Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 44
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
09/04 Richard (60)
09/06 kjjohn (30)
09/07 Pylon (33)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Grooved Bobbins For Segmented Windings

Move Thread LAN_403
James
Thu Mar 31 2011, 10:51PM
James Registered Member #3610 Joined: Thu Jan 13 2011, 03:29AM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 506
Daedronus wrote ...

Would white delrin be a good choice for a bobbin?
For something like a flyback transformer...


Delrin/Acetal is nice stuff. It's not cheap, but it machines beautifully and I've used scraps of it for a number of different things. As far as I know it's quite chemically resistant too.
Back to top
jpsmith123
Tue Apr 05 2011, 02:42AM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Well here's the coil assembly with the feed through insulators attached to one flange of the bobbin. I guess it's ready to have the wires attached, the outer cylinder put in place, and then be potted.


1301970302 1321 FT92859 Coil With Feed Thru Insulators


The only thing is, I don't like it very much. Sometimes it's hard to imagine just what something will look like until it's built and sitting right in front of you.

It will probably hold up...but I just don't like the idea of running the lead from one side of the coil to about 0.125" away from the other side of the coil.

If I could only think of how to make some "saddle washers" that would seat against the outside cylinder (i.e., that would match the outer radius), I would bring the terminals out radially, which would reduce the field to a more conservative value.
Back to top
Patrick
Tue Apr 05 2011, 05:36AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
jpsmith123 wrote ...


1301970302 1321 FT92859 Coil With Feed Thru Insulators


The only thing is, I don't like it very much. Sometimes it's hard to imagine just what something will look like until it's built and sitting right in front of you.

It will probably hold up...but I just don't like the idea of running the lead from one side of the coil to about 0.125" away from the other side of the coil.
Excellent!!! I see you will be using the sparkplug type boots and sockets.

125 x 300V/mil = 37.5kV of standoff, so your probably fine.
Back to top
Newton Brawn
Tue Apr 05 2011, 01:52PM
Newton Brawn Registered Member #3343 Joined: Thu Oct 21 2010, 04:06PM
Location: Toronto
Posts: 311
Here the other method to wind a 15kV choke;



Back to top
Patrick
Wed Apr 06 2011, 12:44AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Newton Brawn wrote ...

Here the other method to wind a 15kV choke;



1302011539 3343 FT92859 Honey Comb
I dont see much detail. how was this made? What is its significance?
Back to top
jpsmith123
Sat May 07 2011, 05:12PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Well Patrick I just did a quick low power test of the coil, and it seems quite good. Everything looked flat from 20 to about 40 kHz.

The coil I tested was not the multisegmented one, but the layered one I just wound, which has 560 turns of 26 gauge wire.

I'm going to do some more tests later, but so far I'm happy with it. (The only problem is the fact that it's short about 40 turns because I foolishly didn't measure the wire diameter before winding it).

Apparently making the coil "tall and skinny", along with extra layer insulation, really helps.

With 26 gauge wire, it should be capable of 4 to 5 kw throughput I would imagine. Moreover, there's still quite a bit of room inside the coil housing. It seems to me that I could also reduce the width from 0.75" to 0.5", switch from 26 to 28 gauge wire, and put two coils in series, which would produce much more voltage.



1304787982 1321 FT92859 Coil Test
Back to top
Patrick
Sat May 07 2011, 05:47PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
It looks excellent. A point of advice though...I assume everyone knows about skin effect... but many fail to realise the significance of the proximity effect (With 26 Awg I think youll be fine below 80kHz).

How did you arrive at the 4-5kW number?
--How many turns would your primary normally have?
--What is the core number and maker?

Maybe I could verify some of your math?
Back to top
jpsmith123
Sat May 07 2011, 11:36PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
The core is a ferroxcube U100/57/25-3C90. (BTW I was satisfied with it until I saw TSC's new "50all" material, which looks much better than 3C90).

My estimate of as-built power throughput capability is based on the wire size (26 gauge, assuming 0.5 A max current), the number of turns (about 560) and a drive level of approximately 23 to 25 volts(peak)/turn.

Anyway, I compared the segmented coil pictured above with the layer-wound coil, and although the layer wound coil seems good, and is quite useable, IMO, the segmented coil appears to have a better frequency response.

Basically what I did is load the secondary coil with a 68k resistor (to present about 50 ohms to the generator), set the generator for a 1 volt output, and then sweep the primary, while looking at the primary and secondary voltages.

The layer-wound coil started to noticeably load down the (50 ohm) generator at about 45 kHz, whereas the segmented coil didn't do it until about 80 kHz, IIRC.

The segmented coil is wound with 30 gauge wire, so it would not be able to handle as much power. I might be able to make a similar segmented coil with 600 turns of 28 gauge, but as a practical matter that would be pushing that particular design right to the limit, IMO.
Back to top
Patrick
Sat May 07 2011, 11:50PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
jpsmith123 wrote ...

The core is a ferroxcube U100/57/25-3C90. (BTW I was satisfied with it until I saw TSC's new "50all" material, which looks much better than 3C90).
Yes, your welcome.


jpsmith123 wrote ...

My estimate of as-built power throughput capability is based on the wire size (26 gauge, assuming 0.5 A max current), the number of turns (about 560) and a drive level of approximately 23 to 25 volts(peak)/turn.
Its not the wire guage that limits the curretn you can push through, the Guass, determines V/T, which is overall Vout, the H (in Oersteads or whatever) determines your current passability.

EDIT: assuming 450 Amps/cm^2, then:

26 Awg = 0.0159 nom dia. 0.00795^2 x 3.14 = 0.00198 in^2
0.000198 in^2 = 0.001278 cm^2
450 Amps x 0.001278 = 0.575 Amps for 26 awg.

so...
0.575 Amps for 26 awg.
X.XXX Amps for 28 awg.
X.XXX Amps for 30awg.
Back to top
jpsmith123
Sun May 08 2011, 01:25AM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
wrote ...

Its not the wire guage that limits the curretn you can push through, the Guass, determines V/T, which is overall Vout, the H (in Oersteads or whatever) determines your current passability.

Huh? You've lost me there...

wrote ...

assuming 450 Amps/cm^2, then:

26 Awg = 0.0159 nom dia. 0.00795^2 x 3.14 = 0.00198 in^2
0.000198 in^2 = 0.001278 cm^2
450 Amps x 0.001278 = 0.575 Amps for 26 awg.

so...
0.575 Amps for 26 awg.
X.XXX Amps for 28 awg.
X.XXX Amps for 30awg.

The wire table I generally use recommends a maximum current based on 500 circular mils/amp, but I suppose you can always squeeze a little more.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.