Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 96
  • Members: 1
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Electrical and Magnetic Circuits of a Motor

 1 2 3
Move Thread LAN_403
Andy
Tue Feb 04 2014, 05:32AM
Andy Registered Member #4266 Joined: Fri Dec 16 2011, 03:15AM
Location:
Posts: 874
Hi Patrick
Would this be a good way to select the wire size.
1N/1I
2N/2I
3N/3I
4N/4I

N=turns,I=amp
Then select the amps you battery can supply for a duration, then select the wire in the space to match the turns. If 1amp is to much, adjust to say 0.1amp..0.2amp..0.3amp.
You could probable bruteforce the graph made with different starting amps, when the wire size and amps is selected, pick a battery with the required voltage
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Tue Feb 04 2014, 09:43AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Patrick wrote ...

Dr. Slack wrote ...

Heat losses depend on copper *MASS*, not copper area (other things being optimally designed for a motor of given power). This is one of the cases where you get what you pay for, directly in terms of materials. Buy less copper, and your power goes down, or your losses up. Buy a stronger magnet, everything else gets better.

if the length is constant, increasing diameter does increase mass.

My feeling is that it helps everybody, anybody who wants to particpate in the discussion, noobs certainly, and maybe yourself as well, that if you have in mind a quantity that has dimensions of volume, m3, you call it that, rather than area, which is m2, and assume another dimension coming in by magic. Communicating in exactly the units that matter is good practice. How many of us wince at confusion between energy and power, what's a second left out the equation between friends?

I notice that I'm using mass and volume interchangeably, but in my defense I think the density of copper is a more valid assumable in this discussion.

The number of turns does not matter, other things being equal. However, usually things are not equal, which creates apparent differences due to availablity of specific voltages, or wire sizes, or stator slot widths and lengths. Now if the discussion could go along the lines of 'for this motor iron size, this wire diameter gets more copper onto the motor than this size', then we'd probably get somewhere.
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Feb 13 2014, 12:36AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
New motors arrived today!!!

ok Dr Slack, now we'll get to make some real comparisons!

BC-3530 10 turn, 1400 KsubV, 74 grams, 430 watts, 0.051 ohms. (new motor)
BC-2836 7 turn, 1120 KsubV, 70 grams, 336 watts, 0.070 ohms. (my current motor)


dare i hope? 27% less waste heat !?


1392251769 2431 FT160752 Motora

1392251769 2431 FT160752 Motorb

1392251769 2431 FT160752 Motorc


1392254134 2431 FT1630 Motord

1392254134 2431 FT1630 Motore
Back to top
Sulaiman
Thu Feb 13 2014, 10:31AM
Sulaiman Registered Member #162 Joined: Mon Feb 13 2006, 10:25AM
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3140
The number of turns problem has an optimum when looked at purely as a motor as discussed above,

when battery, wiring and electronics are included,
there becomes a point when few turns/high current
causes significant loss in the circuit external to the motor.
so the 'optimum' motor or motor/gearbox setup will not be the most efficient system.

if moving to lower voltage supply then delta should be easier than wye for high speed.

I can't imagine how many iterations are required for optimising
rotor, gearbox, motor, controller and battery .... a lot !
Back to top
Patrick
Thu Feb 13 2014, 10:03PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
yes sulaiman, im going to try to resolve some of the complexity through iteritve testing in a test stand, to reduce time and cost.
Back to top
 1 2 3

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.