Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 65
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Calculating a tesla coil's resonant frequency?

Move Thread LAN_403
Dr. Dark Current
Tue Nov 12 2013, 12:31PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
I would say so, killing a 6 kilowatt bridge is no fun, and the antenna driver sometimes produces random/undefined states during ground arcs.
Back to top
StormInABottle
Tue Nov 12 2013, 12:42PM
StormInABottle Registered Member #9252 Joined: Fri Jan 04 2013, 06:27AM
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 253
I see.
Can you guys throw me a PLL control schematic that would be better suited for this?
And yes. Killing a bridge is not fun. Specially that those mosfets will dine on my money. That's why i will do low power testing using IRFP 460s. When i reach a stable condition i will switch onto the higher power mosfets.
(Removing a turn from the primary coil will make the coil more power hungry right?)
Back to top
TwirlyWhirly555
Tue Nov 12 2013, 03:44PM
TwirlyWhirly555 Registered Member #4104 Joined: Fri Sept 23 2011, 06:54PM
Location: Uk .
Posts: 122
yes , in a SSTC varying the number of primary turns will vary the current drawn

More turns = more inductance = less current draw ,
Less turns = less inductance = more current draw .

You should start off at a higher number of turns and reduce them as you go and stop at what you feel is safe for the inverter to output / switch
Back to top
twist2b
Tue Nov 12 2013, 04:54PM
twist2b Registered Member #2086 Joined: Tue Apr 21 2009, 02:33AM
Location:
Posts: 117
StormInABottle wrote ...

I see.
I will make sure to put the primary right at the very bottom of the coil.
I plan my primary to be 6 AWG wire. Will be a pain to wind that's for sure.

Diameter of secondary coil : 12.00in
Winding height of secondary coil : 12.00in
Wire diameter for secondary coil : 0.01in
Spacing between windings : 0.00in
Secondary turns : 1200.00
Secondary wire length : 3769.91ft
Secondary inductance : 297.93mH
Approximate resonant frequency : 81.61kHz
Secondary quarter wavelength resonant frequency : 65.27kHz
Secondary self capacitance : 12.77pF
Toroid capacitance required to form quarter wavelength coil : 7.19pF

Tesla coil CAD told me all that.
The topload should get the resonant frequency down to 50-60 khz.
I will also mount the driver / control circuit on a pcb to minimize stray inductance and stray capacitance.

The coil is based on this
Link2

The control circuit has slight modifications. Like higher filtering capacitance and other diodes.
The full bridge sports shiny mosfets
Link2

Higher power diodes
C8/C9 are a string of 8 capacitors each
3000 UF filtering.
100 Amp , 1000 volt rectifier.
High wattage resistors.

All seems good :o?


HAHA! You would have a skin effect depth of 228.2162 um (micro-meters) (81.61kHz - just for safety of measurement I used the secondaries Fr to make decisions)
So with

AWG:AC Resistance
6:6.91433 Ohms
18:32.23073 Ohms
26:151.58234 Ohms
20:43.86964 Ohms
28:239.27048 Ohms
29:300.83076 Ohms
30:378.01742 Ohms
32:601.99992 Ohms
34:959.63591 Ohms

I take my original answer back... because you want to run CW so long I would actually suggest staying above 29AWG because you could avoid heat issues so drastically the farther you go up in AWG.. Also with a topload you are looking at even LESS resistance because the Fr goes down.

So if you calculate your output to your secondary you can choose the lowest possible AWG for your application.

I still think it doesn't have to be so drastically wide of a diameter but it might help with winding the guy...
Back to top
StormInABottle
Tue Nov 12 2013, 05:28PM
StormInABottle Registered Member #9252 Joined: Fri Jan 04 2013, 06:27AM
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 253
I 've had experiences with 30 awg before. It's really sloppy but still manageable. Let alone 34 awg.. I'm not sure I will be able to find that.. LET ALONE WINDING IT
I MIGHT find it. But will the difference in efficiency be more than 50-100 watts?
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Tue Nov 12 2013, 10:16PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
StormInABottle wrote ...

I 've had experiences with 30 awg before. It's really sloppy but still manageable. Let alone 34 awg.. I'm not sure I will be able to find that.. LET ALONE WINDING IT
I MIGHT find it. But will the difference in efficiency be more than 50-100 watts?

30 AWG is very easy to wind. Its very manageable. 34 AWG much more difficult because the wire is much more fragile.

50-100 watts? Where is that number coming from?

Are you saying a secondary would dissipate that much heat as loss?? My 34 AWG secondaries are cool to the touch, even after long duration runs. Not sure where you are getting these loss numbers. That's a LOT of heat!
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Tue Nov 12 2013, 10:38PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
EVR: We are talking about CW coils here. With such, it is almost an impossible task to keep the secondary from melting during longer runs, without forced air cooling. 100 watt loss for a moderately sized coil seems reasonable, maybe more.
Back to top
twist2b
Wed Nov 13 2013, 01:36AM
twist2b Registered Member #2086 Joined: Tue Apr 21 2009, 02:33AM
Location:
Posts: 117
Right, there is no break like pulsed Tesla Coils.... since we are working in khz 60,000 times a second makes a big difference than 100,000 times. 6 AWG should have a good thermal covering too, so that should be helpful....... The more we talk about this kind of TC the more I am getting excited.
StormInABottle - can you post pictures of the results? :D
Back to top
StormInABottle
Wed Nov 13 2013, 05:43AM
StormInABottle Registered Member #9252 Joined: Fri Jan 04 2013, 06:27AM
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 253
Sure. I will try
Dr.dark current
I want to decrease the heat / eddy current as much as possible
Also I've got exams so the project will get slightly delayed
Sorry if my grammar is bad. Writing on a mobile phone atm
Back to top
StormInABottle
Wed Nov 13 2013, 10:29AM
StormInABottle Registered Member #9252 Joined: Fri Jan 04 2013, 06:27AM
Location: Andromeda
Posts: 253
Sure. I will try
Dr.dark current
I want to decrease the heat / eddy current as much as possible
Also I've got exams so the project will get slightly delayed
Sorry if my grammar is bad. Writing on a mobile phone atm
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.