Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 19
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Linas (34)
Toasty (29)


Next birthdays
05/16 kg7bz (68)
05/16 steve516 (31)
05/17 Finn Hammer (72)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Solar Powered Flight.

Move Thread LAN_403
hen918
Tue Jul 03 2018, 11:16AM
hen918 Registered Member #11591 Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
wrote ...

...
2Spoons wrote ...

Er - those two boards do completely different things, so its not clear what you are trying to achieve.
Yes they are different but i dont know which to use.
Both.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Jul 03 2018, 12:17PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
IMO a very simple system can be implemented, for various reasons:

A suitable number of series solar cells connect via a diode to the required (e.g. 3) number of lithium cells,
no charge regulation is required as the maximum charging current is determined by light level,
and the voltage is 'clamped' by the cells/battery.
The esc (with under-voltage inhibit) can connect directly to the battery.
Over the time frame and number of charge/recharge cycles likely, cell imbalance can be ignored,
provided that all cells start with similar charge levels.
Back to top
Carbon_Rod
Tue Jul 03 2018, 12:26PM
Carbon_Rod Registered Member #65 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
Lithium cell voltage drop during discharge is somewhat load dependent, but many LiIon/LiPol managers simply ignore the <40% depleted battery Constant Current mode part of the charging cycle.

In general, as the ESC drivers are running directly off the charger-bypass/current-protection circuit (3 or 4 cells), they can avoid the cost/weight of power conditioning that can only make it less efficient. Thus, the energy conversion rating is good if the parts are sized appropriately to keep the dissipated energy losses to a minimum.

Has anyone tried a split power rail system before... like 2 latching relays?

Mode 1: MPPT Charging cycle i
Charging or Resting 1/2 capacity bank A (3S 1.2Ah)
Using 1/2 capacity bank B (3S 1.2Ah)
Bank B Maintaining control logic capacity for bank C (A/B step-down to C with 2S 600mAh)

Mode 2: MPPT Charging cycle ii
Using 1/2 capacity bank A
Charging or Resting 1/2 capacity bank B
Bank A Maintaining control logic capacity for bank C

Mode 3: Performance climb
Using 1/2 capacity bank A
Using 1/2 capacity bank B
Bank A+B Maintaining control logic capacity for bank C

Mode 3: Glide mode
Maintaining 1/2 capacity bank A
Maintaining 1/2 capacity bank B
Bank A+B Maintaining control logic capacity for bank C

Mode 4: Dump mode
Toggle between Mode 1 and Mode 2 every 5 minutes.
Bank A+B Maintaining control logic capacity for bank C

If you want to build something that stays aloft a longtime, than you need to restrict your MPPT charge managers to maintain 1 C (and size your craft around these LiPol properties). In this example, that is 1200mAh * 1Cbatt = 1.2A charge rate at the battery, and thus very inexpensive to find. The solar array should simply be wired in such a way where the charging voltages are always above the minimum charger input voltages, as most are setup in a buck configuration (a 24v to 12v drop is probably >86% efficient).

Recall that LiPol have a Constant Current and Constant Voltage mode in a charging cycle, and will remain in the Constant Voltage mode if the bank never drops below 66% capacity. Thus, ideal for variable solar power input for both the MPPT chargers, and maybe a way to get around that 1 Cbatt charge rate limit.

For bank C, which is only really used to power logic during switch over and brown-outs... it is simpler as the fully charged primary bank A/B should always meet the input requirements:
Link2

To stay running, lets say that:
Given a 1.3m wing Skywalker Falcon can manage over 30 minutes with a 2.2Ah 3S Cell...
Each bank would need to be rated to supply minimally 2.2Ah per hour, as the solar charger would need to be able to maintain the 2.2Ah average top-off charge rate (in CV) while the other bank was being depleted.
Thus, the air frame relative to the above would need to be able to manage >1.4kg loads (a large 3m wing span), and only run a 800-900kv undersized motor on average.

I am sure if you play around with the numbers there may be a fair compromise someplace, but I suspect going larger actually only makes the problem more difficult.
wink
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.