Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 60
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

The development of an MMC...

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
envytea
Mon Aug 25 2008, 08:27PM Print
envytea Registered Member #1653 Joined: Mon Aug 25 2008, 08:02PM
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2
This is my first posting, so, "Hello to all!"

I am building my first Tesla coil. It is a relatively small one: NST is 7500v, 20mA, 150W; 3" secondary. I am deciding on how to go about building the capacitor bank. I am planning on using polyester film caps, but I am unsure of the layout. It seems that several coilers recommend having multiple strings (>4) of caps in parallel for the MMC. This is to better distribute the current. However, since my TC is rather low-power, can I get away with less strings in parallel? I am considering even making the MMC with 2 or 3 parallel strings. I am just trying not to use too many materials and, hopefully, save some money.

Any and all advise would be much appreciated. I will probably post more questions in the near future, mostly regarding this MMC. Thank you in advance.

Later,
envytea


Note to moderator
: I honestly tried to search previous postings for information relevant to my question. However, a key term "MMC" had too short of a string to be a legitimate query. I apologize if this question is redundant in the history of this forum.
Back to top
Kizmo
Mon Aug 25 2008, 08:59PM
Kizmo Registered Member #599 Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
First thing: polyester is crap with high frequences. Go for polypropylene caps.
Back to top
envytea
Mon Aug 25 2008, 09:50PM
envytea Registered Member #1653 Joined: Mon Aug 25 2008, 08:02PM
Location: Chicago, Il
Posts: 2
Thanks Kizmo. I am now leaning toward using Cornell Dubilier metalized polypropylene caps.

My target capacitance is 0.007uF for the MMC. If I use 3 strings of 9 0.022uF/2000vdc rated caps, the MMC will have a value of 0.0073uF/18000v. Is this a decent choice? Would it be better to have the total capacitance slightly above or below the targeted value?

Back to top
Myke
Mon Aug 25 2008, 10:14PM
Myke Registered Member #540 Joined: Mon Feb 19 2007, 07:49PM
Location: MIT
Posts: 969
I would say above because of LTR cap choices are good right?
Back to top
Coronafix
Mon Aug 25 2008, 10:55PM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Your resonant cap value will be 7nF, so you should go 1.4 times higher than this to have a Larger than resonant cap value.
Hence you should be looking for about 10nF in your cap.
You could go 3 strings of 6 of those caps (.022uF 2000V)
giving you a rating of 12000V @11nF.
Back to top
Seoul_lasers
Tue Aug 26 2008, 01:54AM
Seoul_lasers Registered Member #1630 Joined: Sat Aug 09 2008, 11:36AM
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 115
Coronafix wrote ...

Your resonant cap value will be 7nF, so you should go 1.4 times higher than this to have a Larger than resonant cap value.
Hence you should be looking for about 10nF in your cap.
You could go 3 strings of 6 of those caps (.022uF 2000V)
giving you a rating of 12000V @11nF.

actually I would be going 2.5-3x the input value of AC voltage.
7500Vac - 18.75- 21Kvdc rating.. this is standard practise. The capacitors you need are Polyethylene and on a personal bias CDE942Cs are the best suited for the job because of their self healing capabilities.
Nice thing is your tank cap is pretty small. CDEs will last years if you treat them properly!
Back to top
Coronafix
Tue Aug 26 2008, 03:39AM
Coronafix Registered Member #160 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 02:07AM
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 938
Seoul_lasers wrote ...

actually I would be going 2.5-3x the input value of AC voltage.
7500Vac - 18.75- 21Kvdc rating.. this is standard practise.

I believe this to be overkill, when using LTR the voltages are never going get that high on the capacitor.
I use 24kV for my 15kV NST, and have even used 21kV. I have never had a problem.
The CDE942C series is well tried and tested as the best for TC use. That said, I actually
use the 940C30S47K-F which has a 3kV rating on each cap. The reason I do this is because
those other capacitors aren't available from my supplier in Australia, and it works out cheaper.
Back to top
Seoul_lasers
Tue Aug 26 2008, 05:42AM
Seoul_lasers Registered Member #1630 Joined: Sat Aug 09 2008, 11:36AM
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 115
Coronafix wrote ...

Seoul_lasers wrote ...

actually I would be going 2.5-3x the input value of AC voltage.
7500Vac - 18.75- 21Kvdc rating.. this is standard practise.

I believe this to be overkill, when using LTR the voltages are never going get that high on the capacitor.
I use 24kV for my 15kV NST, and have even used 21kV. I have never had a problem.
The CDE942C series is well tried and tested as the best for TC use. That said, I actually
use the 940C30S47K-F which has a 3kV rating on each cap. The reason I do this is because
those other capacitors aren't available from my supplier in Australia, and it works out cheaper.

I would stay away from 940C caps as they tend to fail at the axial leads
(ends) . If you use the JAVATC calc and go to the section on MMC design you will see what I am reffering to about the voltage rating needing to be at least 2.5x. There is a lot of stress from the capacitors rapidly discharging and this translates into heating of the dielectric. It is best to have some extra voltage rating than not, less stress on them/
Back to top
Anon01
Tue Sept 02 2008, 10:26PM
Anon01 Registered Member #1589 Joined: Sun Jul 13 2008, 06:40PM
Location:
Posts: 70
So, what is the resolution on the caps listed? I ordered some from Newark and I received them, but completely forgot about how to construct the MMC, do I use VDC(3 000V), VAC(750V), or the average of the two values(1 875V)? In my scenario it runs to be, using VDC rating, 6 caps per string, giving me 18 000V with a 8 000V transformer. It's not >8 000*2.5 giving me 21 000V, but more than the peak available(V*sqrt(2)), which gives me 11 313.7085V. Am I doing it correctly?

If it feels like I am taking over the tread, say so and I will make a new one. I thought it would be okay since this one is dead, and my question is relevant to these specific cap's specs.
Back to top
coillah
Wed Sept 03 2008, 12:03AM
coillah Registered Member #1517 Joined: Wed Jun 04 2008, 06:55AM
Location: Chico CA
Posts: 304
In an oscillating system you need to use the VAC rating for the caps + the safety factor. It appears as if you have done that, but are a tad bit under the rating for safety (aka cap longevity), IMHO.

There have been several discussions on what the appropriate amount of overrating is for a MMC voltage ratings. I'd say that you're just about right with your rating.

You can build it cheap and worry about the caps failing or you could build it so you never even consider the caps :)
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.