Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 32
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
David.Lightman (55)
jonny5 (41)


Next birthdays
04/19 Nicko (57)
04/20 gentoo_daemon (43)
04/21 kilovolt (50)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Evolution vs. Creationism

first  2 3 4 5 
Move Thread LAN_403
Marko
Thu Sept 28 2006, 01:37PM
Marko Registered Member #89 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 02:40PM
Location: Zadar, Croatia
Posts: 3145
Yes, women actually have fewer ribs EVR.

I remembered something cool that happened to me a while back. I was talking to this guy from a metal band, and he told me he was a Satanist.
Hey Steve, don't embrace the dark side.. cheesey

AFAIK, even back while we were little kids, they never taught as (and yes at catechism) to interpret beggining of the bible literally.

Ribs argue looks just silly...
Link2

From little I know nowhere in bible is writen that it writes about true scientific facts adn that earth is 20000y old, and that devil himself created everything ''else'' to fool our faith confused

Anyway, isn't big bang, evolution and stuff anyway a sort of creation? wink

Link2

And seems to be much more scientifically approved than making god some kind of magician who conjures things and a surgeon...

There are several studies that suggest that intellignece does not affect peoples tendency to accept beliefs as truths. There are also studies that suggest that people with higher education are more likely to believe in complete nonsense. In any case it seems to be little difference between people in their ability to be critical.

Woot! This confirms that my inteligence is pretty low as I rarely believe in nonsense... cheesey

Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Sept 28 2006, 02:45PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
The following website has some interesting information on the subject of creationism vs. evolution. I haven't read much of it, so I can't say for sure if it is an unbiased site or slanted toward one argument or the other, however from a quick look it does appear to be biased toward the evolution argument.

http://www.talkorigins.org/

Back to top
Bjørn
Thu Sept 28 2006, 03:17PM
Bjørn Registered Member #27 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 02:20AM
Location: Hyperborea
Posts: 2058
From little I know nowhere in bible is writen that it writes about true scientific facts adn that earth is 20000y old
It does not, one interpretation is that the earth is 20 0000 years old but it depends on a series of assumptions, the same is true for other interpretations. Nowhere in the bible is any age specified directly.

and that devil himself created everything ''else'' to fool our faith
It does say that the devil plays such tricks and when you have the choice between the creator discrediting himself or the devil discrediting him then the choice is quite logical if we assume that the earth is young since we find evidence to the contrary.

Back to top
Part Scavenger
Thu Sept 28 2006, 04:09PM
Part Scavenger Registered Member #79 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 11:35AM
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 673
He's right,as far as I know, we (as Creationists) don't know if the earth is 6,000; 22,000; or millions of years old. That is based on speculation from the time periods when they think certain parts of the Bible were written. That is IIRC. If we are able to prove it, however, that would basically kill Evolution as we know it. I think that's why some people are so adimate about it.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Thu Sept 28 2006, 04:43PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
What do you think of Darwin's finches? Link2
They are a collection of birds that live in the Galapagos Islands, all more or less the same apart for having different sizes and shapes of beaks, each adapted for eating different kinds of food. Over the years scientists have watched the populations of the various beak shapes change, as changes in the climate affect how much of the different kinds of food there is around.

That's an actual demonstration of natural selection at work in the wild. In fact they're called Darwin's finches because it was seeing them that inspired Darwin to come up with the theory of natural selection (and hence evolution) in the first place.

It's not conclusive proof that we're a bunch of bald monkeys who figured out some neat tricks with fire and metal, but it's quite compelling.
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Thu Sept 28 2006, 08:01PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
"You're onto something here Scavenger! Adam and Eve always have belly buttons in those classical paintings. This could be the straw that finally breaks the creationist camp's back "
Or the artists didn't think about it at the time or (an oddity here) Since "man was created in God's image" perhaps it's just that God has a navel.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Thu Sept 28 2006, 08:04PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Bored Chemist wrote ...

"You're onto something here Scavenger! Adam and Eve always have belly buttons in those classical paintings. This could be the straw that finally breaks the creationist camp's back "
Or the artists didn't think about it at the time or (an oddity here) Since "man was created in God's image" perhaps it's just that God has a navel.

Actually i said it, not Scavenger. Who is to say Adam and Eve are humans anyways? Perhaps they represent the first proteins which formed and evolution took over from there.
Back to top
Ben
Thu Sept 28 2006, 08:14PM
Ben Vigilatny
Registered Member #17 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 02:47PM
Location: NL
Posts: 158
Steve Connor wrote ...
Personally, I think what religious folk call "God" and what scientists call "The laws of physics" are both manifestations of the same thing.

The difference is that when the "laws of physics" are wrong, they are "usually" revised. When God is wrong, you are a heretic.

Bored Chemist wrote ...
Or the artists didn't think about it at the time or (an oddity here) Since "man was created in God's image" perhaps it's just that God has a navel.

God has a navel because he was born from Mary....who was descended from Adam and Eve. Thus we have a causal loop, and the universe ceases to exist....good job.
Back to top
EEYORE
Thu Sept 28 2006, 11:51PM
EEYORE Registered Member #99 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 06:10PM
Location: florida, usa
Posts: 637
Perhaps man ought to stop trying to convince each other they are correct, and accept the fact that we likely will not explain the universe. As a christian, I doubt God wants any of us to prove He exists anyways. If I knew He existed rather than believed, I would not really have an opportunity to make a decision. Id know, simple as that with no faith needed at all! Satan knows God is real as well wink
Im am willing to bet God would have us seek Him out via methods used by those in the Bible, rather than use science to attempt to force others to acknowledge Him. Remember, this is just from my christian point of view, assuming God does exist. The Bible wasnt meant to explain things, unlike Hesiod's Theogany and Works and Days, it is meant to show the reader what God is like, how to seek Him him, and how we ought to please Him. Id rather not try to guess what God is up to, as I dont believe am inperfect entity ( me) could ever understand a perfect one (God, if He exists, is likely perfect, no?) The Bible cannot be taken literally(in many circumstances), nor should it be. As for my own explanation?I have theory, but do not wish to discuss such things, as they are simply theory, with many unknown variables.

I never would expect a non-believer to believe based on an explanation...That would be rediculous to think anyone has "the answer" anyways. I feel both sides should relax, and admit that we both believe different things, and cannot prove anything.

Although I side with the Christians, I do not feel either side has enough ammo to prove anything...Perhaps the conflict lays within the fact that Science is based on fact, and thus far, neither side can fully jive with it. The Bible is all about faith, the polar opposite of science, and evolution is based on theory....
One things for sure, we can all enjoy a cold beer together!
Matt
Back to top
Chris Russell
Thu Sept 28 2006, 11:57PM
Chris Russell ... not Russel!
Registered Member #1 Joined: Thu Jan 26 2006, 12:18AM
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1052
mattrg2 wrote ...
One things for sure, we can all enjoy a cold beer together!
Matt

Amen.
Back to top
first  2 3 4 5 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.