Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 37
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Seperate circuits

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
ScotchTapeLord
Wed Sept 01 2010, 01:29AM
ScotchTapeLord Registered Member #1875 Joined: Sun Dec 21 2008, 06:36PM
Location:
Posts: 635
It would be a much bigger project to build an inverter, but if you did, you could make an H-bridge, rewire the primary to take 12v in, and add a resonant capacitor to the primary to keep the current sinusoidal.

I say just wire the breakers in parallel and put fuses on every wire coming out of the wall. Monitor the current coming from each line, and if they're too unbalanced, compensate by adding extension cords to the one drawing more current until it evens out. Dirty, but it'll get the job done! Or at least, in theory it should.
Back to top
Adam Munich
Wed Sept 01 2010, 01:34AM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
"In theory" the atomic bomb was supposed to be a peaceful weapon...
Back to top
Patrick
Wed Sept 01 2010, 01:42AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Grenadier wrote ...

"In theory" the atomic bomb was supposed to be a peaceful weapon...
"In theory" MOTs were supposed to run microwave ovens. wink
Back to top
Crunchy Frog
Wed Sept 01 2010, 03:00AM
Crunchy Frog Registered Member #2422 Joined: Tue Oct 06 2009, 02:41AM
Location:
Posts: 85
Patrick wrote ...

Grenadier wrote ...

"In theory" the atomic bomb was supposed to be a peaceful weapon...
"In theory" MOTs were supposed to run microwave ovens. wink

Well said
Back to top
Adam Munich
Wed Sept 01 2010, 03:41AM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
Well I just plugged an NST into my 400W non-sinusoidal inverter. It worked fine, though it sounded different. Sounded a lot like a triangle wave.
Back to top
klugesmith
Wed Sept 01 2010, 03:59AM
klugesmith Registered Member #2099 Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
ScotchTapeLord wrote ...
I say just wire the breakers in parallel and put fuses on every wire coming out of the wall. Monitor the current coming from each line, and if they're too unbalanced, compensate by adding extension cords to the one drawing more current until it evens out. Dirty, but it'll get the job done! Or at least, in theory it should.
It's much simpler to return to original concept: connect each MOT primary between hot and neutral of a separate circuit. Make no connection between the two circuits, except both grounding (green) wires are hardwired to both MOT cores, which is the common point of series-connected HV windings.

The two secondary currents will be equal, for any load connected between the two HV terminals.
The two primary currents will be equal, to the extent that the MOT's are physically matched.

This is cleaner and safer than a hardwired parallel connection, but still can back-drive house wiring if one breaker is open AND there is a load between the HV terminals. So as STL said, plug nothing else into either circuit. Then (with this configuration) if one breaker trips, the associated MOT primary current will be zero (unless you have a capacitor across it). Then that MOT's secondary will present a huge magnetizing inductance, immediately and greatly reducing the current in, say, an arc.

Patrick wrote:
>>for best safety i think you would need isolation transformers, that would solve at least your holding tripped circuits high. but for your wattage they would be big.

How would isolation transformers change the voltage back-driven onto a tripped circuit?

Back to top
Patrick
Wed Sept 01 2010, 04:59AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Klugesmith wrote ...

Patrick wrote:
>>for best safety i think you would need isolation transformers, that would solve at least your holding tripped circuits high. but for your wattage they would be big.

How would isolation transformers change the voltage back-driven onto a tripped circuit?

well, i was thinking its the arc that holds the wires at higher potential powering the 'should be' de-energized circuits. i was thinking too much maybe? any way maybe im wrong about that.

EDIT: Kludgesmith, your right, the isolation idea wont work, my bad.

But i have a better idea: use a double ganged breaker, with that pin that joins the two poles if one trips they both get thrown. At least you wont have an unbalanced current load causing immeadiate tripping of one and delayed tripping of the other. As, large current fuses are expensive.

also, this would be so much easier with a useful 240 socket / line, is there any possiblity of fixing that nail prroblem?
Back to top
radiotech
Wed Sept 01 2010, 07:06AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Patric wrote: i was thinking its the arc that holds the wires at higher potential powering the 'should be' de-energized circuits.

It gets a little involved here: If you analyse the case of an arc being sustained when one of the breakers trips, and the arc holds up
from the other transformer through the tripped one's secondary whose reflected reactance is through any other loads that may have been on that tripped branch circuit, you will see that at the moment it trips the now phanthom powered circuit experiences an instantaneous polarity reversal, and that circuit voltage fall after after the trip would be twice the rms value or 240 volts for one cycle.and there after reversed in phase what it was before.
This because the primaries although intended to be paralleled, because of the mot's grounded high side on the secondary, have to be connected opposite in polarity to get twice the voltage at the outside winding terminal.
If the hookup was on a split 120/240 volt pair of outlets then
the tripped leg would be fed same phase as before, except through a very noisy source at the load end rather from the source end.

Back to top
Patrick
Wed Sept 01 2010, 12:29PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
radiotech wrote ...

It gets a little involved here...

as soon as i tried to simulate this situation, and i realized that reactance plays a significant role, i knew this was a lot more complicated then at first it would seem.
Back to top
radiotech
Wed Sept 01 2010, 04:30PM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
That scenario happens in grids when lines get crossed in storms and here is a relay that can detect which way the "power" is flowing, which is not always clear in an AC circuits.



The advent of the MOT on the experimenter scene has changed the playing field in that fauilts of 1000 Joules at several thousand volts can be launched back in home wiring systems. This is not a problem in a new structures wired with up to date codes but in older marginal ones with loose connections (especially at outlets connected with quik-con terminals (the push-in type), sooner or later a fire might result.

1283358634 2463 FT95563 Scan0002
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.