Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 30
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Barry (70)
Snowcat (37)
wylie (43)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Tesla's Wireless System

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
GeordieBoy
Mon Feb 23 2009, 10:42AM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
> In order for a Tesla world wireless system to achieve even 1% efficiency it first has to overcome what might be called the "core loss," which, according to Tesla is the 75,000 watts that is needed to resonate the earth.

I suspect that most HV experimenters on here don't have the power service or the funds to work on a project requiring 75kW of input for 750W of useable output power. So this is probably not the best forum for such a discussion.

-Richie,
Back to top
Coronafix
Mon Feb 23 2009, 11:08AM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Gary Peterson wrote ...

A number of individuals and groups have demonstrated that electrical energy can be transferred from a Tesla coil transmitter to a Tesla coil receiver over distances exceeding a few wavelengths, and this without ordinary radio waves being significantly involved.

Can you point the way to these experiments, I would be interested to see them.
I don't see why this discussion has to be political, having to choose a side in what people
believe or disbelieve. This is science people! Follow the experimental evidence. If Gary has something
to share, I don't see why he should be shot down. My hero was Nikola Tesla, but I don't get all offended
when people call him a nut case. In my opinion I don't think that Tesla ever meant longitudinal waves through the air
but instead waves through the ground.
On a side note, Gary Leyh said that he was surprised at how far his wireless robot could go.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Feb 23 2009, 11:27AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yeah, let's see these "number of individuals".

The modern version of Tesla's system, which does actually work, is a microwave beam directed at a rectifying antenna (rectenna). NASA have a UAV powered this way, and there were proposals to beam down power from orbiting solar power stations.

More generally, cell phones and communications satellites have delivered all the promises that Tesla made for his World Wireless System, and more. The World System is already here, it just didn't get implemented in quite the way Tesla predicted.

Or maybe it did, given that all radio equipment relies on tuned circuits and resonance... I like to think that the modern wired world is a result of later generations of experimenters trying to follow up on Tesla's World System vision. They just couldn't get the power transmission bit to work well.


As for the 75,000 watt "core loss", I tend to go with Paul Nicholson when he identifies the losses with the Q factor of the Schumann resonances. By this model, it won't suddenly start working like a champ once a certain loss is overcome: the loss will always be a constant percentage of the input power. Probably about 99%...
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon Feb 23 2009, 01:10PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Perhaps someone with the know-how could make a mathematical model of Tesla's concept, and see how it runs.
Back to top
Gary Peterson
Mon Feb 23 2009, 03:17PM
Gary Peterson Registered Member #1983 Joined: Wed Feb 18 2009, 03:49PM
Location: Breckenridge, Colorado
Posts: 9
I'm going to be busy with other matters over the next few days and will not be able to respond to everyone individually, right away.

Please read A DISCUSSION OF TESLA'S WIRELESS WORK at http://www.teslaradio.com/pages/discussion.htm and then follow the top links on the APPENDIX page of TESLA RADIO : A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM FOR THE POST MODERN AGE at http://www.teslaradio.com/pages/appendix.htm. This will help bring you up to speed with where I am presently in my research.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon Feb 23 2009, 03:45PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
I suppose by "Q factor of the Schumann Resonances" that Steve must have intended the Q of the atmospheric waveguide, rather than the resonances themselves.
Back to top
Chris Russell
Mon Feb 23 2009, 04:06PM
Chris Russell ... not Russel!
Registered Member #1 Joined: Thu Jan 26 2006, 12:18AM
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1052
Coronafix wrote ...

In my opinion I don't think that Tesla ever meant longitudinal waves through the air
but instead waves through the ground.

Steve's most excellent document above addresses that concept quite nicely. Give it a read if you haven't yet. It talks about the relationship between ground waves and radio waves, and addresses longitudinal waves as well.

Harry wrote ...

Perhaps someone with the know-how could make a mathematical model of Tesla's concept, and see how it runs.

But that's been the problem all along, hasn't it? Tesla claims that Maxwell's equations don't apply for some reason, so we're conveniently left without the ability to construct a mathematical model. It's easy enough to plug a pair of Tesla coils into NEC4 or similar, and accurately model the poor performance that Tesla's system exhibits, but advocates of the system will simply claim that the math is wrong.

Steve McConner wrote ...

As for the 75,000 watt "core loss", I tend to go with Paul Nicholson when he identifies the losses with the Q factor of the Schumann resonances. By this model, it won't suddenly start working like a champ once a certain loss is overcome: the loss will always be a constant percentage of the input power. Probably about 99%...

Probably much worse. The Schumann resonances are not particularly difficult to detect with enough patience. Simply filling a large TC secondary with some insulated iron rods or bars would likely be enough when connected to a good sound card. You can then see the quite wide, low-Q smear that makes up the first Schumann resonance, and some of its harmonics. Nicholson wasn't joking when he described the Q as hopelessly low.

Gary Peterson wrote ...


In closing, allow me to say that my purpose in starting this thread is not to reopen the discussions of whether the system works, but encourage HV experimenters in ongoing investigations of it.


In closing, I will invite you to re-read the rules regarding pseudoscience on this site. 4hv.org isn't going to play host to this sort of nonsense, wherein some shadowy figures claim success in contravening the laws of physics as we understand them, with no evidence or mathematics to back it up. This scenario has repeated itself many times, and it never ends well.
Back to top
GeordieBoy
Mon Feb 23 2009, 04:16PM
GeordieBoy Registered Member #1232 Joined: Wed Jan 16 2008, 10:53PM
Location: Doon tha Toon!
Posts: 881
This all sounds very similar to the notorious Cross Field Antenna (CFA.)

Link2

For those not familiar, this is also claimed to raise two fingers in the direction of Maxwell and radiate impossibly well for its diminutive size.

There's strangely few practical installations in operation though, considering all of the advantages supposedly touted for the invention.

-Richie,
Back to top
Proud Mary
Mon Feb 23 2009, 04:26PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Chris Russell wrote ...
The Schumann resonances are not particularly difficult to detect with enough patience. Simply filling a large TC secondary with some insulated iron rods or bars would likely be enough when connected to a good sound card.

Indeed, Hans Michlmayr over at the excellent Waves Below 22kHz site has built such an apparatus:

Link2
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Feb 23 2009, 05:08PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I have to be nice about the CFA, I work with one of the guys who invented it suprised
I asked him to build me a 3.5MHz one for the attic, and he's been strangely quiet ever since.

I don't really understand what distinction Harry is trying to make here. Resonances have Q, and resonant cavities have resonances.

One cavity can have several resonant modes each with its own frequency and Q factor.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.