Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 22
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
GODSFUSION (37)
Zajcek (37)
ElectroDog (33)
sportcoupe (56)


Next birthdays
04/29 GODSFUSION (37)
04/29 Zajcek (37)
04/29 ElectroDog (33)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Electromagnetic Projectile Accelerators
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Particle(beam) weapon

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
KV3000
Sat Jul 29 2006, 04:48PM Print
KV3000 Registered Member #100 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:52PM
Location: Austria
Posts: 9
Hi,

I don´t know if this is the right forum to discuss, but I´d like to know if its possibile to built such a particle(beam) weapon like in stargate or all the other scifi films.
I know that a plasma can be accelerated through an electric field, but the weapons in the film seems different.
Is there any other way to accellerate particle bursts or of creating a particle beam?

Greets KV3000
Back to top
FastMHz
Sat Jul 29 2006, 05:39PM
FastMHz Registered Member #179 Joined: Thu Feb 16 2006, 02:08AM
Location: Hagerstown, Maryland - Close to Prime Outlets
Posts: 287
I just saw on Science Channel a clip about some uni students who built a prototype nuclear engine where the nuclear energy excites neon gas to turn it to a plasma and then accelerates it out the back. It's certainly not like the weapons in sci-fi as it is only enough energy to slowly accelerate a body in space...but the "exhaust" it technically a particle beam.
Back to top
Marko
Sat Jul 29 2006, 09:04PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
KV3000 wrote ...

Hi,

I don´t know if this is the right forum to discuss, but I´d like to know if its possibile to built such a particle(beam) weapon like in stargate or all the other scifi films.
I know that a plasma can be accelerated through an electric field, but the weapons in the film seems different.
Is there any other way to accellerate particle bursts or of creating a particle beam?

Greets KV3000


Plasma will disperse and cool immediatelly after it has been ''fired'', andfaster it is fired it will disperse more, especially in air atmosphere and etc.

Proposals for accelerating small number of particles to relativistic speeds (with huge particle accelerators) also suffers from similar problems (atmosphere, scattering) and would require insane amounts of energy to accomplish something

There are couple of good articles in wikipedia about problems with practical use of such.

Link2
Link2
Link2 ('possibility of ''plasma rifles'' in real world)
Back to top
Sulaiman
Sat Jul 29 2006, 09:49PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
In the '70s I worked on an accelerator that produced electrons at reletavistic velocities
acceleration was by 80 MW of microwaves in a vacuum.
The beam exited via a thin titanium window and would travel several feet through the air.

During research for this project we came across information about a USSR accelerator
Incredible!

Helium nucleii were accelerated by microwave in an evacuated tube
The amazing thing was that they used massive vacuum pumps and NO window
The pumps produced near vacuum at the sealed end with the other end open
(a high energy alpha beam would destroy any 'window')
I have no documents or proof, but this device it was claimed could
cut the wings off an aeroplane in flight at over 11 km.
The downside was - it was built atached to a nuclear reactor for power supply.
Neither portable nor covert.
Anyone heard of it?
Back to top
Marko
Sat Jul 29 2006, 10:06PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Helium nucleii were accelerated by microwave in an evacuated tube
The amazing thing was that they used massive vacuum pumps and NO window
The pumps produced near vacuum at the sealed end with the other end open
(a high energy alpha beam would destroy any 'window')


Reminds on tesla's famous 'death ray' proposal...

Link2

I have no documents or proof, but this device it was claimed could
cut the wings off an aeroplane in flight at over 11 km.
The downside was - it was built atached to a nuclear reactor for power supply.
Neither portable nor covert.
Anyone heard of it?


And that sounds like all that crap linked with the thing over ages.

Alpha particles could hardly travel over some significant distance trough air.
And even if they do I doubt there would be any superheating effect, but rather just strong radiation...
Back to top
KV3000
Sun Jul 30 2006, 10:39AM
KV3000 Registered Member #100 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:52PM
Location: Austria
Posts: 9
Yeah, that sounds really like tesla´s death rays.
Plasma will disperse and cool immediatelly after it has been ''fired'', andfaster it is fired it will disperse more, especially in air atmosphere and etc.

I know; when I tried to launch a plasma-spark with my coilgun I got the same result.
Maybe that problem can be fixed in some time: My ideas were to produce the plasma in a teflon bullet and prevent the plasma so from dispersing for some time or to compress the plasma that its surface is small enough to cut through air.

What about the lauching methode? Is am EM-field the best way to launch a plasma or a particle beam?

I know I´m freaky but I like Scifi and if it´s possibile I´d like to built such a particle(beam) weapon (just for fun).


KV3000
Back to top
Madgyver
Sun Jul 30 2006, 10:58AM
Madgyver Registered Member #177 Joined: Wed Feb 15 2006, 02:16PM
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 214
What about heavy particles like Fe Ions in cosmic radiation?
Back to top
Bjørn
Sun Jul 30 2006, 11:59AM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
The most energetic particles in cosmic radiation has enough energy to kill a person but they never reach the ground. They will hit an air molecule very quickly and convert into a shower of different particles over a large area.

For those that want to experiment, try using a TW UV laser to blast an tunnel through the air before deploying the particle accellerator.
Back to top
dan
Sun Jul 30 2006, 12:32PM
dan Registered Member #223 Joined: Mon Feb 20 2006, 06:42PM
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 125
Ha.. After firing a TeraWatt laser there really isn't much use of firing a high energy particle accelerator after it down the same path. I mean everything in its path would have been obliterated by the first pulse. but I guess that’s your point.
Back to top
Marko
Sun Jul 30 2006, 12:52PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Except interesting way to deploy accelerated particles there doesn't seem to be much else of tesla's work.
Some of his claims look pretty silly and it is questionable was he sane at all at the time.

The most energetic particles in cosmic radiation has enough energy to kill a person but they never reach the ground. They will hit an air molecule very quickly and convert into a shower of different particles over a large area.


'OMG particles' Link2 are some of such crazy protons seeming even to defy famous Zatsepin-Kuzmin limit.
I don't know if it would actually generate enough radiation to kill somebody, but it concludes that even a big bunch of such particles couldn't travel too far trough air.

For those that want to experiment, try using a TW UV laser to blast an tunnel through the air before deploying the particle accellerator.


I don't think that any kind of laser could 'evatuate' air from it's path. It could ionise, heat up and rarify it but there would still be enough atoms to weaken our death beam (maybe your TW laser wouldn't even leave much of a target in for it)

If I had such a laser (actually 2 of them) I would rather channel HV trough ionised air Link2
It could make a neat non-lethal weapon if we could pack up a big GW UV laser inside something size of rifle or bazooka. neutral

You can ask TDU how hard is air ionisation actually to acheive with laser over a considerable distance...

I know; when I tried to launch a plasma-spark with my coilgun I got the same result.
Maybe that problem can be fixed in some time: My ideas were to produce the plasma in a teflon bullet and prevent the plasma so from dispersing for some time or to compress the plasma that its surface is small enough to cut through air.



One helping thing may be shaping plasma into toroidal rotating vortex wich would stop the dispersing, but plasma would anyway cool down in a fraction of second. I think wikipedia also mentions this somewhere.

Tesladownunder on site Link2 tried to make ''ball lightning'' using this technique and it seems that he got some small vortexes of plasma travelling for few meters as maximum, and it was very hard to notice trough all the flash and bang made by 18kj cap bank.

It was accelerated by simple thermal expansion of air inside the cavity.

One could probably use some kind of accelerator to increase it's speed, maybe some kind of 'coilgun' or etc.
Anyway range won't get much more than meters, adn I don't even think that such a vortex would cause anything more than a puff of warm air to target...










Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.