Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 13
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
11/27 Dax (42)
11/27 Mino (49)
11/29 Sonic (58)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Charge Leakage and measuring Voltage with an Electroscope

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
Antonio
Tue Oct 19 2010, 10:10PM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
The "FET electrometer" in the book above can be used to detect polarity or to sense the presence of a strong electric field, but is useless for quantitative measurements because the charge in the gate leaks too fast. The foil electroscope as shown is a common error in modern texts, and will not work well in this way. The foil just bent and suspended is too stiff for reasonable sensitivity, and the electroscope mounted inside an insulating plastic pot will charge the interior of the pot quickly, and the foils will not close if the electroscope is discharged. In a correct assembly the bottom of the pot must be conductive, and the side walls shall have strips of metal to drain stray charges. Here is one that works well:
Link2
Back to top
ThereIsNoSky
Wed Oct 20 2010, 12:08AM
ThereIsNoSky Registered Member #2423 Joined: Tue Oct 06 2009, 02:49AM
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 10
Patrick wrote ...

ThereIsNoSky wrote ...

@Patrick - I would prefer to make direct measurements on the circuit. My current plan is to put an inductor or resistor in series between the cap and ground. This will give me a very good low resistance Earth ground for my HV DC coupling on the electrostatic field. Then I would like to measure the voltage across the inductor or resistor to see any E-Field interactions. Do you think this will work? As my E-field is affected by other E-fields this should induce a small(?) voltage rise or dip across the capacitor. This change will then be measured by a scope on the inductor / (small value) resistor without draining any of the charge off of the HV side of the capacitor.
oh, man you've asked a very complicated question. i think you will have problems using a 1M/or 10M ohms scope impedenace. the resistor or inductor you describe should really be considered a antenna and its physical shape may matter a whole lot for intercepting any givin signal/field. and close, low field changes will be detected as the same as a far, High field. at least for a detector single antenna intercept type devcie.

Patrick, I think you have hit the nail on the head here. I would like to pick up any small and near Efield influences as well as any large and far Efield influences. The ability to distinguish them is not important to me. I would just like to be able to measure them. This is for fun and knowledge. I can't speak to any 'quack medical' detectors. What is the purpose of this is like saying, "What is the purpose of a TC?" <-- Sacrilege, I know...

Also, you are correct in chastising my use of "Amplified Noise". I think a better word choice maybe would have been "exaggerated noise".

As Efield's interact, charge is displaced. The larger and more intense the Efield, the more severely the charge is displaced. If the charge is displaced on one side of a Capacitor it will generate a voltage dip or rise across the capacitor. This small change should be able to be measured in the form of current through a small value resistor on the other side of a capacitor. Since I am producing a larger Efield, I am assuming I am going to get a Larger voltage across my cap/resistor.
Is any of the above not correct?

I am attaching a jpg of EXACTLY what I would like to do.

1287532544 2423 FT98837 Efieldsystem

Additional thoughts are to replace the resistor with an inductor or put the resistor on the HV side. As you can see the Electroscope is merely verifying that I haven't bled down the voltage on my system. As stated earlier, charging will currently be accomplished by a computer monitor attached through a diode string. Crude, but simple.

Once again, I would like to reiterate my appreciation for the participation I am getting in this thread.
-NoSky
Back to top
Antonio
Wed Oct 20 2010, 12:58AM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
Your meter connected in this way will only measure the leakage through corona at the antenna. With the capacitor charged and no corona the measurement will be zero.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Oct 20 2010, 12:54PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
E-fields don't "interact" with each other unless they're in a nonlinear medium.

I work for a company that makes partial discharge (corona for you Americans :) ) detection equipment for the power industry. When you're working in a 400kV substation, you can shake a bunch of keys and our RF detector will register huge amounts of RF. In fact some of our field guys got in the habit of using that to test that the detector is working.

But this is because your keys are a nonlinear medium: they get charged by the huge E-field of the substation's overhead busbars, and tiny sparks jump between them as you jingle them around. The sparks are the non-linearity that converts the power frequency field to RF.

Another way that E-fields can detect "influences" is: If charged objects are moved around, this changes the capacitance between them. If the total quantity of charge is kept constant (say the objects are insulated) then the change in capacitance results in a change of voltage. This is how the condenser microphone works: the tiny movements of the diaphragm are converted to an electrical signal. In the same way, a sensitive electrometer can detect you walking around the room because of whatever static charge happens to be on you. It can also detect charged clouds, raindrops and all sorts of other fun things.
Back to top
Antonio
Wed Oct 20 2010, 10:54PM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
Something that can be made with an antenna connected to a charged capacitor and something to measure the current through the capacitor is a movement detector. Something moving close to the antenna will change the distributed capacitance C of the antenna, that is charged to a voltage V, and a current V dC/dt will flow through the charged capacitor. The sensitivity of the device is proportional to V.
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.