Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 16
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
a.gutzeit (63)


Next birthdays
05/08 wpk5008 (34)
05/09 Alfons (36)
05/09 Coronafix (51)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

testing circuit that keeps blowing mosfets

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
IamSmooth
Sat Oct 05 2019, 04:23PM Print
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I'm working on a project that occasionally causes me to exceed the current limitations of a mosfet's current (40A). Are there any simple techniques to protect the mosfet from this happening?

I've considered using a variable DC power supply with a fixed maximum current of say 20A. I've thought of using some fastblow fuses, but I don't think they would work fast enough.

Any suggestions?

Back to top
2Spoons
Sun Oct 06 2019, 09:33AM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
IamSmooth wrote ...


I've considered using a variable DC power supply with a fixed maximum current of say 20A.

This is your best bet. So long as to don't have a lot of C in there too.

Fuses are useless. Fuses are for massive over-current faults, by which time your silicon is already toast.

Back to top
Adrenaline
Mon Oct 07 2019, 03:14PM
Adrenaline Registered Member #235 Joined: Wed Feb 22 2006, 04:59PM
Location:
Posts: 80
2Spoons wrote ...




Fuses are useless. Fuses are for massive over-current faults, by which time your silicon is already toast.

That isn't true. You just have to make sure your I2T of your fuse is less than that of the device you want to protect.

Back to top
2Spoons
Mon Oct 07 2019, 09:21PM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
Adrenaline wrote ...

You just have to make sure your I2T of your fuse is less than that of the device you want to protect.

Try " a lot less" - fuses are not precision devices. The trip current also varies with temperature. Which means using grossly over-rated silicon if you don't want your fuse to pop in normal operation.
An electronic current limiter is a much better option.

Back to top
IamSmooth
Mon Oct 07 2019, 11:11PM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
I've looked at the I2t of fuses. If I read the chart correctly, a 20A fast blow has a trip time of about 0.1s if the current is 40A. This is not a lot of time for a semiconductor.

I've decided to get a variable power supply to limit the current during my testing phase.
Back to top
Adrenaline
Tue Oct 08 2019, 01:09PM
Adrenaline Registered Member #235 Joined: Wed Feb 22 2006, 04:59PM
Location:
Posts: 80
Yes, for this use case using current limiting is the way to do it.

My point was fuses can and do protect silicon, in sort circuit conditions.
Back to top
Patrick
Tue Oct 08 2019, 05:40PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
I would use pulse by pulse current limiting if possible. With modern ICs its much easier than in past years, and you can use a loop homemade current transformer or un-ravel the nichrome on a high watt cement resistor. Low power loss through heating either way.

The fuses' slow thermal inertia may cause problems with the ultra low mass semiconductor's high speed inertia.

I have a thread somewhere with about 8 pages of discussion on your very issue.

Current limiting unlike fusing can be used as a diagnostic tool, which surprised me. It can indicate short, open, shoot through under varying loads and saturation with a oscilloscope.
Back to top
IamSmooth
Tue Oct 08 2019, 10:42PM
IamSmooth Registered Member #190 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 12:00AM
Location:
Posts: 1567
Patrick, any way you can find that thread and post a link to it here?
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Oct 09 2019, 06:45AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Link2
Link2

Unfortunately the pics dont work. But the UC 280XX or similar is the key. you dont need to setup the whole circuit. you can spoof everything except transistor gate drive, current limit and timing cycle. in this there was another IC i used that linearly rolled back the duty cycle. cant remember.

Im wishing there were a large cache of pics we could sift through. Im sure there are threads ill never see again. I have 5,400 pics going back 12+ years, theyre on 4 different computers and only 3% or so are cropped and fit for posting on the interwebs.
Back to top
klugesmith
Wed Oct 09 2019, 09:20PM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1714
IamSmooth wrote ...

I've looked at the I2t of fuses. If I read the chart correctly, a 20A fast blow has a trip time of about 0.1s if the current is 40A. This is not a lot of time for a semiconductor.

Agreed, and it can be similarly revealing to look at I2t numbers for the semiconductors. Or infer it from half-cycle-at-power-frequency specs.

I think 20A circuit breakers in household panels are supposed to conduct 40A for about a minute.
Of course they trip as fast as they can in event of a short circuit (>> 1000 A).
The logarithmic delay-vs-overcurrent charts span many decades, and are not constant I2T.

Can anyone tell us about the time delay control mechanisms? Maybe the answers are on the Internet.
Thermal methods (bimetal parts that move)?
Hydraulic mechanisms (solenoid plungers with viscous damping)?
Decades ago, one brand became notorious for failing to trip under a condition where they needed to trip.


Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.