If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #4266
Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
I'm trying to build a kontik, its pretty much a submarine that takes a longline fishing line out to a certain distance from shore then stop. I started a thread about control(direction finding, hopefully cheaper than GPS), but the data on the internet is hard to find out, what the HP of the electrical motor needs to be to move the sub through the water. On one website they said 1hp for 10kg of displacement as a rough figure. How did they work that out, is it just drag, inertia etc?
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
In the limit of zero speed, you need zero power.
How fast do you want to go?
You probably need the capability to go at least twice as fast as the strongest current you expect to encounter, so that you always have some control authority.
Then with your minimum target speed settled, you can start to google for drag coefficient, and use that through frontal area and total wetted area to some estimates of power needed.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
For displacement vessels, as opposed to planing vessels, there is a formula for finding the most efficient speed (for surface vessels). The formula is the square root of the waterline length (in feet) is equal to the most efficient speed in Knots. For example, a 50 foot vessel will have an optimum speed of ~7 knots.
Once you try to push the vessel faster, the power required rises dramatically. I don't know if this also applies to subs, but I assume either this principle, or a similar one holds.
There is also an optimum formula for designing the front of the sub, which I forget, but which explains the strange shape of the front end of nuclear subs, and also of some supertankers.
Registered Member #65
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
GPS does not give direction like a magnetic compass, but rather measures distance over time to get the direction of travel.
There are several dozen GPS flight path control systems for RC planes that should work with minimal hardware changes.
Note that depending on the region many rules regarding fishing gear sometimes carry a large fine. ...besides the ethical ramifications it is unwise to copy another innovator's products.
Registered Member #4266
Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Thanks Carbon Rod
Note that depending on the region many rules regarding fishing gear sometimes carry a large fine. ...besides the ethical ramifications it is unwise to copy another innovator's products.
Longline fishing has a max of 25 hooks per length, but I think it might have dropped down to 20. What do you mean by copy another innovators product?, konitiks have been around for 200-300 years, I'm sure the owner or grandchildren would have passed away.
Sorry I'm not making a product, just gaining knowledge in subs, and catch some fish.
Registered Member #65
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:43AM
Location:
Posts: 1155
A small trolling motor would likely cost less than a Diver Propulsion Vehicle prop. Assuming a roughly perpendicular to shoreline path, one may prefer a tethered inverse-gear rudder steering system controlled by simple surface line tension and a tiller eye linkage. One could use the same line to trip a thruster cutoff (similar to a lamp switch) when it is taut enough at a specified line length. Additionally, using two feeder spools on a ceramic bullseye could allow you to cycle the lines several times without returning the float to shore. For example, letting both ends of the line out would increase travel distance, braking both would stop the vessel prop, and reeling in one (baited) while letting out the other (clean) would cycle the line back to shore without tangling. Remember to use a natural cork plug in the hull so if your gear is lost it will sink eventually.
A few low cost units may prove more effective than some relatively costly AUV.
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
1hp for 10kg of displacement would be nice, but you can get away with a lot less. The sculling boat I use is about 27ft long and displaces something like 110kg with me in it. I am good for about 1/2hp and my speed in calm conditions is about 4m/s or a little under 8 knots. Oddly this is well over Ash's rule of thumb for optimum hull speed of a 27ft boat.
A long, thin torpedo shaped submarine would probably have much the same drag characteristics as a long narrow boat. At these low speeds the drag is mainly due to friction between water and hull, so I don't think it matters if it is floating on top of the water or submerged in it.
For the fishing application you suggested, the drag of the line would have to be considered, as well as the force needed to keep station against winds and currents. That may well end up more important than the hull drag.
If the fishing application doesn't work out, you can always sell it to some Mexican smugglers.
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve Conner wrote ...
1hp for 10kg of displacement would be nice, but you can get away with a lot less. The sculling boat I use is about 27ft long and displaces something like 110kg with me in it. I am good for about 1/2hp and my speed in calm conditions is about 4m/s or a little under 8 knots. Oddly this is well over Ash's rule of thumb for optimum hull speed of a 27ft boat.
A long, thin torpedo shaped submarine would probably have much the same drag characteristics as a long narrow boat. At these low speeds the drag is mainly due to friction between water and hull, so I don't think it matters if it is floating on top of the water or submerged in it.
For the fishing application you suggested, the drag of the line would have to be considered, as well as the force needed to keep station against winds and currents. That may well end up more important than the hull drag.
If the fishing application doesn't work out, you can always sell it to some Mexican smugglers.
The calculation I gave is 'very' approximate, but is pretty good for conventionally shaped vessels. There are plenty of other factors, and other methods. Kayaks are always used as an example of non-conformity. A vessel that has very little in the way of wake will exceed the speed calculated using this very basic formula, but the longer the waterline length, the faster the vessel will go. This is why ocean going liners got bigger and bigger, so they could cross the Atlantic faster.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.