Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 27
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
EEYORE (42)
TeslaJunky (32)


Next birthdays
07/16 Gavin (49)
07/16 Froskoy (33)
07/16 UnHappy1 (59)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Audio Amplifier ICs

Move Thread LAN_403
Steve Conner
Fri Feb 06 2009, 11:27AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
There are reasons why IC amplifiers are limited in power. A high power linear amp needs a lot of silicon area, and it gets uneconomical to integrate that onto one huge die.

It's also hard to make an IC withstand the high voltages needed for high power into 4 or 8 ohm loads. (Hence, Harry's suggestion won't work, because he won't find an IC that'll produce enough voltage swing to drive the output stage. Unless he were to use an output stage with gain greater than 1.)

And lastly, the heat from the power section of the die tends to destabilize the small-signal circuits. In a discrete amp you can put the input transistors right at the other end of the board to the heatsink.

The highest power IC I know of is the TDA7293. Marshall made a 350 watt guitar amp, the MF350, using four of these in bridge/parallel. These amps seem to be unreliable and blow out their TDA7293s regularly.

Compare that to the old 400 watt power amp circuit used by Peavey, with six TO-3 power transistors on a huge heatsink. They made a lot of these in the 70s and most of them seem to still be going.

If you can find lateral MOSFETs (it doesn't work with the ordinary SMPS kind) then the old Hitachi/Maplin MOSFET amp is still worth considering. It's about the simplest discrete power amp you can possibly make, and good for about 120W into 4 ohms.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Feb 06 2009, 12:00PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Steve McConner wrote ...

It's also hard to make an IC withstand the high voltages needed for high power into 4 or 8 ohm loads. (Hence, Harry's suggestion won't work, because he won't find an IC that'll produce enough voltage swing to drive the output stage. Unless he were to use an output stage with gain greater than 1.)

I don't quite follow why you couldn't use an inter-stage transformer which would isolate beneficially the two stages, as well transforming impedances and voltages. Being an idle fellow, as a first start I'd probably try an ordinary AF O/P transformer in reverse, or one of the combinations possible with those multi-tap AF line transformers - but, as I said, I don't really think in a solid state way. My head may be Hollow State too! smile

Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Feb 06 2009, 12:57PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, you could do that, it worked for Thomas Vox in the 70s: Link2

I once experimented with a hybrid amp that used a push-pull transistor output stage, driven through a step-down transformer by an EL84. I got over 50 watts out of it, which must be some sort of record for one EL84 wink

But I think all of this complicates things unnecessarily, compared to the classic three-stage discrete amp.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Fri Feb 06 2009, 01:30PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Yes, Steve, perhaps it does create complication - but it seemed a way to conserve all of the gadgets and gimmicks on a consumer PA IC, yet still have a simple high power output stage.
Back to top
KLH
Fri Feb 06 2009, 02:09PM
KLH Registered Member #1819 Joined: Thu Nov 20 2008, 04:05PM
Location:
Posts: 137
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) wrote ...

I have most of the DIY audio amp books, including the two by Slone and so far his first project doesn't really work that well. Not only that but you have to have some equipment to tweak-in the amp when you build it from components, and the expense far outweighs anything you can consider at the moment.
Ordinarily, getting a current mirror to work properly is no concern, but when you are trying to guarantee a clean output to the voltage amplifier stage and gain, its more like an experiment then anything else.

1. Don't bother with discrete unless you need bandwidths greater then 30KHz.

2. If you're prepaired to waste a lot of time debugging something someone else designed... maybe wrong.

3. If you really understand component selection ( I still have trouble with this)

4. If you have equipment to tweak it in

5. I have a little push pull class B amp here with 100W transistors that can only push 20W at the moment, and I expect it will be a lot of work to get it to output more.

So consider the time spent vs. the money spent, spending the money may be saving you a lot.

I don't understand what you mean by "tweaking it in". Do you mean calibrating something such as quiescent current? This depends on the specific design of the amplifier.

By the way, it might be SOA or thermal derating limiting your 100W transistors.

Harry wrote ...
I don't quite follow why you couldn't use an inter-stage transformer which would isolate beneficially the two stages, as well transforming impedances and voltages. Being an idle fellow, as a first start I'd probably try an ordinary AF O/P transformer in reverse, or one of the combinations possible with those multi-tap AF line transformers - but, as I said, I don't really think in a solid state way. My head may be Hollow State too! smile

Signal transformers that can handle the whole 20 to 20 kHz frequency range are expensive, often costing $50 for a tiny transformer. Although I'm not too sure if that kind of transformer is what you're talking about.
Back to top
101111
Fri Feb 06 2009, 02:41PM
101111 Registered Member #575 Joined: Sun Mar 11 2007, 04:00AM
Location: Norway
Posts: 263
I would go for the LM3886 or if you want power go for LM4780. LM4780 consist of two LM3886 these chips are well proven and used in many Hi-Fi audiophile projects. I am currently using a tube buffered LM4780 in dual mono configuration. A LM4780 can drive two speakers at 8ohm 64 watt stereo or one single 8ohm at 128. For 4ohm impedances remember that you will need lover voltages and and bigger heat sinks.
Back to top
TwoSpoons
Mon Feb 09 2009, 02:20AM
TwoSpoons Registered Member #1621 Joined: Tue Aug 05 2008, 05:26AM
Location:
Posts: 19
go check out Link2 Theres a whole section on chip amps. With 4x LM3886 you can build a bridge/parallel amp that will do close to 200W into 4 ohms
Back to top
Nikhil
Mon Feb 09 2009, 04:31PM
Nikhil Registered Member #1751 Joined: Fri Oct 10 2008, 03:16PM
Location: India
Posts: 16
How do i modify the chip amp ckt so as to suit a sub woofer or a tweeter ?
Back to top
101111
Mon Feb 09 2009, 05:18PM
101111 Registered Member #575 Joined: Sun Mar 11 2007, 04:00AM
Location: Norway
Posts: 263
Nikhil wrote ...

How do i modify the chip amp ckt so as to suit a sub woofer or a tweeter ?

With a crossover filter before or after the chip amp, if the speaker already have a built-in crossover filter you should be okay without any configuration.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.