If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3859
Joined: Sun May 01 2011, 03:47PM
Location:
Posts: 179
Hazmatt_(The Underdog) wrote ...
tarakan,
IF YOU DO THE RESEARCH... you will find that transmission velocities in coaxial cables is often 0.86 x c
But this varies depending on the medium.
The propagation is also on the surface of the medium, this is the skin effect, which is another headache!
AND if the copper is silver plated, now you're dealing with an extremely conductive medium plated onto a second medium, whereby most of the RF energy, if not all, is inside the 3 mils of silver, and the copper is just acting as a mechanical support.
AND ALL OF THIS... goes right out the window with Tesla coils because they are NOT IDEAL antennas, so antenna theory doesn't really matter at this point.
If you really want to go down the rabbit hole, the secondary has multiple resonances which approaches a ladder network in simulation.
Honestly, just build your coil and be done with it, and stop worrying about minutia. It takes about $20,000 in equipment to measure these small problems, and who has the time, seriously.
Tesla transformer is not wound with coaxial cables. Proportions of height to width are also pure BS according to Tesla's own patents and drawings.
I am winding a long and skinny one 1" in diameter with a 36AWG.
Registered Member #72
Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Tarkan
I feel your pain and frustration, it's evident in each of your posts. You have a heard a lot of things about Tesla coils, and are having difficulty separating the true from the false. One of the joys of TCs is that they behave in such a strange, almost magical way. As they are complex, well, more complex than an antenna or an LC circuit, a lot of people think them magical. I forget who said that any technology with more than half a dozen variables is indistinguishable from magic.
Anyhows, there is a sizable body of people who think that the most efficient way to run a TC secondary is to have the wire length = lambda/4 at the resonant frequency. It has an emotional appeal, and it is possible to build or tune a TC to that relationship. However there is no emperical evidence to suggest that it's true. The fact that the wire on the secondary is close wound, and the nearest electrical things to each turn is the one above and below means you certainly cannot analyse it like an isolated wire.
Why do you want to build a Tesla coil?
If it's for the impress the friends and family stuff, then follow the well tried and well tested route. There are a great many rules of thumb that work quite well, ones like use 1000 turns on the secondary, or make it between 3:1 and 5:1 height:diameter ratio. You can't really go wrong following those. The secondary is the difficult thing, wind that, and then trim everything else to match. Forget Tesla's patents, the man was barking towards the end of his life, a pity really, but that's the way it goes sometimes. Read Hazmatt's posts, and Dr DC, you asked, and they are trying to help.
If it's to investigate electromagnetic theory, then you will need to know what B and H fields are, and a lot more besides. A TC is probably too complicated to attempt to understand all its behaviour from the ground up, but it is a lot of fun.
If it's to delve into the magical theory, then it will rapidly become a waste of time airing it on this forum.
It's a little disappointing to see a man on the one hand asking questions, but on the other dismissing height/wdith ratios as BS. If you have made up your mind it's BS, then you are uneducateable. The reason 4:1 is the ratio to go for is a complex mix of the conductivuty of copper, the typical frequencies TCs run at and so the skin depth, the impedance of free space, the typical coupling coeffieicnts that work well (so 8:1 is too long), the sort of trajectory a spark takes out of the topload towards a ground some distance away (so 2:1 is too squat), and a whole bunch besides. Most importantly, it's an emperical observation made by hundreds of people before you who have made sucessful Tesla coils. Don't follow it by all means, but expect to have to work harder to get a good result.
Registered Member #135
Joined: Sat Feb 11 2006, 12:06AM
Location: Anywhere is fine
Posts: 1735
Spot on Neil.
Tarakan, pick yourself up a copy of "The Ultimate Tesla Coil Design" and let that be your bible.
Mitch Tilbury presents a very thoughtful analysis, But as a researcher and Electrical Engineer myself, I know that his numbers do not make much sense. (In short his input power to output and wire considerations are way off.)
He had in the past downloadable spreadsheets to calculate every aspect. I am not sure if the website is still available, but if it is, it should be at
I have been researching this subject for over 14 years, I have all the books (Inductance calculations, Transient theory, Design of Inductance Coils, etc.), a bunch of equipment, and still no answer yet.
There are over 40 variables to consider, each related to another, including your friend H/D ratio.
H/D ratio determines the pitch of the winding, the TURNS!!!, RESONANT FREQUENCY, RESISTANCE DC AND AC, SKIN EFFECTS, HEATING, coil height like Neil said (you dont want it just arcing to itself) JUST TO NAME A FEW!!!
So no, its not BS.
And you totally missed the point of the transmission velocity, which cannot be measured in a single conductor. There has to be a return path. The point was that transmission IS NOT IN A VACUUM, it is in a conductor, so it can be close to 0.86 x c, so no, you cannot calculate the velocity based on the speed of light, there is a correction factor for the transmission medium.
Registered Member #4266
Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Hi tarakan2 What I was meaning is that the primary is linked to the secondary by magtnic fields and the secondary is linked to the ground plane by static fields. If I was going to build a Telsa coil I would find the secondary antenna length say 1km, then make the primary have 50% frequency of the secondary length, then build a top load to bring the thing into resonance. A static field at 450-500V can in juice 5V at 100meters into a conductive object.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.