Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 59
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
David (38)


Next birthdays
12/25 Kolas (17)
12/25 Dillon4DynamicHarmonics (40)
12/26 buxtronix (49)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

IC die imaging

Move Thread LAN_403
IntraWinding
Wed Jul 07 2010, 09:19AM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
Unusual looking chip. They usually have the connection pads around the edge.

Differential Interference Contrast illumination seems to be the best if this site is anything to go by - you can select 3 different views by clicking text in the second paragraph below the image Link2

Back to top
rp181
Wed Jul 07 2010, 11:31AM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
DIC is commonly used for biological, but its great for SiC too. (its from a growth and characterization lab). If anyone wants to send me chips (w/ die exposed), I can image them.

I think the circle radius in the highest magnification(I didn't post one) is 83um.


Back to top
Herr Zapp
Wed Jul 07 2010, 02:39PM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Intrawinding wrote:

"Differential Interference Contrast illumination seems to be the best if this site is anything to go by - you can select 3 different views by clicking text in the second paragraph below the image Link2

I'm not sure I agree. Unfortunately, all three images are not shown at the same magnification, so it's hard to compare the rendering of small details in the DIC image. Nevertheless, if you look closely at the details of the ties in the tracks, the sharpness of the edges of the ties appears to be much better in the dark-field image.

Regards,
Herr Zapp
Back to top
rp181
Wed Jul 07 2010, 03:41PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
I think it is a close tie between the two, wish I had a dark field microscope to compare.
Here are two more I took today (They are rotated 180 degrees). The radius is 415um (I think).
The only difference is that one has the polarizing filters removed, so it is like a normal top illuminated microscope. I also adjusted the brightness to compensate for the light the filters block.

Thiss is from a 2" quarter wafer, and a particulary bad one (usually less steps, notice how bad the numbers are).
Back to top
IntraWinding
Wed Jul 07 2010, 04:18PM
IntraWinding Registered Member #2261 Joined: Mon Aug 03 2009, 01:19AM
Location: London, UK
Posts: 581
Herr Zapp wrote ...

Intrawinding wrote:

"Differential Interference Contrast illumination seems to be the best if this site is anything to go by - you can select 3 different views by clicking text in the second paragraph below the image Link2

I'm not sure I agree. Unfortunately, all three images are not shown at the same magnification, so it's hard to compare the rendering of small details in the DIC image. Nevertheless, if you look closely at the details of the ties in the tracks, the sharpness of the edges of the ties appears to be much better in the dark-field image.

Regards,
Herr Zapp

I'm assuming these different techniques just affect the difference in colour/contrast between regions on a chip and not resolution.


rp181 wrote ...

I think it is a close tie between the two, wish I had a dark field microscope to compare.
Here are two more I took today (They are rotated 180 degrees). The radius is 415um (I think).
Link2
Link2
The only difference is that one has the polarizing filters removed, so it is like a normal top illuminated microscope. I also adjusted the brightness to compensate for the light the filters block.

This is from a 2" quarter wafer, and a particulary bad one (usually less steps, notice how bad the numbers are).

The second shows crystal patterns. Are these the 'steps' you mention? They're invisible in the first image.



Back to top
rp181
Wed Jul 07 2010, 05:10PM
rp181 Registered Member #1062 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2007, 02:01AM
Location:
Posts: 1529
Yes. When there is a single step, it is a step. When there are multiple in succesion (i.e. bottom left hex) it is a screwed distortion, or a bad mask during deposition.

The color and contrast can be changed with the same controls. Its odd how in the train there is a wide bearth of colors, the thickness difference must be large. I use the orange, I find I can see the imperfections best in that color. You can get a blue, gray, or green, and any transition in between.

The first is with unfiltered light besides minor conditioning, shutters, etc...
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.