Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 11
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
cbfull (52)
Steve Ward (39)


Next birthdays
05/20 Vaxian (17)
05/21 Dalus (34)
05/21 Kizmo (37)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Need help with current limiting.

Move Thread LAN_403
hen918
Fri Jan 08 2016, 01:51PM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
Patrick wrote ...

Connected to what value resistor ? I used a voltage divder but I guess at the values.

Connected to a similar circuit described above, like the one in this drawing Link2 remembering pin 9 on the drawing is pin 3 on your IC.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Jan 08 2016, 09:07PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
like this ?
1452287278 2431 FT174221 New



EDIT: Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooo yeah

Ive got it working, I put 10k ohms where Hen918 suggested.

4.6uS @ 5.1 volts

14.4uS @ 2.8 volts

Vref = 5.1 volts

It does vary linearly with the turn of the potentiometer. Now I need to pick some exact values, and really get the design formalized for a new etch.




EDIT:
pics
1452295953 2431 FT1630 10

1452295953 2431 FT1630 50

1452295953 2431 FT1630 100





EDIT: It appears when I put 1.3 volts on pin 9 ( ILM/SD ) the PWM pins, both drop to zero. so I guess I don't know what "pulse-by-pulse current limiting" means.


Edit : ill be using the IGBT :
]hgtg7n60a4d.pdf[/file] and switching 170 Vdc through the primary, at no more than 4 amps.



Back to top
hen918
Sat Jan 09 2016, 11:58AM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
The control loop of the current limiting is causing it to drop the pwm to 0: When you apply over one volt, the controller drops the pwm, and keeps dropping it until the current voltage goes below 1 volt. If you are keeping the voltage at 1.3V, the controller will rapidly drop the pulse width all the way to zero until the over current voltage is dropped.
Back to top
DerAlbi
Sat Jan 09 2016, 02:15PM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Hmmmmh. IGBT @ 170V ?

Supose your 4A is the peak current. If the current was rectangular then you IGBT will have Vcesat(4A)=1.8V. What loss in a Mosfet equates to 450mOhm Rsdon. This is quite bad.
If you assume a triangular current waveform the Mosfet is even better due to quadratic dependence on the current instead of nearly linear like the IGBT.

Looking at Digikey, Searching for Single Mosfets, "Vds>200V", "Ids>6A", "Rsdon < 400mOhm" and "THT" then entering the quantity of "1" and sorting for price you get a variety of alternatives that seem so much more suited for your project.....
I case you cant follow my parametric search, then i just name a few:
FQP19N20C (94ct, 170mOhm, 200V, 19A, TO220)
RCX200N20 (110ct, 130mOhm, 200V, 20A, TO220)
FDP18N20F (114ct, 145mOhm, 200V, 18A, TO220)
STF20N20 (120ct, 125mOhm, 200V, 18A, TO220)
FDP39N20 (132ct, 66mOhm, 200V, 39A, TO220)
FDP33N25 (144ct, 94mOhm, 250V, 33A, To220)
..List continues. I just picked the ones that are much more better than your IGBT. (since i only searched for Rsdon<450mOhm.. should have searched for Rsdon<150mOhm)
Back to top
Patrick
Sat Jan 09 2016, 06:32PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
DerAlbi wrote ...

Hmmmmh. IGBT @ 170V ?

Supose your 4A is the peak current. If the current was rectangular then you IGBT will have Vcesat(4A)=1.8V. What loss in a Mosfet equates to 450mOhm Rsdon. This is quite bad.
If you assume a triangular current waveform the Mosfet is even better due to quadratic dependence on the current instead of nearly linear like the IGBT.

Looking at Digikey, Searching for Single Mosfets, "Vds>200V", "Ids>6A", "Rsdon < 400mOhm" and "THT" then entering the quantity of "1" and sorting for price you get a variety of alternatives that seem so much more suited for your project.....
I case you cant follow my parametric search, then i just name a few:
FQP19N20C (94ct, 170mOhm, 200V, 19A, TO220)
RCX200N20 (110ct, 130mOhm, 200V, 20A, TO220)
FDP18N20F (114ct, 145mOhm, 200V, 18A, TO220)
STF20N20 (120ct, 125mOhm, 200V, 18A, TO220)
FDP39N20 (132ct, 66mOhm, 200V, 39A, TO220)
FDP33N25 (144ct, 94mOhm, 250V, 33A, To220)
..List continues. I just picked the ones that are much more better than your IGBT. (since i only searched for Rsdon<450mOhm.. should have searched for Rsdon<150mOhm)

I figured someone would say this. smile I just used the 7 amp and 30 amp versions since I have 30 of one and 40 of the other. there is a really good MOSFET I used at 30 volts and less. Which eventually this power supply will work off of at 12-18 volts input at 20+ amps.



EDIT: The voltage varies linearly from 0 - 0.7 after .7 it jumps to 1.25 V. below the .7 the PWM is off entirely. above the 1.25 its on.
I also have to keep the pin 9 below 5 volts or it will blow out.
Back to top
Patrick
Sun Jan 10 2016, 09:43PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
I'm moving on to optical feedback of the regulated voltage crossing the isolation barrier. I need to show you guys some PDF's.


PC911L0YSZ - - >

PS2561-1 - - >

SFH6345 - - >

HCPL 7520 - - >
Back to top
DerAlbi
Mon Jan 11 2016, 12:42AM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
For an analog loop you should avoid PushPull-Outputstages like the PC911L0YSZ. Easy solutions like the PS2561-1 is fine. You could try it with SFH6345 , but i dont see much reason there. HCPL7520 is surely interesting.. but i honestly think its overkill.
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Jan 11 2016, 01:00AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Here's the PDF's . . . still considering what DerAlbi has said.











Ive seen those analog loops a thousand times, but don't know how to design one. I did talk to Uzzors a while ago, he said they were easy.
Back to top
DerAlbi
Mon Jan 11 2016, 01:20AM
DerAlbi Registered Member #2906 Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Actually they are quite complex if you want to get them right. It is however easy to get something working. It depends on what kind of control loop you want to implement. If its kind of digital like "start switching" when voltage is low or "stop switchting" when voltage is high enough then its easy. but its most likely inefficient, produces high ripple under constant load conditions and... yeah.. its basically nothing else than a most primitive over voltage protection.
A real analog loop also controls how much energy is transfered when switching. Such a loop can be too slow to be optimal, produce overshoots if too fast or it even can oscillate.
Its in no way trivial, but often it just works somehow (most likely when its made really slow). As long as you dont care to make it optimal, its can be easy.

Thats why i propose the PS2561-1.
The Push-Pull-Output has too much loop-gain (making it digital oscillating). The SFH6345 just adds complexity to the loop and the HCPL7520 might even have not enough gain. Just try.
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Jan 11 2016, 01:50AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Ok I, looking for shcematics then. I don't know if I need a voltage reference or not. or if a zener will work.



1452491448 2431 FT1630 S2009724972776


Keep in mind I don't know anything about poles or zeros. I don't have a TL431 either.



]tnd381-d.pdf[/file]



Link2

Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.