Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 25
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Good passive HV scope probe?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
speakerguy79
Tue Mar 17 2009, 12:32AM Print
speakerguy79 Registered Member #1460 Joined: Thu May 01 2008, 12:45AM
Location:
Posts: 19
Hi,

I have a Tek DPO3000 scope. It has an input limit of 300VRMS. Since I will likely be using 338VDC on my SSTC, with spikes and noise and garbage on top of that, I would like a HV probe to keep it 'safe'. Does anyone know of a good HV scope probe that doesn't break the bank? Scope is 300Mhz but the probe doesn't have to go that high, just high enough for a SSTC.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Tue Mar 17 2009, 10:30AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I have two of the Isoprobe 100:1 probes from Multi-Contact.
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Mar 17 2009, 05:55PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3141
Commercial high voltage 'scope probes aren't too expensive,

Commercial high voltage 'scope probes that can accept high voltage
at high frequency are VERY expensive.

Check the specifications of any HV probe that you intend to buy.
Back to top
kilovolt
Tue Mar 17 2009, 06:06PM
kilovolt Registered Member #2018 Joined: Tue Mar 10 2009, 09:56AM
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 74
I had some time ago a Tektronix P6015 high voltage high frequency probe, but I just rarely used it. Main problem with these probes used together with scopes is the earth grounding of the circuit.

Greets kilovolt wink
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Mar 17 2009, 06:31PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I've found that there's no keeping company between digital circuits and the more unruly high voltages, and so use a probe of my own invention employing an acorn pentode cathode follower to make a really good firewall that can't be punctured by flukey spikes coming down the line. Gain is about 0.95 up to a few hundred megacycles.

I have some sub-miniature pentodes, and intend to try these out in similar probes when time permits.

Back to top
tesla500
Tue Mar 17 2009, 07:50PM
tesla500 Registered Member #347 Joined: Sat Mar 25 2006, 08:26AM
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 106
I use these at work and at home, Digkey part # 290-1052-ND. 100x 250MHz 1kV, ~$67 CDN. You can get them cheaper on ebay, ~$75 for 2.

Harry is right about higher voltages, you just can't get good off the shelf probes for measuring very high voltage high frequency signals.

David
Back to top
Sulaiman
Tue Mar 17 2009, 09:06PM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3141
I use a P6015 at home,
although the bandwidth extends flat (2%) to 50 MHz
the voltage rating drops off -6db/octave above 100 kHz.

If you consider the P6015 3pF input capacitance at 20 kVrms 100 kHz
that's 37 mA rms loading !
Back to top
Proud Mary
Tue Mar 17 2009, 11:09PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Sulaiman wrote ...

If you consider the P6015 3pF input capacitance at 20 kVrms 100 kHz
that's 37 mA rms loading !

A carefully chosen miniature electrometer valve can let you have Cin<250fF with meticulous design - g1 lead out must form the actual probe tip for such a figure to be possible. DC impedances of good electrometer valves can equal or better any solid state solutions of which I'm aware, so long as no effort is spared in attention to detail, but valves will look kindly on very steep high voltage interference transients of the kind that will puncture, I suppose, all but special military 'hardened' FETs.


Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Mar 18 2009, 10:35AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Harry, are you suggesting we make our own scope probes out of vacuum tubes? :O How does that solve the 100:1 divider problem?
Back to top
Proud Mary
Wed Mar 18 2009, 12:53PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Steve McConner wrote ...

Harry, are you suggesting we make our own scope probes out of vacuum tubes? :O How does that solve the 100:1 divider problem?

There's a place for fringe opinions, even unsound ones, if they are well meant. cheesey

From my beginner's perspective, the problems of very high voltage measurement seem so fraught with difficulty as to need, on occasion, equipm,ent created to solve each individual case. Where the obvious solutions, resistive and capacitive dividers, rotary electrostatic force meters, calibrated attenuators and such and are unsuitable one may have no choice but to construct equipment to make a particular measurement.

I'm not so batty as to expect more than polite interest in my antique engineering proposals, which, in any case, I usually present with comedic good grace, but here in 4HV I do have the chance to learn what has happened since the rise and fall of the 807, and am currently somewhere in the 1970s, a great leap forward for me. smile

I should much rather have my many misunderstandings of the art pointed out in common honour than be left with misconceptions, and poorly thought out analyses that provide no exercise for synapses heading towards Omega.




Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.