If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2288
Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
I have the opportunity to purchase a Philips Optimus 65 X-Ray Transformer at a good price and am wondering about saturation problems. It is stated to operate at 7000hz, 150kV at up to 65kW. I'll be using it at fractions of 1kW, so basically no load as far as the core is concerned. I've had x-ray transformers in the past that have saturated and are useless without full load. Does anyone have experience with this transformer to know if it will work without full load?
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
I have no experience whatsoever with x-ray transformers, but a fair bit with other types, basic principles; Current capbility is determined by heating of the wires so is (mostly) independant of voltage, so whatever the voltage, your transformer can supply 65kW/150k = 433 mA.
For a given core cross-section and number of turns, V.F is constant for a constant magnetic flux, so at 60Hz you can get 150kV x 60/7000 = 1.3 kV
Registered Member #2288
Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Yes I am... I asked him to test it but always nice to get a second opinion. All he has is an audio amp driving them so I'm not sure how comprehensive of a test he can do. I live where it would have to be shipped so I'd rather not just hope it'd work.
And yes, I want to run at 1kW not 65 (actually probably far less than even 1kW)
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
dude_500 wrote ... ...I've had x-ray transformers in the past that have saturated and are useless without full load.
Not sure what you mean by "saturated". The permissible maximum flux density in the core can be translated to a limit on "volt-seconds per cycle" or "volts per hertz". I don't see how reducing the secondary current can increase the magnetic flux density, IF the high-frequency driver maintains a fixed voltage and frequency. Unless there is a large I*R voltage drop in the primary winding under full-load conditions, enough to keep the volt-seconds below saturation.
There might be an issue with x-ray systems using self-rectification by the x-ray tube. That results in significant DC current in the secondary loop, when tube is conducting. So the primary winding is generally in series with a (diode in parallel with a resistor) to allow appropriate DC current to flow in primary & avoid saturation.
Registered Member #2288
Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Klugesmith wrote ...
dude_500 wrote ... ...I've had x-ray transformers in the past that have saturated and are useless without full load.
Not sure what you mean by "saturated". The permissible maximum flux density in the core can be translated to a limit on "volt-seconds per cycle" or "volts per hertz". I don't see how reducing the secondary current can increase the magnetic flux density, IF the high-frequency driver maintains a fixed voltage and frequency. Unless there is a large I*R voltage drop in the primary winding under full-load conditions, enough to keep the volt-seconds below saturation.
There might be an issue with x-ray systems using self-rectification by the x-ray tube. That results in significant DC current in the secondary loop, when tube is conducting. So the primary winding is generally in series with a (diode in parallel with a resistor) to allow appropriate DC current to flow in primary & avoid saturation.
The last x-ray core I had which was 60hz was useless because if it was driven up to 110V primary, it would draw >2000W from the wall with zero secondary. This is what I mean by saturation. It couldn't be used effectively below it's dozens of KW rating.
Registered Member #56
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
This is not saturation, for reasons that are probably not worth getting into. The current you are seeing is called the 'magnetizing' current, and is mostly reactive (or you could say has a power factor of about .01, or is drawing very little 'real' power, most of that 2KVA is being reflected back to the power company). Note the distinction between VA and W, a watt implies 'real' power, where as VA is just rms current multiplied by rms voltage--depending on the phase of the voltage and current these numbers are only the same for a power factor of 1.
That being said, it is a solvable problem, and the solution in the case of the large 60Hz transformer was probably as simple as adding a capacitor bank in parallel with the primary to help balance out all of the reactive power.
In the case of the 7000Hz transformer, you just need to design your driver correctly, there is no reason a large transformer can't be used at well under its rating (but you have to deal with the added cost/size of an oversized transformer, so it is rarely done)
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
dude_500 wrote ...
The last x-ray core I had which was 60hz was useless because if it was driven up to 110V primary, it would draw >2000W from the wall with zero secondary. This is what I mean by saturation. It couldn't be used effectively below it's dozens of KW rating.
The Philips Optimus 65 requires a 3-phase ~400V supply Ipk 190A, but Islowblow <50A. An up-convertor to enable operation from 230V single phase is available as a costly optional extra.
The Optimus 65 has 111 user selectable 1kV steps ranging from 40kV/100uA, through to user selected permutations of 65kW i.e. 900mA @ 65kV and 433mA @ 150kV.
Registered Member #2288
Joined: Wed Aug 12 2009, 10:42PM
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 179
Proud Mary wrote ...
dude_500 wrote ...
The last x-ray core I had which was 60hz was useless because if it was driven up to 110V primary, it would draw >2000W from the wall with zero secondary. This is what I mean by saturation. It couldn't be used effectively below it's dozens of KW rating.
The Philips Optimus 65 requires a 3-phase ~400V supply Ipk 190A, but Islowblow <50A. An up-convertor to enable operation from 230V single phase is available as a costly optional extra.
The Optimus 65 has 111 user selectable 1kV steps ranging from 40kV/100uA, through to user selected permutations of 65kW i.e. 900mA @ 65kV and 433mA @ 150kV.
I won't be using the big 3-phase 400V driver though, I already have a small MOSFET driver based on the IRS2453 chip that can drive up to about a kilowatt max. The sale is only for the transformer, not all the driver circuitry.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.