Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 81
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Daniel Davis (54)


Next birthdays
05/29 Zonalklism (34)
05/29 Dr Hankenstein (68)
05/30 Quantum Singularity (47)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Radiation
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

I was thinking...

first  3 4 5 6 
Move Thread LAN_403
ConKbot of Doom
Mon May 16 2011, 02:02PM
ConKbot of Doom Registered Member #509 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 07:02AM
Location:
Posts: 329
Makes sense, since a square wave would just be all the odd harmonics. But given that our eye only covers 400-800Thz (roughly) it'd be difficult to see the 2nd harmonic in anything other then deep red light, as your harmonics would be getting deeper and deeper into the UV region
Back to top
magnet18
Tue May 17 2011, 01:35AM
magnet18 Registered Member #3766 Joined: Sun Mar 20 2011, 05:39AM
Location: 1307912312 3766 FT117575 Indiana State
Posts: 624
To add to this, whats the difference between electromagnetic radiation released from an antenna and electromagnetic radiation from an LED?
since LED's give off light one photon at a time, and antennas broadcast continuously?
Back to top
Mattski
Tue May 17 2011, 02:58AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
It's the same, all EM radiation from radio waves to light waves is both a particle and a wave. The particle nature of radiation helps explain certain things like the photoelectric effect and single photon interference. But most stuff can be well described by the wave perspective. Photons are being emitted, but there are so many of them that the quantized nature isn't significant (under typical radio conditions).

Hyperphysics has a nice description of the dual nature: Link2
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Tue May 17 2011, 10:08AM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
It behaves like both a particle and a wave at some level of understanding of particles and wave behaviours.

Although it's mostly an artefact of the way we learn physics ... it's easier for us to think in terms of particles than in term of quantization effects (which are just plain unintuitive, you'd almost start thinking the universe is just a massive FEM simulation).
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed May 18 2011, 09:20AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, according to Douglas Adams, it is, and it's run by mice.

wrote ...
Although often mistaken for a planet, Earth is in reality the greatest supercomputer of all time, designed by the second greatest supercomputer of all time, Deep Thought, to calculate the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe And Everything (to which the answer is 42).
Back to top
radiotech
Thu May 19 2011, 08:59PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
It just might be the most of our universe is composed
of stuff that that has no electrons. It is quite easy for a hydrogen
atom to lose the only one it has.

Things that have electrons, seem to be able to see other
things similarly endowed.

But is always is easier to find what you seek under the lamp post
in the dark, isn't it?

Back to top
Ash Small
Sun May 22 2011, 01:56PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
radiotech wrote ...

It just might be the most of our universe is composed
of stuff that that has no electrons. It is quite easy for a hydrogen
atom to lose the only one it has.

Things that have electrons, seem to be able to see other
things similarly endowed.

But is always is easier to find what you seek under the lamp post
in the dark, isn't it?




Try googling 'electric cocmos' or 'electric universe'.

While some of it might seem to border on pseudoscience, there is a lot there that makes a lot of sense, but you may need to dig a bit to find it..
Back to top
Meatball
Wed May 25 2011, 12:46AM
Meatball Registered Member #2401 Joined: Mon Sept 28 2009, 04:25PM
Location:
Posts: 74
If all EM waves can only be created by the acceleration of charges, what then would the acceleration of the charge be, that produced a square EM wave?

I'm not sure that is even possible, considering the field magnitude would peak as the charge's acceleration peaks. So with a square wave, the charge would have to have a near instant change in position to maximize the slope of the increasing E field.

How does one so quickly bump an electron, and then bring it to such a short halt again?
Back to top
Inducktion
Wed May 25 2011, 01:00AM
Inducktion Registered Member #3637 Joined: Fri Jan 21 2011, 11:07PM
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1068
Meatball wrote ...

If all EM waves can only be created by the acceleration of charges, what then would the acceleration of the charge be, that produced a square EM wave?

I'm not sure that is even possible, considering the field magnitude would peak as the charge's acceleration peaks. So with a square wave, the charge would have to have a near instant change in position to maximize the slope of the increasing E field.

How does one so quickly bump an electron, and then bring it to such a short halt again?

Easy. Bump it forward, then bump it backwards again with a bump of equal magnitude.
Back to top
Pinky's Brain
Wed May 25 2011, 02:19AM
Pinky's Brain Registered Member #2901 Joined: Thu Jun 03 2010, 01:25PM
Location:
Posts: 837
wrote ...

If all EM waves can only be created by the acceleration of charges, what then would the acceleration of the charge be, that produced a square EM wave?
Can't be done ... a square EM wave is actually just a summation of coherent light of different wavelengths, the electron can only emit one photon at a time.

I think you're misunderstanding the bit about acceleration. Now I have a purely conceptual understanding of QM, because I'm far too lazy to do all the math ... but AFAICS it's not the vibration of the electron which generates the EM, it's the quantum leap from one velocity to another which generates the photon (in essence the velocity step is stochastic and thus generates a photon of random wavelength, but the wavefronts of acceleration/deceleration set up in the antenna cause amplified stimulated emission ... antennas have a lot in common with lasers).
Back to top
first  3 4 5 6 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.