If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #61373
Joined: Sat Dec 17 2016, 01:45PM
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 87
I know this sounds silly, but if you hooked up one black lead from one meter to a red lead of another meter, using 5 multimeters set to the AC voltage setting, can I find a way to measure the output of a high powered 2-3Kv AC source (MOT setup) without overvolting my meters?
Is it possible to also measure the current output with the MOT output connected to the string of meters?
Since the voltage setting uses high impedance, and each meter is rated to read 600v, would the voltage be divided among the 5 meters evenly and the impedance of the 5 meters add up?
Registered Member #61428
Joined: Sat Jan 14 2017, 12:39PM
Location:
Posts: 50
Proud Mary wrote ...
Mr Scott, making a very simple circuit called a voltage divider would enable you to measure voltages higher than the 600V setting on your multimeter.
If you have a selection of large value resistors on hand this is going to probably be your best option. Just ensure you select the resistors such that you wont exceed their power rating.
Suppose you make your divider out of 10 equal 1/4 watt carbon film resistors and you're trying to measure ~4kV then the minimum resistance of your 2.5W divider can be found as V^2/P.
R=4000V^2/(10*0.25W)=6.4Meg
When the voltage to be measured is applied across all 10 resistors in series, 10% of the voltage will appear across each of the resistors. Although 680k (X10) is the nearest standard value, it would likely be best to just use ten 1M (Brown/Black/Green/Gold) resistors. That way you'll have some head room.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Enceladus wrote ... [making a voltage divider] ... best option. Just ensure you select the resistors such that you wont exceed their power rating.
Enceladus: Good work teaching! Now time to learn some things. As Radiotech said, resistors come with voltage ratings that shouldn't be exceeded. For non-special ¼ watt carbon film R's, it's usually 250 V or 300 V. To complement Radiotech's reference, here's part of a datasheet about MF-series resistors from KOA Speer. Look at the next-to-last column: At the high-ohms end of a resistor product series, the voltage rating often gets you first. When specifying 1-megohm 1/4-watt-size resistors, you have to pay attention to voltage ratings if the power dissipation will exceed 1/16 watt!
Suppose you make your divider out of 10 equal 1/4 watt carbon film resistors and you're trying to measure ~4kV then the minimum resistance of your 2.5W divider can be found as V^2/P. R=4000V^2/(10*0.25W)=6.4Meg When the voltage to be measured is applied across all 10 resistors in series, 10% of the voltage will appear across each of the resistors. ... just use ten 1M resistors. That way you'll have some head room.
At 1 megohm you have a more sensible margin on the power rating, but the voltages are still too high unless you choose special resistors. I do recognize that this is a hobby forum, where it's popular to compare notes about abusing electronic components.
Scotty: You only asked about measuring 2.5 to 3 kV, e.g. using five multimeters each on 600 VAC range. ( Which would work, by the way, if the meters are approximately identical, and if you add the five voltage readings together. As a practical matter, with cheap DMM's, it could be risky for the instruments and the operator. )
So you'll probably be OK using a voltage divider with only ten garden variety resistors. Here's an exercise for you: compute the change in the attenuation factor, due to connecting your voltmeter in parallel with the bottom resistor of voltage divider. If you want accurate 10:1 scaling, for convenience, the bottom resistor can be made a bit larger than the others. If you haven't learned enough to do this with confidence, please leave all MOT's safely bolted inside MO's.
Registered Member #61428
Joined: Sat Jan 14 2017, 12:39PM
Location:
Posts: 50
klugesmith,
Granted I have never tried this exact application with 1/4W resistors, but I have seen them used in high voltage applications such as connected across 1n4007 diode strings to ensure balanced voltage drops across each diode while they are blocking, as well as in small Marx generators and bleeders for TC primary cap banks. You can coddle your resistors if you like but I have never had any problems with 1/4W resistors at up to 1kV as long as I haven't exceed the power rating. Besides, they're like 5 cents. Who cares?
Also, I am well aware of how component tolerances work, but I was just trying to outline how to do it fast and dirty without it pouring smoke the second it's powered on. With 10X 1M there should be ample time to get a reading before it overheats.
It's a contradiction to label a 1M resistor as being rated for 1/4W and 250V. Ohm's law is pretty inflexible that way. It's got to be one or the other. It makes no sense to explicitly display one rating while secretly limiting the true rating to less than half of what it's supposed to be. If a 1M 1/4W resistor is not rated to dissipate any more than 1/16W, then it's not actually a 1/4W resistor at all, is it?
I honestly didn't even know there was such thing as carbon film resistor datasheets. They have no numbers or letters or insignia except the bands. How do you reference that?
I was thinking that a capacitive divider might also work too if power dissipation is that big of an issue (although I remain skeptical that it would be.) High voltage caps are usually a common item in high voltage hobbyist junk drawers. At 60Hz it's not at all difficult to get all the reactance you'd need to limit the current to a reasonable level with just 2 caps. Maybe something like a 200pF and a 1.8nF with the output taken across the 1.8nF. (Just a rough guesstimate)
Connecting several meters in series just seems ridiculous to me but it looks like thats what he wants to do. Good luck with that Scott. Hopefully you don't end up with a pile of dead meters. If you change your mind about building a divider Scott, you can PM me if you need help.
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
@Enceladus The resistors might be able to handle the voltage but if they do arc over it isn't the cost of the replacemt resistor I would be worrying about, it's the (major) damage it would do to your measuring equipment
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
Enceladus wrote ...
It's a contradiction to label a 1M resistor as being rated for 1/4W and 250V. Ohm's law is pretty inflexible that way. It's got to be one or the other.
Not so fast, Lard Boy! The voltage rating of a resistor will take into account the possibility of flashover and tracking, while manufacturer's spec sheets will also show the resistor's tolerance of momentary overloads in which, for example only, high voltage short duration pulses could damage the resistor without ever exceeding the limits set by the part's rate of thermal dissipation. Such damage is not always visible, and may take the form of a permanent change in the resistor's characteristics.
Registered Member #2099
Joined: Wed Apr 29 2009, 12:22AM
Location: Los Altos, California
Posts: 1716
Enceladus wrote ... It's a contradiction to label a 1M resistor as being rated for 1/4W and 250V. Ohm's law is pretty inflexible that way. It's got to be one or the other.
Only if you think those ratings mean it _can_ dissipate any power <= 1/4 watt, and _can_ handle any voltage <= 250 V. But they don't! The first number means you won't overheat the part if you stay below 1/4 watt. The second means you won't overvolt the part if you stay below 250 volts. If you had a 4 ohm resistor with the same specs, you would hit the power limit at 1 volt.
For practical reasons, specs like that apply to all ohm values in a resistor "product". The top row in that table I cited covers hundreds of ohm values. All nominal 1/4-watt axial-lead metal film resistors. (but not the only 1/4-watt axial-lead metal-film resistors in that maker's catalog.) The part numbers covered by that row share mechanical, tempco, reliability, and voltage specs, and of course a nominal power value. Not to digress too much, but nominal power is just a starting point for thermal considerations. It indicates which curves to look at in charts of temperature rise vs. power, for different cooling scenarios, and what internal temperature the resistors can tolerate.
Enceladus wrote ... I honestly didn't even know there was such thing as carbon film resistor datasheets. They have no numbers or letters or insignia except the bands. How do you reference that?
If you buy them by the reel, at 0.9 cents each, the reel will be labeled with the full manufacturer's part number. Likewise if you buy a handful from Mouser or Digi-key (et al), which will come in their own labeled plastic baggie.
Look at tank capacitor discussions in Tesla Coils subforum. People talk about mfr's and part numbers, not just C and V and dielectric materials. Other 4hv-ers talk about stressing components well beyond voltage ratings. How many of their creations run 24/7/365, with the maker not present to fix them when they break? Or in the case of TC's, when they stop breaking?
It's not uncommon for an industrial components distributor to have a half-million line items under Resistor. At Mouser.com I just narrowed it down to the series we're talking about - see image. See what happens if you check "carbon film" instead of "metal film". To carry this a bit further, suppose there's a 10k 0402-size resistor somewhere in a cable modem. The bill of materials for that board won't just have it down by ohms, tolerance, size, and quantity. It'll have a modem company's part number for Resistor, 10k, 1%, 0402. Factory material planning computers have links from that p/n to one or more mfr part numbers from approved vendors.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.