Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 19
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
No birthdays today

Next birthdays
07/09 Avi (41)
07/09 Jannick Hagen (15)
07/10 Sparcz (69)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: High Voltage
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Improved single transistor flyback driver

Move Thread LAN_403
Antonio
Sun May 25 2008, 11:18PM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
To determine the voltage precisely, produce sparks between balls. The spark length between points depends on many details, and is easily 3 times longer.
This is 20 kV:
Link2

A good formula for the voltage for a spark between two identical balls is:

V=E*4*d/(d/R+1+sqrt((d/R+1)^2+8))

E=30000 V/cm
d=spark length (cm)
R=ball radius (cm)
(sqrt=square root)

1 cm sparks between balls with 2 cm radius gives 25523 V
Back to top
Spedy
Wed May 28 2008, 02:42AM
Spedy Registered Member #964 Joined: Wed Aug 22 2007, 12:39AM
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 134
Dr. Monsterarc wrote ...

Here is the promised run with a DC flyback
Link2
Approx. 40kV. I used: 390R/2W, 10(!)R/6W, 8 pri. turns, 3 feedback turns, 0.56uF cap, KD606 transistor (made by "Tesla", long discontinued, but it's the best transistor for the single transistor driver I ever had...) gets just little warm after short runs.

I'll try to remove some primary turns and set the operating point so I get more kV out with the same power...







So you mean the 390R/2W at the 'top' of the schem. and the 10R/6W at the bottom, right?
Back to top
Shaun
Wed May 28 2008, 03:55AM
Shaun Registered Member #690 Joined: Tue May 08 2007, 03:47AM
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 616
Antonio, where on earth did you find that formula!? That's a nice one; it sure takes things further than just 1.1kv/mm like i usually use to "measure" voltage.

I think it deserves this though, for ease of understanding:


1211946903 690 FT37658 Voltage
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Wed May 28 2008, 06:09AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Spedy wrote ...

So you mean the 390R/2W at the 'top' of the schem. and the 10R/6W at the bottom, right?
yeah

---
what I found out: More feedback turns=more power (but not necesarilly more voltage). Decreasing the value of bottom resistor results in more power and voltage, but the resistor WILL get very hot if you get it too small. The top resistor has minimal effect on performance, so it is best to use the highest value that allows for reliable start-up.
Bigger capacitors tend to produce hotter arcs possibly with decreased output voltage.


Back to top
quicksilver
Wed May 28 2008, 02:27PM
quicksilver Registered Member #1408 Joined: Fri Mar 21 2008, 03:49PM
Location: Oracle, AZ
Posts: 679
Dr. Monsterarc wrote ...

Decreasing the value of bottom resistor results in more power and voltage, but the resistor WILL get very hot if you get it too small. The top resistor has minimal effect on performance, so it is best to use the highest value that allows for reliable start-up.
Bigger capacitors tend to produce hotter arcs possibly with decreased output voltage.


You bring up a very interesting point from what I am just studying. When I was looking at the circuit I believe those resistors to be functioning in parallel even though they exist in a series of two (one after another). If I'm correct and they are functioning in parallel, their collective value will be lower than the lowest one of the two.


Example: We have two resistors, a 22 ohm & a 470 which = 492ohm but the actual resistance would be 21 ohm if they are used as parallel with our circuit. But if we didn't have a 22 & 470 but a 92 & a 400 ohm we would have 75.1 total resistance. I tried playing with the values and that gave me the idea that they were functioning in parallel. If I'm right we could use two resistors & depending upon the values of each those choices would determine the functionality. So this concept playing itself out to the fullest - if we had a 600 & a 20 ohm, our total resistance would be 19.3 ohms....even less than the 470 & 22 original design.

{I also was wondering what you meant by the term "big" in capacitors; voltage or storage...? As I'd like to experiment with that.}
Back to top
Spedy
Thu May 29 2008, 12:10AM
Spedy Registered Member #964 Joined: Wed Aug 22 2007, 12:39AM
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 134
Hmm, this could present a problem for me. What if I paralleled a ton of resistors of the same value to get a higher wattage, would the resistance change? Ex: 10x 10ohms in parallel would = less than 10ohms?
Back to top
Tesladownunder
Thu May 29 2008, 12:56AM
Tesladownunder Registered Member #10 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 09:45AM
Location: Bunbury, Australia
Posts: 1424
This circuit has been around for a long time. I got my circuit from Sam Barros' site and made it up in 2002. Draws 3 A at 20V with 2N3055 for 1/2 inch spark.

TDU
1212022561 10 FT37658 Tv Flyback
Back to top
Antonio
Thu May 29 2008, 01:14AM
Antonio Registered Member #834 Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
Shaun wrote ...

Antonio, where on earth did you find that formula!? That's a nice one; it sure takes things further than just 1.1kv/mm like i usually use to "measure" voltage.

I think it deserves this though, for ease of understanding:


1211946903 690 FT37658 Voltage


The formula comes from this document ("North report"):
Link2
It is said there that the formula is exact, but it isn't. It is a good approximation, however. The exact expression has an infinite series.
Back to top
flannelhead
Mon Jun 16 2008, 05:43AM
flannelhead Registered Member #952 Joined: Mon Aug 13 2007, 11:07AM
Location: Finland
Posts: 388
I made a 555 based single MOSFET driver and started with a 440nF cap across the FET. The arc started at 5mm and stretched to 25mm. Then I removed 220nF from the capacitance and the arcs started at 20mm and drawed to 50mm! So tuning is very important.
Back to top
coffeetable
Wed Oct 21 2009, 06:18PM
coffeetable Registered Member #2443 Joined: Wed Oct 21 2009, 06:08PM
Location:
Posts: 1
Apologies for the thread necromancy, but I figured it was better than posting an all-new thread just for my question;

I'm a newbie. I built the 2n3055 circuit on the wiki, it worked, but they were right to say it leaves you wanting more. So I tried to build this one, with the materials to hand.

The materials at hand are a 2SD1555 transistor (built in damper diode, ~5V threshold voltage) and a 12V power supply. And it doesn't work.

My suspicion is that I'm not delivering enough voltage to turn the transistor on, but I've got no idea how to modify the circuit to fix this. Can anyone help?

(explainations of why the changes you suggest would fix it would be appreciated as well, so that I can actually start to understand what I'm building)

Thanks
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.