If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #599
Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Todays experiments:
several shots at 800VDC 5.6kJ
First shot: - 10.6µH coil, 192g disk - Measured velocity over 800mm travel 60m/s - Kinetic energy 346J, efficiency 6.2%
Second shot: - 10.6µH coil, 192g disk, 85g additional non metallic load on the disk - Measured velocity over 800mm travel 60m/s - Kinetic energy 497J, efficinecy 8.9%
I also did couple shots with 40µH coil but performance was much worse. I think next coil i will try will be around 8µH and made from super heavy wire. Current coil is made from two parallel 2½mm^2 copper wires and it gets rather warm after couple shots.
Right now 60m/s seems to be difficult to beat, but funny thing is that i can add quit a lot of weight in the aluminum disk and it still flies 60m/s
Registered Member #599
Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
hen918 wrote ...
what do you use to dump the back EMF? some big-ass diodes?
Nothing. :)
(well, not true. I dont disconnect my charger and it has 50R series resistance on DC side so any negative voltage will be bled away by the rectifier bridge)
I did some more testing today and find out interesting thing: My chinese scale was reading wrong from the beginning. The 125g disk was actually 192g and so on I have updated earlier posts with correct numbers
Right now 60m/s seems to be difficult to beat, but funny thing is that i can add quit a lot of weight in the aluminum disk and it still flies 60m/s
Possibly the disk takes off long before the field has reached max. More mass implies slower takeoff and a perhaps a higher field before the disk leaves the range of the field. That would also explain the lower performance for your larger inductance coils, since there the field builds up even slower. But the lower performance might also be due to the larger resistance.
Registered Member #162
Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
from the few small experiments that I have done and noting performance of various EM launchers it seems to me that increasing mass usually increases efficiency with two problems; great lumps of metal with lots of momentum as well as energy unimpressive projectile speed.
I can speculate, but I don't actually KNOW why this is, one of those laws of nature things ?
Registered Member #11591
Joined: Wed Mar 20 2013, 08:20PM
Location: UK
Posts: 556
Kizmo wrote ...
I am planning to build about 10µH coil that is wound with copper flat bar or perhaps flattened water pipe.
I can recommend flattened water-pipe. I used micro-bore pipe, wound in a spiral, for my can crusher / launcher. It worked well un-enclosed, but I noticed it was getting more bent and out of line every shot, so I 3D printed a surround for it and epoxied it in. Since then it's been on the back-burner and I haven't gotten around to removing the thick layer of plastic covering the coil.
Registered Member #599
Joined: Thu Mar 22 2007, 07:40PM
Location: Northern Finland, Rovaniemi
Posts: 624
Sulaiman wrote ...
great lumps of metal with lots of momentum as well as energy unimpressive projectile speed, more like artillery than small arms.
It is still very impressive bang.. kind of scary
I managed to hit c-clamp that was holding my projectile stopper together. Disk was stopped but the clamp got launched and it smashed ccfl tube from ceiling light fixture
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Sulaiman wrote ...
.it seems to me that increasing mass usually increases efficiency . I can speculate, but I don't actually KNOW why this is, one of those laws of nature things ?
As Udo pointed out, if it's heavier, it will stay in the field being accelerated for longer.
I assume that while it is in the 'field' it is adding to the inductance, The more mass, the greater the inductance, and the longer the pulse lasts, also, a light disc will leave the field (and stop being accelerated) quicker, so won't be accelerated for as long as a heavier disc.
Maybe the 'law of nature' is to do with a heavier disc being accelerated for longer, so extra mass just means it's accelerated for longer, therefore mass has no bearing on velocity?
Obviously this would only hold true up to a certain point, the point I'm making is that as mass increases, efficiency increases, up to a point.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.