If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
We all know the UV spectrum has some hazards associated with it.
There products dumped into the "COVID-19" crisis and are UV based. do we have any independent data on hazard vs effectiveness? My classes were canceled so i dont have access to the college lab. but id like to put together a method to test them.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Do you mean UVC exposure levels to kill viruses, injure human skin and eyes, or damage upholstery and paint? I think the numbers have been well known for decades. At work they are practicing with a mobile robot bearing a germicidal lamp head, to make rounds at night when no people are in the building.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
klugesmith wrote ...
Do you mean UVC exposure levels to kill viruses, injure human skin and eyes, or damage upholstery and paint? I think the numbers have been well known for decades.
yes like this one here:
Dont LEDs suck for this purpose, and the mercury ones are too dangerous right ??
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
I would guess the LED's suck for that, but had never heard of LED's at UVC wavelengths.
What makes plain old germicidal lamps dangerous? Risk of cuts from glass shards if they break? T5's with bi-pin ends and clear non-fluorescent tubes have been in use for many decades.
Very efficient source of 254 nm, which is close to the most potent wavelength for damaging DNA. No more mercury than a fluorescent lamp of the same size. One application in 1970's and 1980's was EPROM erasers, which used ordinary germicidal lamps. Of course the light can burn your skin, or the surface of cornea if your eye is exposed.
This site gives some numbers for UVC exposure to kill germs. Left as an exercise for you is safety limits for UVC exposure to people.
I think a variant is "ozone" lamps, with differently formulated tube to let out the 185 nm. That's in a wavelength range called Vacuum UV, because it doesn't take much air to block it.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
I was thinking in terms of:
1) if its low power enough to be eye safe, will it still clean a airline chair in 30 seconds ? 2) if it can sterilize at a distance and fast (assuming LEDs can), wont it be powerful enough to be dangerous to health ?
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
I agree that handheld personal UVC sterilizers are silly. Like selling snake oil. Looks like it takes 20 mJ/cm^2 to get 90% reduction of some kinds of virus. Safety rules (see TLV) limit human exposure to 3 mJ/cm^2 cumulative in any 1000 seconds (?). I think the first consequence of overdoing it would be temporary conjunctivitis in sensitive people.
A personal sterilizer, like for an armrest you are about to touch, might work if it were very intense, and well shrouded and/or required operator to wear protective glasses. How about paper test strips that change color when exposed to enough UVC to sterilize things?
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
klugesmith wrote ...
I agree that handheld personal UVC sterilizers are silly. Like selling snake oil... ... How about paper test strips that change color when exposed to enough UVC to sterilize things?
yes, this is the conclusion I came to as well, it doesn't look like these companies have put a lot of thought into reality.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Just heard of an emerging technology that might get a boost from Covid abatement.
Couple of companies are making excimer lamps that are efficient radiators of UV light at 222 nm. They claim that that wavelength is good for killing bacteria and viruses, but much safer than 254 nm for people. Its depth of penetration is so shallow that it doesn't reach live cells in skin or eyes. (As wavelengths go down and photon energies go up, they interact more strongly with matter & are stopped sooner. That trend eventually reverses, somewhere between deep UV and soft x-rays.)
Those companies have dreams of occupied rooms being continuously irradiated with 222 nm to reduce the spread of pathogens.
Looks like it won't be easy for you or me to buy a 222 nm lamp to play with.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Came to work for the first time in a week, to attend to some lab things. Had to leave the room while new mobile surface-disinfecting robot made its rounds.
Then remembered we can't easily post pictures here. The one I saw (safely, from the other side of a plain glass window) is a lot like the ones on this maker's page: As far as I can tell, the lamps are 254-nm germicidal tubes in about T8 x 36 inch size, driven very hard.
The operator monitored coverage using some special yellow paper post-it notes, that change color when irradiated enough to kill germs. I want to get one & see how it reacts to an old UV-EPROM eraser light.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.