If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3114
Joined: Sat Aug 14 2010, 08:33AM
Location:
Posts: 608
So I bought the Rigol DS1054z and this hv probe just in case
Probe specs:
* 100:1 attenuation * Input resistance of 100 megohms * Input capacitance of 6 pF * Compensation range : 10 pF - 35 pF * Bandwidth: 100 MHz * Rise Time: 3.5ns * Maximum operating voltage : 1000V DC + ACPP * Cable length : 1.1 m
The Scope came with 10x1 and 1x1 modes on the probes via switch. The packaging says 300v av at 10x so what woud the DC be if i were to use them for DC?
Things I want to measure
* Output of my ZVS driver (no flyback of course) * SSTC bridge output and gate driver waveform
Is is safe to hook up to the output of a SSTC bridge? Do I need a different probe?
I am unsure of what is ok to scope at this point and would greatly appreciate some advice on material to read up on.
Registered Member #2906
Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
Oscilloscope voltages should be obtained by the maximum voltage at the x1-mode. Means: The maximum voltage settings you have is 5V/div, and 4..5 divisions to every side, then you should not apply much more than 30V. The 300Vrms is surely not what you want. DaveJones (eevblog) analysed the input stage of that oscilloscope and its all 45V transistors or whatever. So excessive voltage is clamped behind some series resistance which will burn sooner or later. It also means that you can apply 300Vrms and not get shocked by touching the knobs.. CAT-I. Thats the safety in case of >failure< like probing the mains by accident. With that 30V beeing said you can use a x10-Probe to x10 the Voltage and a x100 probe to x100 times the voltage. (thats neglecting the probes capability) Just be carefull: the probe can withstand less voltage the higher the frequency becomes. So there is a difference between DC-High-Voltage and AC-High-Voltage.
Registered Member #3114
Joined: Sat Aug 14 2010, 08:33AM
Location:
Posts: 608
Thanks DerAlbi Im still a little confused though.
The pic I attached is the interrupter im using for my SSTC (testing ) Its two 555 ics and the output of first is going into pin 2 on the second chip. This gives me varying pulse lengths at different currents to make the arc thicker or thinner.
I was wondering, the voltage per/division is set at 50v I think ( the lower left comer of the scope). With that being said the signal looks to be in the order of 100v ! I doubt the timers are generating such voltages while operating from a 12v battery. What am I reading wrong here ?
Lastly, If i want to measure anything over ~30v I need to use the 10x peobe and anything above that the 100x probe... correct?
I heard scoping the bridge of a sstc will short one of the legs of the mosfets to ground and it will go boom, anyway around this ?
Blue: Output from the first timer square wave Yellow Output of the second timer *varying
Registered Member #2906
Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
The oscilloscope will show you whatever you want it to show you. If you change the division switch on your probes or even connect a whole different probe for the 1:100 then you also need to adjust the oscilloscope to the division factor. (its not auto detecting in this price range ) In the probe menu (press the channel-button once) you will see that you can configure the division ratio. This has nothing to do with hardware at all. Its pure aesthetics.
Let me put it this way: Probe a real 5V signal. Do it with a x1 probe and set you oscilloscope to x10, it assumes the input voltage was divided by 10, so it will display 50V to you instead of the 5V.
I think the same is happening here: you have your oscilloscope configured to x10 and fliped the switch on your probe to x1. Thus reading ten times the votlage. I mean.. issnt it weird that you get 120V where 12V was suposed to be?
You actually want to use the x10-Mode as often as possible. The x1 mode is only made for really small signals. Keep in mind that in the x1-Mode the probe has extremely limited bandwidth (like 7 to 20MHz at most.) The right way do get the full bandwidth is to use a x10 or x100 probe. So dont bother with the x1 mode at all..
And dont forget to compensate your probes. While the original probes have the trimmer at the tip, you HV-Probe should have the trimmer at the base (for safety reasons). If its not compensated correctly your voltages will be way off for everything higher than 5kHz.
Registered Member #1403
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
ZakWolf wrote ...
I heard scoping the bridge of a sstc will short one of the legs of the mosfets to ground and it will go boom, anyway around this ?
It is called a differential probe, and it will also substitute your 1:100 probe, try to find a good priced Tektronix P5200/P5205 on ebay, it goes up to 1300V.
Registered Member #3114
Joined: Sat Aug 14 2010, 08:33AM
Location:
Posts: 608
Mads Barnkob wrote ...
ZakWolf wrote ...
I heard scoping the bridge of a sstc will short one of the legs of the mosfets to ground and it will go boom, anyway around this ?
It is called a differential probe, and it will also substitute your 1:100 probe, try to find a good priced Tektronix P5200/P5205 on ebay, it goes up to 1300V.
That 100:1 probe I bought was only 25$ so could I save myself a couple hundred dollars and buy another one and just mess with the settings and invert the other and let them float?
Running from 170v DC what kind of switching spikes am I looking at ? I dont have a variac but I do have a lower voltage AC transformer. If it will possible to run it that way.
Really since the coil is self tuning I dont really need to look at the output of the bridge. What I need to check is the gate driver and signal coming from my CT.
Registered Member #2906
Joined: Sun Jun 06 2010, 02:20AM
Location: Dresden, Germany
Posts: 727
if you are ok with just probin one signal at a time you can just cut the ground connection of your oscilloscope. (thats the bad version) i personally run my one from a isolation transformer but that has its drawbacks.
Registered Member #3114
Joined: Sat Aug 14 2010, 08:33AM
Location:
Posts: 608
DerAlbi wrote ...
if you are ok with just probin one signal at a time you can just cut the ground connection of your oscilloscope. (thats the bad version) i personally run my one from a isolation transformer but that has its drawbacks.
One signal at a time ?? Hows that if im running two separate probes? Dont get me wrong I know little to nothing about scopes just what I have read in the last day or so but floating two separate probes each going to their own channels seems like it work fine. I also read on a review of those probes that have been used to test 1300v supplies and they worked fine.
Registered Member #1403
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
ZakWolf wrote ...
DerAlbi wrote ...
if you are ok with just probin one signal at a time you can just cut the ground connection of your oscilloscope. (thats the bad version) i personally run my one from a isolation transformer but that has its drawbacks.
One signal at a time ?? Hows that if im running two separate probes? Dont get me wrong I know little to nothing about scopes just what I have read in the last day or so but floating two separate probes each going to their own channels seems like it work fine. I also read on a review of those probes that have been used to test 1300v supplies and they worked fine.
Registered Member #3114
Joined: Sat Aug 14 2010, 08:33AM
Location:
Posts: 608
Mads Barnkob wrote ...
ZakWolf wrote ...
DerAlbi wrote ...
if you are ok with just probin one signal at a time you can just cut the ground connection of your oscilloscope. (thats the bad version) i personally run my one from a isolation transformer but that has its drawbacks.
One signal at a time ?? Hows that if im running two separate probes? Dont get me wrong I know little to nothing about scopes just what I have read in the last day or so but floating two separate probes each going to their own channels seems like it work fine. I also read on a review of those probes that have been used to test 1300v supplies and they worked fine.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.