Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 92
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

self excited homopolar generator (no PMM!!!)

first  4 5 6 7 
Move Thread LAN_403
Salvador
Tue Apr 07 2015, 06:48PM
Salvador Registered Member #54402 Joined: Mon Feb 02 2015, 11:09PM
Location:
Posts: 86
Right the charge is being pushed sideways so to speak not directly in the very direction the magnet travels.

So when I now visualize this in my drum type homopolar generator , well i have the exciter coil wound on the stator and the load coils on the stator , the stator itself imagine to be sort of similar to that of an AC induction motor, only difference would be the way the coils on it are wound .and there is a drum rotor ,the way I imagine the rotor is copper foil or flat litz wire wound in a toroid like manner forming a loop , well imagine a toroid transformer for better understanding and now kinda make it longer sort of strecth it out and put it centered on a rotor piece.

the question im trying to solve in my head is would this follow chain of events take place the way I imagine it to be ,

The Rotor spins up and rotates , I apply a current kick to the exciter coil which has a capacitor in series with it , the current in that coil form a small magnetic field the rotor spins through that field (AC fiel) there is now current induced in the rotor windingthis now forms a larger field and this larger field from the rotor now charges the capacitor in the exciter field coil and also induces AC current in the other load coils on the same stator , but since the way the coils are oriented towards one another , I am hoping to not only get the induction of current due to the changing field itself (transformer effect) but also the additional boost of current due to lorentz force on the charges , so im hoping to in each cycle get the induced current +the boost of lorentz current which is basically the same current just amplified due to the lorentz forces from the onpassing field of the rotor , these two currents being in phase ine each cycle.

Hard to explain I hope you understood the idea this is also the answer to your question about the motivation behind these questions , just an idea that's all.
Back to top
Uspring
Wed Apr 08 2015, 10:11AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
A bit confusing. Can you make a drawing?

Back to top
Salvador
Wed Apr 08 2015, 09:45PM
Salvador Registered Member #54402 Joined: Mon Feb 02 2015, 11:09PM
Location:
Posts: 86
Well I'm not good at drawing actually im bad at that.

I will make a drawing soon with one of my friends helping me out but meanwhile I want to show you something very interesting I found searching on google.Although a bit different it pretty much seems to be the same thing im talking about here , can I ask you guys a favor , I will attach the PDF file can you please take a look and tell me what you think.

As much as I understand they have a flat field coil close to the center axis which is fed with DC current so makes a DC field then there is a faraday disc like rotor with blades , the disc part rotates in the DC field coil and the blades extend the " induced" magnetic field in the rotor to the periphery where the double sided circuit board windings are.I assume tis machine must induce current in those outer windings by means of induction as in classical generators and also by means of lorentz force as the layout is like a faraday homopolar generator.

But the interesting part is not that the rotor which has non uniform structure can induce current into further windings because when it rotates it makes the windings to see a variable field, the interesting part is how does the rotor disc gets its magnetic field , it's said in the paper that it gets it from a field coil which is quote :" fed with DC"

So does this macine work because the spinning rotor is a magnetic continum of the DC field coil and because it has uneven sides the magnetic field seen by the armature windings on the cirucit boards is changing since the blades move past those windings so there is current induced in them , so this is a kind of AC homopolar generator with no brushes and slip rings , correct?
]axialflywheel_ieee-ias_2002.pdf[/file]
Back to top
Andy
Thu Apr 09 2015, 02:44AM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Hi Salvader, look up axialflux wind turbine genny, its the same princple but with a dc electro magnetic instead of Neos, but by the looks it would make a good genny, the field strength would be weaker, as the magnetic path is spreadout, but it is mechincal good so should beable to get high speeds, compared to the axial flux.
If your going to build this pdf, make the steel top and bottom rotor thinkness as large as possable, and large radius, with the airgap were the coils are in the centre, less than 1cm between top and bottom electromags, and it would make a good about 12-24 volt 30amp setup.


Edit
It also remindes me of a car alternator, if the slots didnt match up from top to bottom, you would have n,s,n,s and get double the voltage as the magnticfield ampultude is changing twice as quick, but iI would move the feild coil to the outside to make the magntic path from high,low,exra high,low,high too low,low,extra high,low,low which should increase the maxiunim ammount of amps possabile from the device.
Back to top
Uspring
Thu Apr 09 2015, 08:30AM
Uspring Registered Member #3988 Joined: Thu Jul 07 2011, 03:25PM
Location:
Posts: 711
Looks like a more or less synchronous motor to me. As they say:
The torque is created by interaction between this field and the rotating field produced by the three-phase armature winding.
The geometry is interesting, though.
Back to top
Salvador
Thu Apr 09 2015, 08:37AM
Salvador Registered Member #54402 Joined: Mon Feb 02 2015, 11:09PM
Location:
Posts: 86
Well I will not build exactly this I have something similar yet different in mind.
why you say it's a synchronous motor? doesn't all synchronous motors have a direct electrical path between their stators and rotors , hence the brushes hence called universal motors that can work both on DC and AC?
Back to top
Wolfram
Thu Apr 09 2015, 09:11AM
Wolfram Registered Member #33 Joined: Sat Feb 04 2006, 01:31PM
Location: Norway
Posts: 971
What's the goal of the project? It will probably be easier to visualize the idea if we know what the purpose of it is.

Salvador wrote ...

Well I will not build exactly this I have something similar yet different in mind.
why you say it's a synchronous motor? doesn't all synchronous motors have a direct electrical path between their stators and rotors , hence the brushes hence called universal motors that can work both on DC and AC?

A synchronous motor has a rotor (permanent magnet or iron in the case of reluctance motors) that is locked to the rotating field generated by the incoming AC frequency. A universal motor is not a synchronous motor, but a brush-commutated motor, like toy DC motors, but with an electromagnet for the stator.
Back to top
Salvador
Thu Apr 09 2015, 09:54AM
Salvador Registered Member #54402 Joined: Mon Feb 02 2015, 11:09PM
Location:
Posts: 86
right correct I mixed them up , synchronous and asynchronous are words that refer to the way the field aligns with the rotor,
a universal motor is a synchronous motor, yet not the only case.
Back to top
Salvador
Sat Apr 11 2015, 07:56PM
Salvador Registered Member #54402 Joined: Mon Feb 02 2015, 11:09PM
Location:
Posts: 86
Now I guess my final question for now would be , if you are familiar with the machine described in the PDF i added in a few posts above , there you see a rotor with "blades" having a magnetic field in it excited from a DC field coil , the blades pass by the armature windings creating induction current in them, the authors describe that as an AC homopolar generator due to the geometry of the machine also lorentz drag is induced in the windings as the blades pass,

what I wonder is what would happen and how would it work if I changed these things, make the rotor a two sided dish, no blades just a uniform dish like circle inbetween put a field coil and at the outer sides put the armature windings that part being the same as in the machine described above. Now run AC current through the field coil , the dishes or the rotor rotates and so now it has changing flux through it would the armature windings between the dish get both induced current and also lorentz drag in each cycle as in the original machine where the rotor has uneven geometry or blades?

just in case someone cant see the original PDF here it is one more time

Link2
Back to top
Andy
Sat Apr 11 2015, 08:37PM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
What are you after, volts current or power, the ac will make more volts, as you have motion aswell as magntic field ampultide changes, but the current max will be minial because a inductor stores more and more energy in the feild towards dc, its like motor gears, one is hardened steel the other a liquard, the transfer mechinics is bad, as the power is volts times current, you could spin it upto the speed of light and beable to extract as much power as a electrostatic machine, but you would have gigavolts to use.
Back to top
first  4 5 6 7 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.