Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 75
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

CCPS (Capacitor Charging Power Supply)

Move Thread LAN_403
Marko
Sun Sept 09 2007, 11:17AM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Some awesome copper work over here, and really admirable low-inductance design.

Regarding supply transients, I don't believe they've ever caused that much trouble as you guys believe.

You should be able to absorb them with TVS's and judge the dissipation from them; I don't think it will be a lot.


Regarding Jacob's ladders.. do you guys draw arcs directly from the transformer (no doubler, filter)? How do you keep ZCS then? I mean, spark behavior is quite chaotic.

Back to top
Finn Hammer
Sun Sept 09 2007, 12:33PM
Finn Hammer Registered Member #205 Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
Marko wrote ...

Some awesome copper work over here, and really admirable low-inductance design.
Thanks! As you maby know, we are both toolmakers, so the metal work comes easy.
Marko wrote ...

Regarding supply transients, I don't believe they've ever caused that much trouble as you guys believe.
The mosfets and the IGBT`s can avalance those spikes, at the expence of heat. I think the first bridge that blew, did so, trying to snub some really nasty spikes, by avalancing, which at that time were lower frequency, meaning that they were wider and more powerfull.
Marko wrote ...

You should be able to absorb them with TVS's and judge the dissipation from them; I don't think it will be a lot.
No doubt that would be possible, but only to some extent. From what we have seen, a TVS can only snub a 100% ringing down to 50%.
This way, we don`t have to snub at all.
Marko wrote ...

Regarding Jacob's ladders.. do you guys draw arcs directly from the transformer (no doubler, filter)? How do you keep ZCS then? I mean, spark behavior is quite chaotic.


Yes, we drive them directly.
ZCS is acheived by design. It is inherent in the series resonant topology.

Steve Conner wrote ...

Hi Finn & Daniel,


I'm also playing with those white Semikron IGBTs, and I've also noticed some fairly serious ringing on the bus even at low DC bus voltages. Maybe they are really fast suprised
I think they are very fast smile
I hope you will show the combination of gate waveform and voltage waveform that you end up with.

Cheers, Finn Hammer
Back to top
Marko
Sun Sept 09 2007, 12:46PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Yes, we drive them directly.
ZCS is acheived by design. It is inherent in the series resonant topology.

From all I learned by now the supply ZCS's only into a capacitive load.

With resistive load the resonant frequency of the primary circuit is always going to be lower than this (I can be like 100% sure from my observations) and heavily dependent on load/arc size.
Back to top
Finn Hammer
Sun Sept 09 2007, 03:50PM
Finn Hammer Registered Member #205 Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
Marko wrote ...

From all I learned by now the supply ZCS's only into a capacitive load.

With resistive load the resonant frequency of the primary circuit is always going to be lower than this (I can be like 100% sure from my observations) and heavily dependent on load/arc size.
You have been into this before. Could you please describe in detail, (Schematic, pictures, spice file, scope shots) what circuit you made these observations in?

Cheers, Finn Hammer
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sun Sept 09 2007, 03:55PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Finn, I forgot to ask, what Semikron IGBT bricks are you using? Mine are the SKM300GB123D.
Back to top
Finn Hammer
Sun Sept 09 2007, 05:46PM
Finn Hammer Registered Member #205 Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
Steve Conner wrote ...

Finn, I forgot to ask, what Semikron IGBT bricks are you using? Mine are the SKM300GB123D.

Steve,
They are SKM 400GB124D

Pretty cool bricks.

Chers, Finn Hammer
Back to top
Steve Ward
Mon Sept 10 2007, 02:25AM
Steve Ward Registered Member #146 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 04:21AM
Location: Austin Tx
Posts: 1055
Finn,

While the slow switching of the gate might give pretty square waves it comes at the cost of increased switching loss. Luckily you can finely tune the thing to get pretty good ZCS.

I think the 50% overshoot you see is in fact very common when using these brick sized IGBTs. The reason being is that they have a pretty large internal inductance (relatively speaking when compared with a TO-247). And as you have found, using a snubber does help, but you still have something like 20-30nH snubber L and another 20-30nH (for newer bricks) or 50-100nH (for older ones like the CM300's i use) of IGBT inductance. I believe it is due to this that most brick datasheets give their example ratings with only 600V applied to 1200V devices (because the overshoot will almost always be large).

So as Conner said, you really should be tuning your gate R for best device efficiency and not just for looks (im adding that second part).
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Sept 10 2007, 08:49AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, if the stray inductance were mostly inside the brick, the ringing waveform should be bigger on the output terminal than on the DC bus terminals. Does that match up with what you saw, Finn?

As far as the seriousness of spikes goes, I believe that as long as the energy stored in the stray inductance (0.5*L*I^2) is small compared to the IGBT's avalanche rating, and the power dissipated through avalanching is small compared to the device's rated dissipation, it should be OK. Of course, for devices with no avalanche rating all bets are off! :(

I think the 124 series are faster still than the 123. rolleyes
Back to top
Marko
Mon Sept 10 2007, 12:57PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
You have been into this before. Could you please describe in detail, (Schematic, pictures, spice file, scope shots) what circuit you made these observations in?

Yes, but I'm rather going to open another thread than hijack this up.
My ''observations'' involve royer converters and are about what I thought to be 'basic transformer theory'. And described behavior of your CCPS is 'odd' from that point of view.
My idea of it was consistent with Steve's explanation so I thought I'm OK.

I never built anything like CCPS and can't by any way claim I have a clue what I'm talking about :(
Back to top
Finn Hammer
Mon Sept 10 2007, 06:49PM
Finn Hammer Registered Member #205 Joined: Sat Feb 18 2006, 11:59AM
Location: Skørping, Denmark
Posts: 741
Steve Conner wrote ...

Well, if the stray inductance were mostly inside the brick, the ringing waveform should be bigger on the output terminal than on the DC bus terminals. Does that match up with what you saw, Finn?

Of course, for devices with no avalanche rating all bets are off! :(


Yes, I do beleive there was more ringing on the output terminals, but I am not sure, and right now the ringing is back bad, snubbers are frying the resistors and everything is sort of "hot". Have some debugging to do before i can answer that with scopeshots.

Semikron don`t mention the word avalanche in their datasheets.
They say "Non punch through" though, with a little imagination that could be read as an avalanche ability.
Anyone have an opinion about that?

Cheers, Finn Hammer
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.