Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Sync (33)
Grant-ZA (58)
FreakyG (56)
brtaman (38)


Next birthdays
04/22 Sync (33)
04/22 Grant-ZA (58)
04/22 FreakyG (56)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

"Electric flame" HF VTTC

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
Arcstarter
Tue Sept 08 2009, 09:15PM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
I would say beyond a reasonable doubt tubes are easier to make a circuit for. You don't even need any kind of actives, and only 3 passives (excluding the filament bypass cap) which is resonator, RF inductor on the input, and the feedback, which all are very few turns. Getting it to work took no time at all. Though, i started with 5 feedback turns, and ended up with one. Also, if your mosfets get hot you can 'sink 'em. When using tubes you do not have that luxury, the plate is all that is there to dissipate the heat. Unless you have the radiator on the plate, which *sticks thumb up*.

I did use more passives, though. I used a RF filter on the plate, and i have used a pair of 2.7nf 2kvdc capacitors from the plate of the tube to sort of help protect from having a MOT shorted through you, but as long as the oscillations continue, this offers no real protection. I had the cap sitting right in front of me, and some schematics use it, so i thought why not.

Running mosfets at 10Mhz? Really? Wow. You make it sound like it is no big deal. I always just figured mosfets, such as the IRFP series, would not run 10Mhz without a destroyed gate or something like that.

Also, if you are familiar with the IRFP350 (no suffix), would you happen to know if it would run around 4-6Mhz?

How would you drive the gate of MOSFETs at this kind of frequency? Forget about galvanic isolation right now. Tiny totem pole pair of BJTs driving a bigger totem pole or a mosfet half-bridge or something?
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Tue Sept 08 2009, 09:45PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
> Running mosfets at 10Mhz? Really? Wow. You make it sound like it is no big deal.

Many modern switchmode power MOSFETs can switch efficiently up to around 15MHz or so using single-ended topologies like the Class-E amplifier. Small-signal MOSFETs running well into the GHz region are also common in RF applications and modern microprocessor technology.

> I always just figured mosfets, such as the IRFP series, would not run 10Mhz without a destroyed gate or something like that.

Small die devices like IRF510 can run efficiently up to around 40MHz, but Fmax for efficient operating decreases with increasing die size. As you suggested, driving the gate effectively is the first challenge. The second is minimising switching losses by using drain-current shaping or drain-voltage shaping to minimise V/I overlap at the switching instants.

> Also, if you are familiar with the IRFP350 (no suffix), would you happen to know if it would run around 4-6Mhz?

Should be good for about 400W of power at those frequencies in Class-E. Take a look at the Class-E papers by Sokal, and the work by Rutledge and Caltech.

> How would you drive the gate of MOSFETs at this kind of frequency?

At frequencies in the range 1 - 8MHz I would use a Mn/Zn ferrite transformer to provide impedance matching into the gate, and cancellation of the MOSFET gate's capacitive reactance. At the high end of that frequency range, the leakage inductance of the GDT can cancel the capacitive reactance of the gate. At the low end additional variable inductance may be required. At the high end Mn/Zn starts to get quite lossy.

From 6MHz to about 16MHz I would us Ni/Zn ferrite instead for the GDT, possibly with additional capacitance in series if the leakage inductance of the transformer is too high.

Above 15MHz I would use a reverse L-match network to match directly to the gate of the MOSFET without galvanic isolation.

Regardless of the arrangement chosen the gate-drive circuit basically encompasses the MOSFET gate in a resonant circuit that allows it to be efficiently driven with a nice big beefy sinewave at the intended switching frequency.

Some info about my 4MHz Class-E HFSSTC is here:

Link2

and a similar device running at 8MHz is shown here:

Link2

-Richie,
Back to top
Arcstarter
Wed Sept 09 2009, 12:46AM
Arcstarter Registered Member #1225 Joined: Sat Jan 12 2008, 01:24AM
Location: Beaumont, Texas, USA
Posts: 2253
Thanks alot, Richie! Very informative.

I am now confident that a HF sstc is within reach. Hope to only go through a few mosfets :P sarcasm(oh yea, that is rather wishful thinking, ain't it?)/sarcasm

I have read up on your 4Mhz sstc, which is where i originally got the idea. I plan to use a crystal, because of its stability, and simplicity. The more difficult it is, the harder it is to fix. Also, a CD4046 will only do 2.7Mhz, which would still be interesting, but 4Mhz is what i decided on. I need to read up on your page again, though.

Time will tell...
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Wed Sept 09 2009, 12:20PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
I'd definitely recommend using a ready-made crystal oscillator module. Then you know that the frequency is fixed and the timing is rock-solid and stable. You design everything to work at this spot frequency, and tune the TC resonator to match.

4MHz isn't too difficult. The 8MHz HFSSTC was quite finicky for tuning, and the 18MHz one kind of worked once I think! wink
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.