Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 21
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
gentoo_daemon (43)


Next birthdays
04/21 kilovolt (50)
04/21 wannabegeekTC (50)
04/21 Elijah (34)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

What is the best portable music player around?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
scrooch
Sun Oct 05 2008, 12:44AM Print
scrooch Registered Member #908 Joined: Wed Jul 18 2007, 05:53AM
Location:
Posts: 49
So which music player has the best sound quality?.And i mean not when listening to mp3s.When listenning to lossless files all the components in the player matter, from the DAC to the headphone amplifier.Is the ipod still the best in this sense?
Back to top
J. Aaron Holmes
Sun Oct 05 2008, 04:09AM
J. Aaron Holmes Registered Member #477 Joined: Tue Jun 20 2006, 11:51PM
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 546
If you really care, you'll probably search for reviews, tests, research elsewhere. At best, that's what somebody here will do for you (not me). At worst, somebody will give you a biased opinion based on whatever they happen to own.

Another take on your question might be: If you care so much about getting the absolute finest in audio quality, why are you even looking at things like iPods and Zunes? They're for the increasingly introverted audio-junkie masses who can't live without a 24x7 music fix, not the true audiophiles.

Cheers,
Aaron, N7OE
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Oct 05 2008, 01:11PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I liked the old iRiver IHP-120, running Rockbox. That is my personal biased opinion smile

On regular pop/rock/dance music, I don't notice any great difference between 256k MP3 and lossless, even on my home studio system.

I'm an old fart like Aaron, who believes that good music is worth sitting down and listening to properly, preferably on something with tubes sticking out of it :D
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sun Oct 05 2008, 02:14PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Steve McConner wrote ...

On regular pop/rock/dance music, I don't notice any great difference between 256k MP3 and lossless, even on my home studio system.
Most people don't realise that with a portable player, most quality drop apparently happens in the earphones. Using a quality MP3 encoder, with VBR @~135kbs you'll get maybe 1% drop in quality but 90% drop in filesize, not mentioning that battery life will be improved and that background noise will mask the encoding noise anyway.

So IMO, lossless is totally overkill for a portable player, unless you're going to blast it through a top quality stereo system or monster headphones (even for this purpose, high-bitrate VBR MP3 is sufficient).

With 99% of the players on the market, you're not going to hear any audible difference in the outputs without any EQ or effect, using the same phones. Maybe there is measurable difference but not audible.
So I would rather focus on things like battery life, features (formats, want/don't want a big colorful display etc.), look, output power, and of course price.

Just my extremely biased advice tongue

Back to top
Experimentonomen
Sun Oct 05 2008, 04:30PM
Experimentonomen Registered Member #941 Joined: Sun Aug 05 2007, 10:09AM
Location: in a swedish junk pile
Posts: 497
I´d say the one you build yourself to your specs.
Back to top
Dr. Drone
Sun Oct 05 2008, 09:59PM
Dr. Drone Registered Member #290 Joined: Mon Mar 06 2006, 08:24PM
Location:
Posts: 1673
shades
Back to top
scrooch
Sun Oct 05 2008, 10:37PM
scrooch Registered Member #908 Joined: Wed Jul 18 2007, 05:53AM
Location:
Posts: 49
Dr. Kilovolt wrote ...

Steve McConner wrote ...

On regular pop/rock/dance music, I don't notice any great difference between 256k MP3 and lossless, even on my home studio system.
Most people don't realise that with a portable player, most quality drop apparently happens in the earphones. Using a quality MP3 encoder, with VBR @~135kbs you'll get maybe 1% drop in quality but 90% drop in filesize, not mentioning that battery life will be improved and that background noise will mask the encoding noise anyway.

So IMO, lossless is totally overkill for a portable player, unless you're going to blast it through a top quality stereo system or monster headphones (even for this purpose, high-bitrate VBR MP3 is sufficient).

With 99% of the players on the market, you're not going to hear any audible difference in the outputs without any EQ or effect, using the same phones. Maybe there is measurable difference but not audible.
So I would rather focus on things like battery life, features (formats, want/don't want a big colorful display etc.), look, output power, and of course price.

Just my extremely biased advice tongue



well i agree there with Dr. kilovolt.
Headphones do make a BIG difference.becuase i have the basic ipod earphones and a pair of etymotic er4Ps. And they ARE different.But most of you disagreeing to the fact that an ipod cannot get audiophile quality is a bit sad.

an ipod loaded with lossless content connected to this
Link2
which then can then be connected to a dedicated DAC box would be good as any CD player out there.
anyone disagreeing with me?

and thats a nice combo dr.spark. though my love affair with motorolla phones died long time ago when my phone started crashing.

Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Oct 06 2008, 09:48AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Link2 Awesome. Wadia finally break the $10k barrier and make electronics for mortals smile Too bad it doesn't fit the definition of "portable", or if it does, my old laptop with a M-Audio Transit does too.

All lossless codecs sound identical by definition, but does anyone know how the sound quality of different lossy codecs compares? I know the latest Lame MP3 encoder sounds loads better than a 5 year old version at the same bitrate, and the encoder built into my iRiver for recording to MP3 is chronically bad.

But what about the decoder? Does a floating point version running on your PC sound better than a fixed-point one on your MP3 player's ARM or ColdFire, which lacks a FPU? I'd swear that MP3s have more decoding noise when I listen on my MP3 player, and I remember one of the arguments in favour of Ogg Vorbis was that the decoder was all fixed-point arithmetic.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Mon Oct 06 2008, 10:56AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Steve McConner wrote ...

But what about the decoder? Does a floating point version running on your PC sound better than a fixed-point one on your MP3 player's ARM or ColdFire, which lacks a FPU? I'd swear that MP3s have more decoding noise when I listen on my MP3 player, and I remember one of the arguments in favour of Ogg Vorbis was that the decoder was all fixed-point arithmetic.

I may be wrong but I think that even a simple non-dithering 16bit decoder will have more than 90dB dynamic range (the maximum dynamic range for 16bit seems to be ~96dB), which is totally overkill for any mp3 player. In fact it is enough for listening in a relatively quiet envirnonment on high quality equipment.

What I wanted to say is that the decoders will NOT sound different unless there is a flaw/bug in them, without any DSP turned on.
However, few players (such as my x years old Creative Muvo) have problems with noise at low volume settings, in my case it is the interference from the CPU. You'll hear this only when in absulutely quiet place, in normal use it is inaudible.

I say buy the player which you like the features of, buy good phones and don't worry about decoder quality, as there will be no audible differences between vast majority of the players.

Edit: I forgot to mention that the output power of course matters too, if you get a player with low output power, you might get distortions at high volume levels or with open headphones.


Back to top
Bjørn
Mon Oct 06 2008, 12:41PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
But what about the decoder? Does a floating point version running on your PC sound better than a fixed-point one on your MP3 player's ARM or ColdFire, which lacks a FPU?
A more efficient decoder allows the CPU to spend more time idle to save power. The battery lifetime is listed in the specifications, the round off errors of the decoding algorithm is not. So you can assume that some people will trade accuracy for longer battery life to increase sales or in some cases to use a cheaper CPU without enough computing power to decode without errors.

I'd swear that MP3s have more decoding noise when I listen on my MP3 player,
Swearing without a proper double blind test is not advisable, you have a strong tendency to hear what you want to hear. A proper test would also be difficult since you need access to the digital data since the analog output is not a valid as a comparison for decoding noise.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.