Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 56
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

New Tesla Coil - Capacitor advice

 1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Xplorer
Fri Aug 06 2010, 08:21AM
Xplorer Registered Member #2416 Joined: Sun Oct 04 2009, 04:23AM
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 91
Truth be told, I've already got it built and running. I built it when I was 16 and it actually runs fine. Except I'm really only getting about 12-15 in arcs.

CompletedCoil

I'm using some, old Philips mylar caps in a MCC, and it's certainly not LTR or 3x the NST voltage. But even with 1 minute duty cycles I've never blown a cap. I'm lucky it didn't kill my NST. I just want to refurbish it and make a better capacitor bank, add a saftey gap, maybe some RF chokes too, and probably remake the Primary with more turns so I can add a torus. Even though technically there is nothing wrong with it, I want to make it more efficient and more powerful, and address all the things I overlooked when I made it.

Thanks for your help. I'll save up for the Cornells.

-Tony
Back to top
803
Fri Aug 06 2010, 05:55PM
803 Registered Member #2807 Joined: Fri Apr 16 2010, 08:10PM
Location:
Posts: 191
WHAT! You got it to work it with TV mylar caps! I thought they would break down in minutes!
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Fri Aug 06 2010, 07:58PM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Mr. 803 -

Do you think the survival of Xplorer's existing MMC might be attributable to the fact that it uses a total of 16 capacitors in two parallel strings, rather than just two capacitors in series which I indicated might have a very short lifespan?

If the Phillips caps Xplorer used are of film-foil (FKC) construction, they may be capable of withstanding the high peak currents seen in coil driven by a 12/60 NST. The weakness would be overheating of the high-loss polyester dielectric, which can be minimized bby short run cycles interspersed with cool-down periods.

Xplorer -

You can very easily make a large improvement in your coil's performance by adding a toroidal topload, and a fan help cool and deionize your spark gap. The tiny sphere you are currently using is essentially no topload at all. A 4" X 15" or 5" X 18" convoluted aluminum HVAC duct toroid would cost less than $15, and would greatly enhance your coil's output. Of course, you'd have to retune your primary circuit to resonate at the new lower frequency. Otherwise, your construction is quite clean.

Herr Zapp
Back to top
Xplorer
Fri Aug 06 2010, 11:34PM
Xplorer Registered Member #2416 Joined: Sun Oct 04 2009, 04:23AM
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 91
Herr Zapp wrote ...

Mr. 803 -

Do you think the survival of Xplorer's existing MMC might be attributable to the fact that it uses a total of 16 capacitors in two parallel strings, rather than just two capacitors in series which I indicated might have a very short lifespan?

If the Phillips caps Xplorer used are of film-foil (FKC) construction, they may be capable of withstanding the high peak currents seen in coil driven by a 12/60 NST. The weakness would be overheating of the high-loss polyester dielectric, which can be minimized bby short run cycles interspersed with cool-down periods.

Xplorer -

You can very easily make a large improvement in your coil's performance by adding a toroidal topload, and a fan help cool and deionize your spark gap. The tiny sphere you are currently using is essentially no topload at all. A 4" X 15" or 5" X 18" convoluted aluminum HVAC duct toroid would cost less than $15, and would greatly enhance your coil's output. Of course, you'd have to retune your primary circuit to resonate at the new lower frequency. Otherwise, your construction is quite clean.

Herr Zapp

I totally agree! Like I said, I want to use a top load but I need a few more turns of primary to lower the frequency to match the lower frequency the topload would create in the secondary, and as it is I'm tapped out at max of 10 turns.

But instead I think I will remake my secondary with 22 guage wire, it will be cheaper for me that way.

-Tony
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Sat Aug 07 2010, 12:00AM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Xplorer -

To lower your primary frequency to compensate for a larger topload, why not just add some more capacitance to the primary circuit? It may not be "pretty", but you can easily add another string or two of caps in parallel with your existing MMC.

Or, with a bit more effort, you can add a few more turns to your primary; because of the ever-larger radius, induictance will build quickly. It's easy to splice more copper tubing to your existing primary.

If you decide to build a new secondary, why use relatively huge diameter wire like #22 AWG? Much more appropriate for a 4-6" diameter secondary is #28 AWG.

Herr Zapp
Back to top
Arcstarter
Sat Aug 07 2010, 03:37AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Well my 4 inch secondary wound with 24 gauge double build works great. I got 4.5 foot sparks with 600 watts.
Back to top
Xplorer
Sat Aug 07 2010, 04:11AM
Xplorer Registered Member #2416 Joined: Sun Oct 04 2009, 04:23AM
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 91
Unfortunately I don't have enough of those capacitors, I just have a few in case I need to replace one. Furthermore it's not LTR so now I'd really like to replace it altogether, but as you know *sigh* funds are low.

So it's either make a new capacitor bank (and I kinda don't want to do the salt water design) or remake one of the coils.



Well the reason I'm thinking of remaking the secondary is because I already have the magnet wire and PVC. It essentially costs me nothing except an afternoon of winding.

I used .25in copper rod for my primary but I think if I remake it I'll use 3/8in copper pipe. Home Depot carries 40ft rolls for like 15 bucks.

I know you guys are chanting "Cornells all the way" but there has got to be some other options available. I don't have a problem limiting it to short duty cycles. These are the same specs as the Cornells, except they're 3000v @ .15uf. 8 of them in series will give me .0187uf @ 24kv. Java TC says that the voltage reliability would be questionable, and the temp rise would be good.

Link2

I'm sorry if I'm coming across as guy who ask questions and then ignores the replies because he doesn't like what he hears. I really do appreciate all your opinions.

-Tony
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Sat Aug 07 2010, 04:53AM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Xplorer -

First, if you want to add more capacitance to your tank circuit, you don't have to use more of the same capacitors that you already have. Capacitance is capacitance: any capacitors that will meet the voltage and current requirements of the tank circuit will be fine. Mix and match as you want. Esthetically it might not be elegant, but electrically it will be fine.

Second, your "eBay specials" are NOT the equivalent of the Cornell-Dubilier 942C series. The specs provided do not even state if these are film-foil construction (like the C-Ds). I'll bet money that they are the the cheaper, lower-performance metallized-film construction. They do not specify the peak current, which along with peak voltage, are the most important parameters for surviving in a TC tank circuit.

Without sounding harsh, do you even know what the peak current rating is for the .15uF, 2kV 942C series C-D cap? (It's 432 amps!) If you can find a capacitor with polypropylene dielelectric that has RMS and peak current ratings equal to or greater than the C-D caps, for less cost, than by all means buy them.

With a single 12/60 NST (or even with two of them in parallel), your 1/4" dia copper tube primary is more than adequate. A LARGE coil powered by a 10KVA or larger distribution transformer ("pole pig") might benefit from a 3/8" dia copper tube primary, but not your coil.

I'd just put a decent topload on your coil, buy enough C-D 942C caps to add in parallel to your existing MMC to lower the frequency enough to match your secondary circuit, and make sparks. Later, when you've got more pennies, you can buy more C-D's to make an "all C-D" MMC.

Herr Zapp
Back to top
Xplorer
Sat Aug 07 2010, 06:40AM
Xplorer Registered Member #2416 Joined: Sun Oct 04 2009, 04:23AM
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 91
Herr Zapp wrote ...

Xplorer -

First, if you want to add more capacitance to your tank circuit, you don't have to use more of the same capacitors that you already have. Capacitance is capacitance: any capacitors that will meet the voltage and current requirements of the tank circuit will be fine. Mix and match as you want. Esthetically it might not be elegant, but electrically it will be fine.

Second, your "eBay specials" are NOT the equivalent of the Cornell-Dubilier 942C series. The specs provided do not even state if these are film-foil construction (like the C-Ds). I'll bet money that they are the the cheaper, lower-performance metallized-film construction. They do not specify the peak current, which along with peak voltage, are the most important parameters for surviving in a TC tank circuit.

Without sounding harsh, do you even know what the peak current rating is for the .15uF, 2kV 942C series C-D cap? (It's 432 amps!) If you can find a capacitor with polypropylene dielelectric that has RMS and peak current ratings equal to or greater than the C-D caps, for less cost, than by all means buy them.

With a single 12/60 NST (or even with two of them in parallel), your 1/4" dia copper tube primary is more than adequate. A LARGE coil powered by a 10KVA or larger distribution transformer ("pole pig") might benefit from a 3/8" dia copper tube primary, but not your coil.

I'd just put a decent topload on your coil, buy enough C-D 942C caps to add in parallel to your existing MMC to lower the frequency enough to match your secondary circuit, and make sparks. Later, when you've got more pennies, you can buy more C-D's to make an "all C-D" MMC.

Herr Zapp

Fair enough. Thank you, that's what I'll do then. :)

-Tony
Back to top
803
Sun Aug 08 2010, 03:01PM
803 Registered Member #2807 Joined: Fri Apr 16 2010, 08:10PM
Location:
Posts: 191
Herr Zapp wrote ...

Mr. 803 -

Do you think the survival of Xplorer's existing MMC might be attributable to the fact that it uses a total of 16 capacitors in two parallel strings, rather than just two capacitors in series which I indicated might have a very short lifespan?

If the Phillips caps Xplorer used are of film-foil (FKC) construction, they may be capable of withstanding the high peak currents seen in coil driven by a 12/60 NST. The weakness would be overheating of the high-loss polyester dielectric, which can be minimized bby short run cycles interspersed with cool-down periods.


Herr Zapp

Thanks, Herr wink
Back to top
 1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.