Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 34
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Triggered Spark Gaps...

1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Hon1nbo
Wed Apr 29 2009, 01:50AM Print
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 1042
ok, so I have decided to use a triggered Spark Gap for my Capacitor Pulse Bank, economical, powerful, simple...
well, I realized how much space my current design takes in my Cap Bank's Pelican Case installation, and want to make a smaller one, while still retaining my recycled parts for as much of my project as possible...

the first Pic is my current one with an Ignition Coil trigger making most of the bulk
the second Pic is my hope for a new unit, but I am unsure of how much power it could safely take (though I would be willing to replace the bolts and dome nuts with thicker ones, I hope it would not have to change much) - a penny is used for size reference...
the third Pic is the entire "trigatron" unit I want to make work, and a CM600 brick is used for reference (more on why that's on my workbench is for another time ; - )
the last Pic is the Pulse transformer I now want to use... I have used the think for CW operation for some time, but I feel it is time to use it as it was intended for...


1240969693 902 FT0 1st Gen Trigatron

1240969693 902 FT0 Cimg7689

1240969693 902 FT0 Cimg7690

1240969693 902 FT0 Cimg7691



How much power do you think I could safely pass through this newer gap design at around 1000V? just any ballpark estimate would be fine, but this is my first project of such a magnitude to use a triggered Spark Gap... I normally use SCRs, but I hate replacing them and I am going to need bigger ones than I have ever used...
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Apr 29 2009, 10:05PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
A newly patented (2007) trigger device that may interest you - that does away with a third pin - consists of a placing a momentary large over-voltage pulse on one of the electrodes by means of a transformer.

This does away with the third 'trigger' electrode, which is the element that requires the most frequent, and troublesome, replacement in trigatron circuits.

See: Trigger arrangement for a Marx generator
United States Patent 7170198

Link2

Back to top
Hon1nbo
Thu Apr 30 2009, 02:26AM
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 1042
I'm assuming that my HV Diodes on the Cap bank will have to be able to withstand this to protect the Caps?

Anyways I still would like to know how much Energy I can pump through a gap of the shown size (smaller one) without issues... I really hate that my current gap setup takes up more sqaure inches that four of my Caps!
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 30 2009, 03:03AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Find a copper wire table online, and go to the wire gauge that has the same thickness as the bolt shown in your lowest picture, and read off its current carrying capacity. Reduce this a little to take account of the screw thread and the different metals, and this will give you a rough 'ballpark figure'
Back to top
jpsmith123
Thu Apr 30 2009, 02:05PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Spark Gaps are inherently high energy devices.

Generally speaking, unless the associated conductors have a very small cross sectional area, the voltage dropped across the hardware will be only a small fraction of your capacitor voltage, thus the limit on how much single shot energy it can throughput depends mainly upon how often you'd like to repair/replace the electrodes (which in turn also depends on the electrode material and the geometry).

IOW, a small amount of material will be ablated from the arcing surfaces with each shot, so the gap properties will slowly change, eventually necessitating repair/replacement.

OTOH, if you're talking about high duty cycle operation, i.e., high average power, then, depending on your design, you may run into a thermal problem as well, in which case you may need convective cooling.

Somewhere I have some literature on spark gap design that gets into estimating such things as the power dissipated, efficiency, etc.

In any case, most commercial manufacturers use a copper/tungsten alloy for the arcing electrodes, and the design usually involves an insulated, pressurized case with slow gas flow, so that heat and contaminants can be carried away and the physical gap can be as small as possible to minimize the inductance and also the rise time.

Edit:

I just realized you stated your voltage is 1000 volts. Is that a mistake? Did you mean to say 10,000 volts?
Back to top
Hon1nbo
Thu Apr 30 2009, 02:18PM
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 1042
[quote]
Spark Gaps are inherently high energy devices.

Generally speaking, unless the associated conductors have a very small cross sectional area, the voltage dropped across the hardware will be only a small fraction of your capacitor voltage, thus the limit on how much single shot energy it can throughput depends mainly upon how often you'd like to repair/replace the electrodes (which in turn also depends on the electrode material and the geometry).

IOW, a small amount of material will be ablated from the arcing surfaces with each shot, so the gap properties will slowly change, eventually necessitating repair/replacement.

OTOH, if you're talking about high duty cycle operation, i.e., high average power, then, depending on your design, you may run into a thermal problem as well, in which case you may need convective cooling.

Somewhere I have some literature on spark gap design that gets into estimating such things as the power dissipated, efficiency, etc.

In any case, most commercial manufacturers use a copper/tungsten alloy for the arcing electrodes, and the design usually involves an insulated, pressurized case with slow gas flow, so that heat and contaminants can be carried away and the physical gap can be as small as possible to minimize the inductance and also the rise time.
[/quote1http://4hv.org/e107_plugins/forum/ forum_post.php?quote.68736241100581]

I would certainly not mind replacing the bolts every now and then, as they are cheap (and I can just get a contractor pack next time I go to the hardware store)... If I ever can, I will attempt to get tungsten electrodes, but I have actually thought about using something like a tungsten/Thorium alloy welding rod - since it has a doping of thorium the gap will form easier, but there are two things I am worried about: one is the fact it is a welding rod, and this is a spark gap unit; two is that the Thorium dopant might also cause the gap to not quench when it should... but being a capacitor bank I do not expect that to be too much of an issue.)

anyways... for my size bolts, which are 1/4" and around gauge 2, current charts state they can handle around 94 amps... I don't know if that will be enough... I can upgrade them if I have to... being my first High Energy Triggered Spark Gap I am still uncertain anbout a lot of things in it...
Back to top
jpsmith123
Thu Apr 30 2009, 02:36PM
jpsmith123 Registered Member #1321 Joined: Sat Feb 16 2008, 03:22AM
Location:
Posts: 843
Current carrying capacities listed in wire tables are based on acceptable temperature rise for a given physical arrangement (single wire, bundle of wires, multilayer transformer coil, etc.) usually with continuous current flow and no forced air cooling or anything.

Since yours will presumably be a low duty cycle, low average power application where you don't have to worry about things like a time and temperature based degradation of an organic insulator over a wire, you can put a lot more current through your conductors...you will not melt the conductors.
Back to top
Plasma Lover
Thu Apr 30 2009, 03:18PM
Plasma Lover Registered Member #1911 Joined: Mon Jan 05 2009, 06:30PM
Location: Salem, Oregon, USA
Posts: 165
The amperage rating for wire is for continuous operation. If it's a single pulse, sure, it'll heat 'em up a bit, but it's not going to make them explode at any reasonable power. If your bank is using less than 2KJ per pulse and it's not a rapid pulse, I would assume that you may need to change the bolts out somewhat frequently, but they won't melt your enclosure.

Here's a good idea - use an aluminum enclosure to hold the elctrodes - that way your box will be a heatsink! (And your box will make a short-circuit!)

My suggestion is to put it in a make-shift blast chamber and try it out.

;)
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Apr 30 2009, 03:51PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I should have made myself more clear, and said that any significant heating of a triggered gap will cause thermal expansion of the bolts, which may narrow the gap sufficiently to alter firing conditions for subsequent shots. They should thus be sized conservatively.

Unnecessary thermal stress is in any case to be viewed as objectionable from an engineering point of view.
Back to top
Hon1nbo
Thu Apr 30 2009, 07:19PM
Hon1nbo Registered Member #902 Joined: Sun Jul 15 2007, 08:17PM
Location: Pacific Northwest USA
Posts: 1042
Harry wrote ...

I should have made myself more clear, and said that any significant heating of a triggered gap will cause thermal expansion of the bolts, which may narrow the gap sufficiently to alter firing conditions for subsequent shots. They should thus be sized conservatively.

Unnecessary thermal stress is in any case to be viewed as objectionable from an engineering point of view.

ok then... I don't mind having to adjust the gaps a little... my trigger pulse is large enough to support a large range on gaps for the larger portion, and the other half of the assembly can't be that hard to do... at least by my standards.

as someone mentioned above, by the time I am done I will have well more than 2 KJ... I have a third Cap in the mail giving me 2.1 KJ for my larger caps, and the smaller caps add slightly more, but I can only get the larger caps one at a time... so I will have time to tune the setup before going full power.
Back to top
1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.