If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #96
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Hi all.
I was concerned recently to read about a British man, Gary McKinnon who is facing serious charges for "hacking" into the US DoD and NASA, and facing life imprisonment if convicted.
The main issue here is, should someone who clearly has a developmental disorder that affects his judgement, be effectively sentenced to death to all intents and purposes when the very same offence in the UK carries a maximum sentence of two years per count.
I feel that this particular case is an outrageous misuse of powers originally intended to combat terrorism, when clearly this is a less serious issue. In fact, it proves that anyone stupid enough to use default usernames and passwords on a military system should be held accountable.
Please keep discussions on topic, and try not to start a flame war.
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3141
I have several thoughts on this topic, the main ones are
- Why do we (UK) allow extradition laws to be one-sided? If a US citizen hacked a UK site there is no reciprocal legal arrangement afaik.
- When the internet was young I used to 'hack' my way into all sorts of places (no details = no prosecution!) never with malicious intent and afaik never causing any harm. It's like mountain climbing...why climb a mountain?...because it's there. NOW with paranoia and me being a Muslim I daren't do such things, I'm concerned that even visiting certain websites is an indication of guilt!
- I can't really accept (in this case) the mental disorder excuse we're all a little mad in some way or other and if this chap had the intelligence to 'hack' with a purpose (even a dumb one) on multiple occasions he is surely capable of understanding his own actions.
- on the assumption that no deliberate harm to the systems was done then I consider it like Trespass, a very minor misdemeanor. - if deliberate damage was caused then I consider it like Vandalism, a bigger misdemeanor - I doubt that anyone was physically, mentally or financially harmed.
- The main problem is that Governments (definitely the UK government) are careless with data. ( Think of Banks, Airlines, Utility companies etc.) Rather than protect sensitive data properly they want 'scapegoats' as deterrents. This is not justice, it's terrorism.
Registered Member #2123
Joined: Sat May 16 2009, 03:10AM
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 312
There should be equilateral treaties for extradition. If it is true (I don't know) that the U.K. has an one-sided extradition treaty with the U.S. concerning unlawful access to system computers, it should be re-negotiated. The onus is with the U.K. government.
However, how would you feel if this individual had hacked into your personal data/bank account and misappropriated your money, I.D., etc.? Would you think it was your fault for not using better passwords?
I don't know the details of the case, what damage if any, Mr. McKinnon inflicted. If those details are not revealed, I would tend to believe Mr. McKinnon got into classified material files and has embarrassed some folks over here. If Mr McKinnon downloaded any of that material, then it is just too bad for him. He crossed a line, and rightly or wrongly a Big Government is going to want to make an example of him. I wouldn't characterize it as a death sentence though. The prosecutor will probably work out a deal if McKinnon cooperates, he could end up being a security consultant, working from behind bars though.
Registered Member #193
Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
Surely the simple question has nothing to do with extradition. Why does a man with mental health problems face the a life sentence in the US for actions that harmed nobody?
Should Brittain reconsider the extradition treaty? is anothe valid question.
... not Russel! Registered Member #1
Joined: Thu Jan 26 2006, 12:18AM
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1052
Sparks wrote ...
Apparently the reason the US want him is because not what he has done but rather what he seen
The supposed damage he caused was only raised much later and is highly dubious!
I think Sparks just made the best point of all. Clearly the guy is a crackpot, and is only a danger to himself. IMHO, going after him just gives him attention he doesn't deserve, and the US should drop the extradition request on the condition that he get some serious medical help.
Registered Member #135
Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
1. espionage is a serious crime that really really rubbs governments the wrong way.
2. He admited to exploiting the network security flaw for more then 2 years, which is not just snooping around or weekend warrior hacking.
3. He installed a program on a secure network, big no no, with the intent of taking secured information.
You don't break in and disseminate information. I'm not sure how much of a punishment there should be, but his intent is clear as are his motives, this was espionage and punishable.
Registered Member #160
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Robin Hood of hackers. Obviously not a crackpot, and in fact a guy with considerable intelligence. In no way am I supporting hacking, I have been done in via the very password scenario he describes, but his reasoning is honest. I hope the yanks don't get him, it'll show where justice has really gone.
... not Russel! Registered Member #1
Joined: Thu Jan 26 2006, 12:18AM
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1052
Coronafix wrote ...
Robin Hood of hackers.
In what way? What did he give to anyone that was of any value? Nothing. He claims to have seen some things, wow.
From Wikipedia:
He claims his motivation, drawn from a statement made before the Washington Press Club on 9 May 2001 by the "The Disclosure Project", was to find evidence of UFOs, antigravity technology, and the suppression of "Free Energy", all of which he claims to have proven through his actions.
That's about as crackpot as it gets. It also, IMHO, makes him pretty harmless. What he did may technically have been espionage, but he wasn't selling nuclear secrets to China nor attempting to cause harm. He may as well have hacked the US Forestry Service looking for evidence of Bigfoot. Seems to me that the US government should be thankful it was this guy and not someone who really meant to do harm.
It's not worth the bad press and lending credence to this guy's paranoid delusions. I'm sure the UK would gladly keep an eye on the guy and make sure he's taking the right medications in exchange for the US dropping the matter, so why make a martyr out of him?
Registered Member #135
Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
Chris and a couple of you other guys are missing the bigger picture here. Containment of information is of critical importance to an orginization. If they now have a breach of security, they have to find out who and how big, then they have to exercise measures to contain, debrief, imprison, etc. That's how things are.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.