Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 32
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Adam Munich (31)
Alfredo Texacca (61)


Next birthdays
05/04 Matthew T. (36)
05/04 Amrit Deshmukh (61)
05/05 Alexandre (33)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

UK Download Speeds Swindle

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
Proud Mary
Tue Jul 27 2010, 08:30AM Print
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
UK 'misled' on broadband speeds, says Ofcom report

Britons are not getting the broadband services they are being sold, research by the regulator Ofcom suggests


1280219227 543 FT0 Download Speeds Uk May 2010


Link2
Back to top
Nicko
Tue Jul 27 2010, 08:51AM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
I'm on Plus.net 8mbit/s and I never get more than 6.7mbit/s according to speedtest.net. I actually think that is pretty good, considering I'm out in the countryside. Upload speeds are obviously chronic at about 350kbit/s

What they should make clear is the distinction between bitrate (the clock frequency) and actual throughput. They always advertise the bitrate and claim that contention ratios are "a commercial secret".

What amazes me is that this is only coming to a head now - its been known and grumbled about ever since ADSL first appeared...

Pah!
Back to top
IntraWinding
Tue Jul 27 2010, 09:29AM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
I'm on Virgin cable. It's usually just shy of the advertised 10MB, so no complaints there, but I think they still lie about offering unlimited downloads. After you exceed their limit during peak times they cut your speed right back as a penalty for something like 5 hours. If you download 720p or higher resolution films you'll keep running into their limit. A friend has Sky, so he went for their genuinely unlimited 20MB connection.
Back to top
GhostNull
Tue Jul 27 2010, 11:02AM
GhostNull Registered Member #2648 Joined: Sun Jan 24 2010, 12:45PM
Location: Australia
Posts: 291
In Aus (with our S*** internet) I get usually 15% of the up to speed. Right now I'm on up tp 1mbps (the very fastest cable I can get) and I get 156kBps. Before I was on a 516kbps for a different company (same provider I think) and the speed was 56kbps. And before that I had dial up, up to 57kbps and I got 3kbps.

Now you know why Aussie pings are always so low... edit: I mean high! high pings are worse, we have high pings not low pings. gah xD
Back to top
UltraMagnus
Tue Jul 27 2010, 04:42PM
UltraMagnus Registered Member #2875 Joined: Mon May 24 2010, 08:28AM
Location: England
Posts: 42
I am on Be up to 24mbps, I actually get a speed slightly faster than their estimator said I would.

Speed issues are mainly down to the abysmal quality of the infrastructure in this country anyway, it is hardly the ISP's fault that BT can't keep it's own cables in good condition.
Back to top
Coronafix
Wed Jul 28 2010, 12:28AM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
GhostNull wrote ...

In Aus (with our S*** internet) I get usually 15% of the up to speed. Right now I'm on up tp 1mbps (the very fastest cable I can get) and I get 156kBps. Before I was on a 516kbps for a different company (same provider I think) and the speed was 56kbps. And before that I had dial up, up to 57kbps and I got 3kbps.

Now you know why Aussie pings are always so low...

Wow!! That's really s***!! I'm on 1.5Mb and I get just over 1Mb.
Back to top
lpfthings
Wed Jul 28 2010, 06:44AM
lpfthings Registered Member #1361 Joined: Thu Feb 28 2008, 10:57AM
Location: Cairns, Australia
Posts: 305
I have ADSL1 Fast (8mbit/1mbit) and I'm fairly happy with it. I max out at about 700KB/s down and 90KB/s up. Their minimum guarantee is 1500/256kb/s. However, I have a 100GB cap, and it costs me $130/month :(
Back to top
Nicko
Wed Jul 28 2010, 05:20PM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
lpfthings wrote ...

I have ADSL1 Fast (8mbit/1mbit) and I'm fairly happy with it. I max out at about 700KB/s down and 90KB/s up. Their minimum guarantee is 1500/256kb/s. However, I have a 100GB cap, and it costs me $130/month :(
Eeek! I have a 60GB cap and it costs me USD 20 pcm...
Back to top
Conundrum
Wed Jul 28 2010, 05:38PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
grr..
is it no wonder that people "leech" fast wifi connections when available..

what we need is a reliable way to reduce some of the junk on our networks, perhaps introduce a law requiring PC owners to install and use an approved antivirus product or get a bandwidth/speed cap..
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Jul 28 2010, 07:16PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Conundrum wrote ...

what we need is a reliable way to reduce some of the junk on our networks, perhaps introduce a law requiring PC owners to install and use an approved antivirus product or get a bandwidth/speed cap..

Pages load all that much faster when you use NoScript. smile

But the beef isn't the slow speed itself, but that the service providers are perpetrating what amounts to a Trade Descriptions Act offence, by misleading customers to expect a very much higher speed than is in fact available to all but 2% of subscribers.

Fifty to one against getting the advertised speed... smile
Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.