near instant change in position to maximize the slope of the increasing E field.
How does one so quickly bump an electron, and then bring it to such a short halt again?
Registered Member #3637
Joined: Fri Jan 21 2011, 11:07PM
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1068
Meatball wrote ...
If all EM waves can only be created by the acceleration of charges, what then would the acceleration of the charge be, that produced a square EM wave?
I'm not sure that is even possible, considering the field magnitude would peak as the charge's acceleration peaks. So with a square wave, the charge would have to have a near instant change in position to maximize the slope of the increasing E field.
How does one so quickly bump an electron, and then bring it to such a short halt again?
Easy. Bump it forward, then bump it backwards again with a bump of equal magnitude.
Registered Member #2901
Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
wrote ...
If all EM waves can only be created by the acceleration of charges, what then would the acceleration of the charge be, that produced a square EM wave?
Can't be done ... a square EM wave is actually just a summation of coherent light of different wavelengths, the electron can only emit one photon at a time.
I think you're misunderstanding the bit about acceleration. Now I have a purely conceptual understanding of QM, because I'm far too lazy to do all the math ... but AFAICS it's not the vibration of the electron which generates the EM, it's the quantum leap from one velocity to another which generates the photon (in essence the velocity step is stochastic and thus generates a photon of random wavelength, but the wavefronts of acceleration/deceleration set up in the antenna cause amplified stimulated emission ... antennas have a lot in common with lasers).
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.