Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 68
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Ultra7 (54)
uitvinderalex (36)


Next birthdays
09/30 Terrorhertz (15)
10/01 Avalanche (41)
10/02 Carl A. Willis (44)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

14Vf LED question

 1 2 3 4
Move Thread LAN_403
Uspring
Fri Sept 25 2015, 11:05AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
@Bored Chemist:
I guess we're argueing about the definition of the term "threshold". I believe it to be vague enough to be wasting our time to come up with something we agree upon.

@Ash:
Udo, my point was that as the 'average energy' approaches the threshold voltage, more 'jiggling' electrons will gain enough energy to jump. I was suggesting this as an explanation (or partial explanation) of why PicoAmp readings can be obtained at voltages below the 'threshold voltage'.
Ok, I misunderstood your point. Thermal effects definitely play a role wrt to the current. They don't help very much wrt the voltage, that is needed to push electrons to an excited state that is necessary for light emission.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri Sept 25 2015, 11:56AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Uspring wrote ...


Ok, I misunderstood your point. Thermal effects definitely play a role wrt to the current. They don't help very much wrt the voltage, that is needed to push electrons to an excited state that is necessary for light emission.


Maybe I've not explained it very well, Udo.

I agree that thermal effects themselves won't excite many electrons sufficiently for them to jump, but any potential difference accross the junction is going to raise the average energy levels of the electrons waiting to 'jump'.

As the voltage approaches the 'threshold voltage', a greater percentage of the 'jiggling electrons' will attain sufficient energy.

One point I'd like to make is that, even when the 'average electron energy' reaches the threshold, some of the electrons will still have less energy than that required to 'jump'. As the voltage rises still further, more and more electrons will be above the 'threshold energy', resulting in more current flow at higher voltages.

Newtonian physics only looks at 'the average energy' of the electrons, so doesn't explain why some electrons can 'jump' before the average energy reaches the threshold (as observed in the experiments above). In order to explain what's actually happening, you need to start thinking more along the lines of QM, in my opinion.

The 'average' way of looking at it is still useful when using components to design circuits, as long as you take into account 'leakage currents', etc., which aren't really explained by using Newtonian Physics alone.
Back to top
krenshala
Fri Sept 25 2015, 01:49PM
krenshala Registered Member #143 Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 04:25PM
Location: Austin TX, NorAm, Sol III
Posts: 28
Conundrum wrote ...

Its worth mentioning that blue LEDs can fail short, I now put resistors across mine in high reliability applications to mitigate against ESD.
Works for laser diodes too, a good value to start with is 4.7K or 4K7 which only uses <1mA at a typical Vf of the diode with a current limiting resistor or other current control mechanism feeding that.
Also just because it seems to work with two in parallel doesen't mean that it will not burn up with a fresh battery (learned that the hard way, use a resistor!!)

Most of the sellers use 47 or 100 ohms which with your setup and a plausible 1.7V drop from 9.8V in at 2.7V Vdiode would give an individual LED current of 54mA which is high but acceptable.
there will be some diode heating which could be significant as thermal runaway can damage them.
Since the LEDs are listed as 14Vf (not 1.4) on the packaging, would that mean it needs a larger or smaller resistor to accomplish the same task?

Conundrum wrote ...

I've seen some circuits that use a 555 timer and MOSFET (cough road lamp /cough) to pulse the LED and reduce current drain, in fact used a variant of this on my christmas tree lights to get a tiny fraction of the normal current used for only maybe 20% drop in visibility.
Others have used a flickering candle diode between D and G of an N channel MOSFET and a variable resistor from G to S to tune for maximum flickerness (tm)
While tempting just for the additional experience it would provide me, i think that is more than I want to put into this particular project. cheesey
Back to top
Conundrum
Fri Sept 25 2015, 04:21PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4061
1.4V Vf is a typo. I have never seen a blue LED run much below 2.2V and in fact they typically need a lot more.

Unless they actually mean 4.1V which is possible, they might be older technology such as silicon carbide (SiC)
Back to top
krenshala
Tue Sept 29 2015, 10:52PM
krenshala Registered Member #143 Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 04:25PM
Location: Austin TX, NorAm, Sol III
Posts: 28
They are fourteen (14) volt LEDs.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Wed Sept 30 2015, 06:25AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
krenshala wrote ...

They are fourteen (14) volt LEDs.

Would you post the data sheet pdf, or a link to it, please. Any more discussion on this device is superfluous without it.
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Wed Sept 30 2015, 12:33PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
A LED that actually drops 14 v while working properly would be very strange indeed. The same is true of an LED that drops just 1.4 volts and produces much light.
But (as was pointed out earlier) you can get packages with an LED and a resistor in them- the case illustrated was a 12 Volt Led.
Now 14 volts is an odd choice to cater for but, if that's correct and it's a combination of an LED and a resistor that works nicely at 14 volts then I'd expect it to work (albeit less brightly) at 9 volts.

Another possibility is that this "14 volt" LED is a cluster of, for example, seven LEDs in series, each rated for about 2V

Has anyone got any reason to rule those ideas out?
Back to top
 1 2 3 4

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.