If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #135
Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
funny concept: "Most likely to be killed by MOT gauge" right under their avitar. It would be a bargraph display from green to yellow to red. Others would be able to vote and review you, course...mine would probably be red cuz I think I annoy some of you guys.
Registered Member #63
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:18AM
Location:
Posts: 1425
I'm sure any number of people would volunteer for membership-monitoring commitments (i.e. checking/approving/rejecting/justifying an "applications" board). I can't really imagine that out of malice or ignorance, low-quality apps would go through. (With zero moderating experience and zero moment in this discussion) I'd guess it's a bad case of "Aww, I don't want to reject his application... just let it through."
Of course, as you've highlighted, the problem of 'monitoring the monitors' surfaces, but with well-selected moderators in the first place (i.e. not idiots like myself, or bastards like my other self) it wouldn't be a problem, surely?
Another idea that would make interesting discussion (but would be an impractical move) is the idea of a pay-for-membership forum. This somewhat filters minors (and misers like me =), offsets the hosting costs, but could have undesirable effects too.
Registered Member #139
Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 11:01AM
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 358
Although I agree that charging for the service would deterr minors, it would make things difficult for people like myself who refuse a credit card. If enough people make comment about a user to a mod, then maybe something can be done. take that person aside, create a thread where we can put our opinions to that person, and see where it goes. Or, for obvious blatant disregard for the rules, just delete the user account.
Registered Member #27
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
The number of people signing up is not the problem, but on a given day 9 out of 10 people does not show up when it becomes clear that it is tiresome and boring.
We have almost 20 moderators but their combined effort was not able to cope with the influx of new members. What we learned from the last application process is that shared responsibility does not work well. Chris is moving in the right direction with a few dedicated people on the job so the blame would be easy to hand out when the job is not done properly. The question is if anyone is willing do the job, it is a thin line to balance and you may end up with everyone being unhappy with your effort.
Registered Member #229
Joined: Tue Feb 21 2006, 07:33PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 506
Let them select themselves. Make an online test, with a few tens of questions about electricity, safety rules and a warning with "i agree/dont agree' button. If they dont know anything about HV they just will learn to complete the test. Depending the score/number of points gained through the test, they are automatically rejected or accepted, just hiting the "Finish" button. If they fail, the test page will not accept never the same ID. In this way it is not need to have individuals to read all the aplications.
Or accept as learners all the applicants, but only the people that have already a good project can participate at the forum. The project has to be at least half realised, with well documented explanations. This will allow only the knowledgeable people to post here. The others can read the post and ask questions only in a restricted area of the forum.
Registered Member #177
Joined: Wed Feb 15 2006, 02:16PM
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 214
I was on the old application team (and would do it again, if you let me).
From what I see, the big weakness of this process is that on the old board the decission was made by one mod alone. Some realy nasty applications went through, which made clear that the ones writing them, haven't read the rules completly, or didn't understand them or didn't care.
I think applications would be good, but we need a system were 3 mods or so have to decide as a team.
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
That seems like a good idea madgyver. I reckon we could create an applications forum, make each wannabe user post an application with a poll attached to it, then the moderating team (and maybe any other existing 4hv users too) could use the poll to vote on whether the user should be allowed in.
If polls are a problem, we could use nominations. So the wannabe user creates his post and he needs to get 10 replies from unique existing users (or maybe moderators only) saying "Let him in" before we give him write permissions to the rest of the board.
I think the applicant should have to give references to work he has done in the past: either a website he has built, or stuff he has posted on other forums. That way we can see a track record. Unless that causes too much hassle with figuring out that the applicant really is who he says he is.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.