Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 36
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
kilovolt (50)
wannabegeekTC (50)
Elijah (34)


Next birthdays
04/22 Sync (33)
04/22 Grant-ZA (58)
04/22 FreakyG (56)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Getting the ball rolling...

Move Thread LAN_403
StevenCaton
Wed Jun 10 2009, 06:25PM
StevenCaton Registered Member #1845 Joined: Fri Dec 05 2008, 05:38AM
Location: California
Posts: 211
As far as spark length goes, would adjusting the variac up really make a significant difference?

Don't bother turning the variac up past 120VAC right now. If your system is only making 10 inch sparks, when your power supply should allow you to go much closer to 30+ inch sparks, turning up the variac makes no sense right now.
is there a way to calculate the change in output wattage if i change the input voltage?
You mean output wattage of the variac itself? Lets say it pulls 3 amps at 120VAC. So that's 360 Watts. If you crank it up to 135VAC and it now pulls 3.5 amps from the line, its 135 X 3.5, which is 472.5 Watts.

Back to top
Blitzorn
Wed Jun 10 2009, 11:38PM
Blitzorn Registered Member #2128 Joined: Thu May 21 2009, 03:17AM
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 58
no, i mean if i put 472.5 watts (or whatever, anything other than 360 watts) into the NSTs, how will THEIR output change? that was the intended question.
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Thu Jun 11 2009, 02:13AM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Blitzhorn -

Without digressing too far into the topics of Watts vs volt-amps, NST magnetic shunts & core saturation, or the inability to "put" watts into anything, here are some thoughts on increasing the power input into the primary circuit:

1. If you increase the output voltage of the NST, and increase the total width of the (static) spark gap, the primary cap will charge to a higher voltage before the spark gap fires. As the energy stored in a capacitor is proportional to the square of the voltage across the capacitor, increasing the voltage even slightly can significantly increase the energy the capacitor dumps into the primary circuit every time the spark gap fires ("bang size").

2. If you increase the output current of the NST, it can bring the capacitor to full charge in a shorter time period. With a static spark gap, this will usually increase the break rate, which will increase the power (per unit of time) being pumped into the primary circuit. You'd think that a static gap could only fire at some multiple of the AC line frequency, but actually it fires quite chaotically.

Regards,
Herr Zapp
Back to top
Blitzorn
Thu Jun 11 2009, 05:46AM
Blitzorn Registered Member #2128 Joined: Thu May 21 2009, 03:17AM
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 58
Herr Zapp -

Excuse the slip - you're right, it's proper to use VA in this case, but the conceptual object is the same. Also, the distinction between putting "watts" of power into something and establishing an electromotive force that draws a certain current that is measured in watts is a bit nit-picky for this purpose, but the devil is in the details, after all. One detail i don't know much about is this particular model of NST's interior construction, so knowing when output levels out is really a matter of impirical testing.

1. Simple enough. More voltage in, more voltage out, more power, more bang, more fun. If it's any indicator of the capacitor's ability, the glass is quite cold to the touch after use, but even if heating is a sign of overstress i'm cautious enough to not assume that just because they are chilly doesn't mean they aren't lethally loaded and possibly already running at maximum load. This will bear further study.

2. This is where my understanding falters. All i can glean about current is that it varies based on many factors, and in this case, as i understand it, the increase would be due simply to the higher VA input being transformed proportionally. I'm ready to be corrected on that one xD

This still, although helpful, hasn't really answered the question, or if it has i haven't taken care to make sure i know exactly what i'm asking. just to clarify, if i move the variac tap up to 135VAC output, will it increase the voltage and current output of the NSTs?
Back to top
Herr Zapp
Thu Jun 11 2009, 06:01AM
Herr Zapp Registered Member #480 Joined: Thu Jul 06 2006, 07:08PM
Location: North America
Posts: 644
Blitzhorn wrote:

"....if i move the variac tap up to 135VAC output, will it increase the voltage and current output of the NSTs?"

In a nutshell, yes.

This exact topic was recently discussed on the TCML, and Bart Anderson performed some voltage and current measurements on a 15/30 NST with input voltages from 10-150V.

The resulting open-circuit voltage graph can be seen at: Link2

And the resulting short-circuit current graph can be seen at: Link2

Your 7.5/30 NSTs should respond to increased input voltage in a similar manner.

Check out the thread "Toroid Question" on the TCML where there are a number of posts discussing this topic.

Regards,
Herr Zapp

Back to top
Blitzorn
Fri Jun 12 2009, 02:15AM
Blitzorn Registered Member #2128 Joined: Thu May 21 2009, 03:17AM
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 58
Oh cool, thanks much for the clarification :)

I think this thread has performed its purpose at this point, considering the project as stated is now complete and the proverbial ball is undeniably revolving on a horiontal axis perpendicular to its direction of travel.
Back to top
StevenCaton
Fri Jun 12 2009, 04:33AM
StevenCaton Registered Member #1845 Joined: Fri Dec 05 2008, 05:38AM
Location: California
Posts: 211
the proverbial ball is undeniably revolving on a horiontal axis perpendicular to its direction of travel.
I agree.

These last two weeks have probably been hectic for you, but you pulled it off. Good job smile
Back to top
Blitzorn
Fri Jun 12 2009, 05:12AM
Blitzorn Registered Member #2128 Joined: Thu May 21 2009, 03:17AM
Location: Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 58
It has been a bit nutty, but you know what?

I had a BLAST.
This has been one of the cooler and more educational experiences of my life which trust me, although i'm only 17, REALLY means something.

In the immortal words of my favorite cybernetic assassin, "I'll be back."

(insert station wagon coming through wall here)
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.