Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 41
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
05/11 ramses (16)
05/11 Arcstarter (31)
05/11 Zak (15)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Half-Bridge Coilgun Exploding Rectifier Problem...

Move Thread LAN_403
maruiwlt
Thu Dec 13 2012, 11:48PM Print
maruiwlt Registered Member #859 Joined: Mon Jun 25 2007, 10:23PM
Location:
Posts: 11
Hello all, I'm working on a half-bridge coilgun and have gotten it to fire safely at <200 volts, but at 300volts the rectifiers that should be recovering the back emf are exploding.

They are UF1007 ultra fast rectifier diodes. I'm quite certain that it isn't the recovery speed since it is as fast as the UF4007 which is common in half-bridge coilgun designs.

I've come across a few schematics that put multiple rectifiers in parallel. Is this something I should try?

Back to top
2Spoons
Fri Dec 14 2012, 02:24AM
2Spoons Registered Member #2939 Joined: Fri Jun 25 2010, 04:25AM
Location:
Posts: 615
From the datasheet

Non-Repetitive Peak Forward Surge Current :8.3ms Single half sine-wave Superimposed on Rated Load : 30 A

Are you exceeding this?

I would always change to bigger diodes before running multiple diodes in parallel.


Back to top
maruiwlt
Fri Dec 14 2012, 02:44AM
maruiwlt Registered Member #859 Joined: Mon Jun 25 2007, 10:23PM
Location:
Posts: 11
Ah that's probably it... I have a few 1n5407 diodes that are rated to 200A surge but are not ultra-fast types.

Do you know what the recovery time affects in a circuit like this? I'm assuming the slower switching time will cause the inductor to build up a higher voltage while current isn't flowing. Then the diode or IGBT may explode due do the spike... lose/lose I guess :/

I don't have time to order new diodes so I'll try to parallel a few uf1007's first. Better to have those explode again than a voltage spike destroying my IGBTs.

Thanks!
Back to top
Yandersen
Fri Dec 14 2012, 03:12AM
Yandersen Registered Member #6944 Joined: Fri Sept 28 2012, 04:54PM
Location: Canada
Posts: 340
No matter which diode you will use, there will be no spike. Switching time is a time for diode to close when polarity inverses (yes, it is still conductive for some periode of time even being in inverse direction, and the higher the current was the longer the diode will keep it's doors open). This characteristic should be minimum for diodes used in switching-type power converters applications. For half-bridge it doesn't make any difference. Use slow strong ones.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Dec 14 2012, 07:46AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Yandersen wrote ...

No matter which diode you will use, there will be no spike. Switching time is a time for diode to close when polarity inverses (yes, it is still conductive for some periode of time even being in inverse direction, and the higher the current was the longer the diode will keep it's doors open). This characteristic should be minimum for diodes used in switching-type power converters applications. For half-bridge it doesn't make any difference. Use slow strong ones.

You are talking about reverse recovery time here aren't you, Yan? Would schottky diodes be a better alternative here, as they have no reverse recovery time?

EDIT: Having re-read your post, I think you are saying that the switching time isn't what is causing them to explode, it's the current rating that is causing them to explode.
Back to top
Yandersen
Fri Dec 14 2012, 08:06AM
Yandersen Registered Member #6944 Joined: Fri Sept 28 2012, 04:54PM
Location: Canada
Posts: 340
Schottky will be good. I doubt it has no recovery time though, but it doesn't matter in this application.

Of course it is overrated current - do you believe that they got scared of HV that much? :))
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Dec 14 2012, 09:36AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Yandersen wrote ...

Schottky will be good. I doubt it has no recovery time though, but it doesn't matter in this application.

Of course it is overrated current - do you believe that they got scared of HV that much? :))

Yes, I'd assume it is too much current. I was on my first coffee this morning after a phone call woke me up, so wasn't really with it, although I don't really understand what happens when diodes reverse-conduct while there is a charge carrier depletion region at the junction (all that 'charge carrier and holes' stuff never really made much sense to me. I do struggle with understanding how semi-conductors actually work, but never had a problem understanding valve (vacuum tube) technology, or any other particle physics, for that matter. I'ts just the NPN-PNP stuff that baffles me.)
Back to top
Yandersen
Fri Dec 14 2012, 07:13PM
Yandersen Registered Member #6944 Joined: Fri Sept 28 2012, 04:54PM
Location: Canada
Posts: 340
Don't worry, neither I understand it that deep. I just read datasheets to know the characteristics and wikiing what it means. :)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.