If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #480
Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Eniyuki -
Your link to the data on the 100W resistors did not work for me, but I think I found the Tyco 100W power resistors in the TME on-line catalog. Are they the parts with the gold anodized housings? These resistors are not rated for high voltage, but may work, depending on how good the internal insulation is. Be careful to mount them so the housings are isolated from anything at ground potential, as the flashover distance from the resistor terminals to the housing probably will not withstand 15KV.
Don't worry about too many air holes reducing the cooling or quenching performance of your spark gap. You definitely do not want airflow restriction on the "inlet" side of the housing. If you have a powerful vacuum motor, especially is it has a two-stage impeller, it can generate a significant negative pressure. If your gap is surrounded by a negative pressure, the gap breakdown voltage will be reduced, which will reduce performance. In some cases you'll get better performance if you turn the vacuum motor around so that it blows air through the gap, rather than sucking air through the gap. Given that your gap assembly is essentially completed, I'd just add 2X or 3X as many holes in all three plates of your gap enclosure, and test the system.
For your MMC, be careful of mounting the capacitors directly to the surface of a plastic sheet, with holes drilled for the leads. I've seen several MMC failures due to surface tracking across the plastic, probably caused by residue from the soldering flux, sweaty fingerprints, dust, etc. I prefer to mount the capacitors slightly elevated above the board surface using "turret standoffs". These may be hard to find, so you could use any type of insulating spacer (ceramic standoff insulators, short segments of plastic tuning, nylon spacers, etc). In any case, leave planty of spacing between leads that have a large potential difference across them, and after assembly carefully clean everything using isopropyl alcohol.
A few questions for you: 1. What is the gap width that your static gap assembly is currently set to, as shown in your photos? 2. Is the gap spacing adjustable? 3. What are the two objects shown on the LH side of the "black spray paint" photos? The NSTs are obvious, but I can't determine what the other items are.
Here are a few photos of small MMcs using the standoff construction method:
Registered Member #2148
Joined: Tue Jun 02 2009, 02:22AM
Location:
Posts: 62
Herr Zapp wrote ...
Eniyuki -
Your link to the data on the 100W resistors did not work for me, but I think I found the Tyco 100W power resistors in the TME on-line catalog. Are they the parts with the gold anodized housings? These resistors are not rated for high voltage, but may work, depending on how good the internal insulation is. Be careful to mount them so the housings are isolated from anything at ground potential, as the flashover distance from the resistor terminals to the housing probably will not withstand 15KV.
Don't worry about too many air holes reducing the cooling or quenching performance of your spark gap. You definitely do not want airflow restriction on the "inlet" side of the housing. If you have a powerful vacuum motor, especially is it has a two-stage impeller, it can generate a significant negative pressure. If your gap is surrounded by a negative pressure, the gap breakdown voltage will be reduced, which will reduce performance. In some cases you'll get better performance if you turn the vacuum motor around so that it blows air through the gap, rather than sucking air through the gap. Given that your gap assembly is essentially completed, I'd just add 2X or 3X as many holes in all three plates of your gap enclosure, and test the system.
For your MMC, be careful of mounting the capacitors directly to the surface of a plastic sheet, with holes drilled for the leads. I've seen several MMC failures due to surface tracking across the plastic, probably caused by residue from the soldering flux, sweaty fingerprints, dust, etc. I prefer to mount the capacitors slightly elevated above the board surface using "turret standoffs". These may be hard to find, so you could use any type of insulating spacer (ceramic standoff insulators, short segments of plastic tuning, nylon spacers, etc). In any case, leave planty of spacing between leads that have a large potential difference across them, and after assembly carefully clean everything using isopropyl alcohol.
A few questions for you: 1. What is the gap width that your static gap assembly is currently set to, as shown in your photos? 2. Is the gap spacing adjustable? 3. What are the two objects shown on the LH side of the "black spray paint" photos? The NSTs are obvious, but I can't determine what the other items are.
Here are a few photos of small MMcs using the standoff construction method:
Regards, Herr Zapp
Herr Zapp Yes it is gold anodized housing.
For my spark gap i collapsed after i read that but i understande your explanation very well. When i get back i will rework it and add more holes.
Suddenly pops out of my mind. What if i add a pipe from the exhaust to the electrodes? Will it work? Just an idea. On the other hand i have a synchronous shaded pole motor. 220 volts 60 hertz 2000 rpm. Can i use that to build rotary spark gap? At first the reason why i didnt build rotary spark gap is because i ordered the capacitors already and have a low budget. Im a college student. The mmc chart says that i need 0.0227uF for rotary spark gap. If i use 0.015uF as my primary tank using rotary spark gap will it work?
For your questions 1. Gap width total is 0.25 inch. Electrodes are 1 inch diameter 4 inch in length. 2. Yes it is adjustable. 3. What do you mean? If your talking about the one with the newspaper, those are top covers of nst. If the one with the home made capacitor thats my primary runner.
For my mmc. Im still waiting for it to arrive. I will take all your advices on designing my mmc. Thank you very much.
Registered Member #480
Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Eniyuki -
I'm not sure what you mean when you say "what if I add a pipe from the exhaust to the electrodes". Do you mean make it into a closed-loop system, with the air constantly recirculating from the exhaust back in to the inlet? This would be a bad idea, the intent is to flush the hot ionized air out of the spark gap and replace it with cool, un-ionized air. I'd just add some more ventilation holes, and run your spark gap "as-is" for your initial testing.
Your answers: 1. OK, .25" should be fine for initial tests. 2. Good, you may decide to make some adjustments later to see how total gap width affects performance. 3. OK, I didn't notice that the top covers were removed from the NST housings.
Have you calculated the primary-secondary coupling coefficient ("K factor") that your primary will provide? That is another variable that can have a large influence on coil performance. From your photos, it looks like the plane of the primary coil may be quite a bit lower than the bottom turn of your secondary, which would yield a low coupling factor. Coupling factors of between .12 and .15 are typical values for spark-gap coils. If you design-in some way that you can raise and lower either the primary or the secondary, it will be easier to find the "sweet spot" during tuning. Adjustment increments of .25 inch are fine. Use MandK, JAVATC, or another Tesla coil design tool to calculate your coil's K.
Registered Member #2148
Joined: Tue Jun 02 2009, 02:22AM
Location:
Posts: 62
Herr Zapp wrote ...
Eniyuki -
I'm not sure what you mean when you say "what if I add a pipe from the exhaust to the electrodes". Do you mean make it into a closed-loop system, with the air constantly recirculating from the exhaust back in to the inlet? This would be a bad idea, the intent is to flush the hot ionized air out of the spark gap and replace it with cool, un-ionized air. I'd just add some more ventilation holes, and run your spark gap "as-is" for your initial testing.
Your answers: 1. OK, .25" should be fine for initial tests. 2. Good, you may decide to make some adjustments later to see how total gap width affects performance. 3. OK, I didn't notice that the top covers were removed from the NST housings.
Have you calculated the primary-secondary coupling coefficient ("K factor") that your primary will provide? That is another variable that can have a large influence on coil performance. From your photos, it looks like the plane of the primary coil may be quite a bit lower than the bottom turn of your secondary, which would yield a low coupling factor. Coupling factors of between .12 and .15 are typical values for spark-gap coils. If you design-in some way that you can raise and lower either the primary or the secondary, it will be easier to find the "sweet spot" during tuning. Adjustment increments of .25 inch are fine. Use MandK, JAVATC, or another Tesla coil design tool to calculate your coil's K.
Regards, Herr Zapp
Yes i think it was a bad idea though. Well, my k is 0.131. In my design, i made another runner which can hold 12 turns of primary winding and much bigger now in terms of height and length compared to the first which it can hold only 9 turns. And another is that my base platform can be adjusted up and down for better coupling. Double deck room for nsts,mmc,filter etc.
Is there a minimum spacing between turns of primary winding? Mine is .15 inch(cannot be adjusted! I already made holes). How bout between primary and secondary? Mine is 1 inch. My primary is 5 degree because of my primary runner. Is it okay if my filter doesnt have mov's? I cant find them locally. Thank you!
Registered Member #1643
Joined: Mon Aug 18 2008, 06:10PM
Location:
Posts: 1039
I like the primary supports, Personally I think the slanted ends look cool. Is it usually hard to fish copper tubing through the wholes? I figured it would be so I tried it a different way...
Registered Member #480
Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Eniyuki -
Your initial coupling factor of .13 should be fine. epecially if you have some means to adjust it.
I have never used MOVs in my Terry filters because I frequently used the filters with various NSTs of different voltages, and I didn't want to "rework" the filter each time. With a properly adjusted 3-ball spark gap at the output side of the filter you should be OK without the MOVs.
On my Terry filters, I actually have TWO 3-ball spark gaps, one at the input side, and one at the output side of the filter. Curiously, during some operating conditions I have seen the spark gaps at the INPUT side of the filter sparking while the gaps at the OUTPUT side were not. (All spark gaps had the same ball diameter, and were carefully set at the same gap distance.)
You may find it harder than you think to get the primary conducter routed through the holes in your primary supports, especially if you secure the supports to the baseplate first. I made a flat spiral primary once using the "feed it through the holes" technique, and I'll NEVER attempt it again. I was using relatively thick primary supports (3/8") and PVC insulated wire, which created more friction in the holes than bare copper tubing will. The first few turns were easy to slip through, but as the wire moved in to the smaller radius holes, the friction became extreme, even with everything "lubricated" with soapy water.
A more common (and MUCH easier to assemble) technique to just slot the primary supports so the conductor can be "snapped in" from above.
Remember NOT to try to straighten out your copper tubing in any way. Annealed copper will work-harden to a shocking degree with even a little straightening or bending, and it will become impossible to make a clean, uniform spiral. That's why the "open slot" primary design is so easy to assemble: just have someone hold the coil of copper tubing slightly above the primary supports, and guide the free end down into the slots.
Also, it looks like the hole locations in your primary supports are identical for all the supports. This would be OK if your primary was a series of concentric circles, but it is in fact a spiral. Each hole in each primary support should be offset slightly to allow for the "pitch" of the spiral (each support's holes offset by primary pitch/number of supports). Each support needs to have a unique identification mark so you can position them in the correct sequence before you start installing the primary conductor.
Registered Member #2148
Joined: Tue Jun 02 2009, 02:22AM
Location:
Posts: 62
Herr Zapp wrote ...
Eniyuki -
Your initial coupling factor of .13 should be fine. epecially if you have some means to adjust it.
I have never used MOVs in my Terry filters because I frequently used the filters with various NSTs of different voltages, and I didn't want to "rework" the filter each time. With a properly adjusted 3-ball spark gap at the output side of the filter you should be OK without the MOVs.
On my Terry filters, I actually have TWO 3-ball spark gaps, one at the input side, and one at the output side of the filter. Curiously, during some operating conditions I have seen the spark gaps at the INPUT side of the filter sparking while the gaps at the OUTPUT side were not. (All spark gaps had the same ball diameter, and were carefully set at the same gap distance.)
You may find it harder than you think to get the primary conducter routed through the holes in your primary supports, especially if you secure the supports to the baseplate first. I made a flat spiral primary once using the "feed it through the holes" technique, and I'll NEVER attempt it again. I was using relatively thick primary supports (3/8") and PVC insulated wire, which created more friction in the holes than bare copper tubing will. The first few turns were easy to slip through, but as the wire moved in to the smaller radius holes, the friction became extreme, even with everything "lubricated" with soapy water.
A more common (and MUCH easier to assemble) technique to just slot the primary supports so the conductor can be "snapped in" from above.
Remember NOT to try to straighten out your copper tubing in any way. Annealed copper will work-harden to a shocking degree with even a little straightening or bending, and it will become impossible to make a clean, uniform spiral. That's why the "open slot" primary design is so easy to assemble: just have someone hold the coil of copper tubing slightly above the primary supports, and guide the free end down into the slots.
Also, it looks like the hole locations in your primary supports are identical for all the supports. This would be OK if your primary was a series of concentric circles, but it is in fact a spiral. Each hole in each primary support should be offset slightly to allow for the "pitch" of the spiral (each support's holes offset by primary pitch/number of supports). Each support needs to have a unique identification mark so you can position them in the correct sequence before you start installing the primary conductor.
Regards, Herr Zapp
Ill keep that in mind. Bout my runner Well,i think that too, im lazy so i didnt calculate the pitch of each runner. Even though i calculated it, it will not become accurate because i dont have proper tools to do it. My real plan is to have a snap in runner but before i do that il try first the putting through hole. Before i secure my runner to the base, i.ll install first the primary to the supports so that i can adjust it .
Btw, u didnt give me advice about my plan on my synchronous motor that i will be used in buiding my my rotary spark gap p Thanks!
Registered Member #480
Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Eniyuki -
As far as trying to use a small "shaded-pole" motor to drive a synchronous RSG, I wouldn't waste the time. Shaded-pole motors have low starting torque, and are designed for very low inertia loads (like fans, etc). Although there have been posts on 4HV showing that people have modified shaded-pole motors so that they do run in synchronous mode, I've never seen a well-designed, carefully-constructed SRSG actually running while powered by a shaded-pole motor.
I'd wait until you can find a larger conventional AC induction motor that could be modified for salient-pole operation and be capable of driving a 10" diameter (or larger) G-10 or phenolic disk.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.