Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 56
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
One birthday today, congrats!
Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)


Next birthdays
06/17 Th3_uN1Qu3 (33)
06/19 sio2 (50)
06/20 Sparrow338 (35)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Projects
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Global Radiation monitoring system

Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Tue Jan 21 2014, 06:57PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4059
I can test one here, have a few sources to try it with and several working counters thanks to Stella.
Can hook it up to a colleagues broadband, they leave the router on all the time so this should be OK.
Back to top
radhoo
Wed Jan 22 2014, 07:01PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 700
Mads Barnkob wrote ...

Unit #11000003 is now live at: Link2 and Link2

I will post pictures of the installation in the upcoming weekend.
Looks great, Mads, and looking forward to your pictures!

Interesting to see that the readings at your location are constantly higher than the calibration data recorded here prior to shipping the unit to you.

@Conundrum: that would be great!
Back to top
Mads Barnkob
Wed Jan 22 2014, 10:02PM
Mads Barnkob Registered Member #1403 Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 06:05PM
Location: Denmark, Odense C
Posts: 1968
radhoo wrote ...

Mads Barnkob wrote ...

Unit #11000003 is now live at: Link2 and Link2

I will post pictures of the installation in the upcoming weekend.
Looks great, Mads, and looking forward to your pictures!

Interesting to see that the readings at your location are constantly higher than the calibration data recorded here prior to shipping the unit to you.

@Conundrum: that would be great!

It is located half a meter from my window out on the balcony, on the 2nd floor(top), approximately 8 meters above ground. Other than that, it must just be my location in the world that makes a difference or tube characteristics changed in shipping? :)
Back to top
radhoo
Thu Jan 23 2014, 07:10AM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 700
I would assume something is different at your location, unless the height has such a great impact. (I will test this too, soon, also model C will also have an altimeter built in).
Normally we all should have mounted our units at 1m above the ground, but this is not always possible for practical reasons.

Talking about variations, in a similar way, the readings in Chicago show smaller values (11000002).
Waiting for Tobias to add his unit (11000004), and another one in Germany as I am curios to see what we find there.

Nevertheless these are all small values, hope to never see them on a rising trend ("uptrend"?)

Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jan 23 2014, 10:16AM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
radhoo wrote ...

I would assume something is different at your location, unless the height has such a great impact. (I will test this too, soon, also model C will also have an altimeter built in).
Normally we all should have mounted our units at 1m above the ground, but this is not always possible for practical reasons.

Talking about variations, in a similar way, the readings in Chicago show smaller values (11000002).
Waiting for Tobias to add his unit (11000004), and another one in Germany as I am curios to see what we find there.

Nevertheless these are all small values, hope to never see them on a rising trend ("uptrend"?)



I shall be joining the project soon, and so have a few words to say.

I don't thinking it likely that the characteristics of Mads' GM tube will have changed significantly in transit.

Height above ground is a key factor in environmental monitoring. Airborne particulates descending to earth will only spend a very short time in close proximity to the detector, but will remain on the ground below for very long periods. Where there is a significant distance between the ground and the detector, the radiation coming from particles fallen to the ground will be attenuated by the air, and still more so in rain, mist and fog. This is because the gamma intensity - in our case measured in counts per second - decreases with the square of the distance, which means that if we double the distance to the ground, counts due to the ground will go down four times.

Clearly, this air attenuation is selective for gamma photon energy, with high energy photons being able to penetrate greater distances through the air, and still have enough energy left to knock electrons out of the GM tube wall, which is the main mode of gamma detection in GM tubes.
Back to top
Sync
Thu Jan 23 2014, 11:35AM
Sync Registered Member #510 Joined: Sat Feb 10 2007, 09:28AM
Location: Hannover
Posts: 12
The reason is most likely just other geological features or Mads balcony emits a few betas.

In Germany the nation wide ODL (Ortsdosisleistung/local dose rate) network has standardized to a tube heigt of 1.3m off ground and at least 400m² of free space around a node.
The problem being, without knowing the isotope footprint at the location you cannot be sure that hard betas will not offset the measured rate.
Sometimes there can be a misinterpetation of up to 2-3 times the actual value because using the tubes at the very low end of their range causes nonlinearities that you cannot easily compensate.

The Germans use VacuTec 70031 tubes which have a very high sensitivity, 840counts per minute at 1µSv/h [¹³⁷Cs].
Back to top
tobias
Thu Jan 23 2014, 11:38AM
tobias Registered Member #1956 Joined: Wed Feb 04 2009, 01:22PM
Location: Jersey City
Posts: 172
PM, that behavior goes against the higher readings by Mad's unit.
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jan 23 2014, 01:20PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
tobias wrote ...

PM, that behavior goes against the higher readings by Mad's unit.

But radiation from local geology - especially radon geology - and building contruction materials are major contributors to the total background count. The aggregates used in concrete mixes can and sometimes do cause significant differences in radioactivity from concretes that can affect readings in single buildings, groups of buildings, towns, roads or concrete transport structures, and so on. *

Cosmic rays form a significant part of any background count, and counting will not be significantly affected by changes in detector height in the decametre regime. I found that when a very large glass GM tube type G12 was shielded (actually filtered) with 10mm Pb/2mm Al, the diurnal variation due to cosmic rays was easily observed without statistical enhancement, an xy time/counts plot resembling a very 'flattened' sine-wave.

Here are some average backgrounds, country by country:

1390483199 543 FT155675 Natural Background Radiation By Country


* Radiological Protection Principles concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials, European Commission 112, 1999, free pdf here Link2

*NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY IN BUILDING MATERIALS - CZECH EXPERIENCE AND EUROPEAN LEGISLATION Proceedings of the American Association of Radon Scientists and Technologists 2008 International Symposium Las Vegas NV, September 14-17, 2008, free pdf here: Link2

*Radioactivity in Building Materials: a first Overview of the European Scenario Italian National Institute of Occupational Safety and Prevention (ISPESL)Department of Occupational Hygiene, Via Fontana Candida 1, 00040 Monteporzio Catone
(Rome), Italy, free pdf here: Link2

Tobias, this one is specially for you: THE RADIOLOGICAL ACCIDENT IN GOIANIA International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1988, free pdf here: Link2
Back to top
radhoo
Thu Jan 23 2014, 06:09PM
radhoo Registered Member #1938 Joined: Sun Jan 25 2009, 12:44PM
Location: Romania
Posts: 700
Sync wrote ...

In Germany the nation wide ODL (Ortsdosisleistung/local dose rate) network has standardized to a tube heigt of 1.3m off ground and at least 400m² of free space around a node.
I it is very similar here too. For all the units I sent out I recommended mounting them at 1m above the soil, but this is not possible for practical reasons.
However the next models will have an altimeter, allowing for some compensation for the radiation absorption in air - if we consider the usual model, also suggested by Stella : airborne radioactive particles falling down to the soil and emitting radiation from that level.

ps: Regarding the hard betas, keep in mind that the units are enclosed in a ~ 1mm thick aluminum case, so what we're seeing is almost entirely gamma radiation.

ps2: #12000008 went online today in Germany Link2


Proud Mary wrote ...

Here are some average backgrounds, country by country:

1390483199 543 FT155675 Natural Background Radiation By Country

Nice one! :)
Back to top
Proud Mary
Thu Jan 23 2014, 08:59PM
Proud Mary Registered Member #543 Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
radhoo wrote ...

ps: Regarding the hard betas, keep in mind that the units are enclosed in a ~ 1mm thick aluminum case, so what we're seeing is almost entirely gamma radiation.

...with a small but significant percentage of cosmic ray muons, showing diurnal and semi-diurnal variations including modulation by the 22-year solar cycle.

The state of the solar cycle should be considered when analysing trends in counting rate.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.