Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 103
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Download (31)
ScottH (37)


Next birthdays
11/03 Electroguy (94)
11/04 nitromarsjipan (2024)
11/04 mb (31)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

i need another opinion on energy of flight...

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
...
Mon Nov 29 2010, 07:22AM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
It has been touched upon before, but it needs to be further emphasized:
note - I use energy loosely to refer to work/power done on the system, with the assumption that you understand power is the time derivative of work, and that energy is what allows you to do work.
The power, from a 'strictly physics--all energy must be conserved' standpoint is 0. The only time you need energy is to change the height or velocity of your vehicle.
You must generate a force equal/opposite to that of gravity, so for your 1kg vehicle you need 9.8N of force. The key thing to remember is that all of the physics equations define work as force times distance, so if if your vehicle is stationary it, by definition, cannot be using any energy.


However, from a practical standpoint, generating that 9.8N of force will take some amount of energy! Impractical implementations aside (you never said that you can't just set another earth sized mass on the other side of it to generate your force, but it would be an unstable equilibrium anyway so lets not worry about such cases), it is going to take some energy. At this point you consider your 'force generator' with more scrutiny, and calculate its 'thrust efficiency' in terms of watts in to force out. It is my understanding that ducted fans are the most efficient at ~1 N/W for very high performance fans, with typical RC gear putting out closer to 0.2N/W
Back to top
BigBad
Mon Dec 06 2010, 02:55AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Nah. It doesn't take any energy at all.

For example if you have a huge flat plate of graphite (weighing 1kg) resting on a huge flat plate of neodymium magnet!
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Dec 06 2010, 03:37AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
BigBad wrote ...

Nah. It doesn't take any energy at all.

For example if you have a huge flat plate of graphite (weighing 1kg) resting on a huge flat plate of neodymium magnet!

yes, but your body did the work against gravity to get the graphite plate above the magnet. the magent is a stationary force "generator" which is cool but useless for an aircraft or spacecraft .
Back to top
BigBad
Sun Dec 19 2010, 06:23AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Yes, raising something up against gravity does take energy, in strict accordance with conservation of energy!

But so what? The levitation itself takes no energy. The answer to your original question is 0 joules/second/kg is the minimum you need, and this isn't a limit case, it's routinely achieved.
Back to top
Patrick
Sun Dec 19 2010, 06:44AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
maybe, but accelerating air eats E. and levitating by air jet, must consume energy.
Back to top
Bjørn
Sun Dec 19 2010, 08:21AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
The limit would be an infinite large propulsion unit with finite mass pushing on an infinite amount of air. That should give you levitation with no energy use.

It is unclear what you are really trying to caculate. If you want a real world value you don't calculate, you look up an existing fan unit and get your values from there, then you buy one and double check the numbers.
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.