Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 88
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

I need something faster than a 555 timer.

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Ash Small
Thu May 23 2013, 05:16PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
ben123324 wrote ...

just a question for my benefit- what happens if you don't have a perfect fall time? the arc is sustained during the cycle where the exhaust is being vented? That does no harm though right?

Well, I'm still in the early stages of what might be described as a 'feasibility study', I'm reading up on CCM flyback operation. The 'spark' will last for <1mS, but during that millisecond the MOSFET will switch <1000 times @ <1MHz (the figures are only a guide at the moment). The reason being that at faster switching speeds I can have more (much more) volts per turn, so therefore, much less turns.

It will get hot, but as it's only running for 1mS every 20-50mS or so (less than 5% duty cycle) I'm hoping it won't be too much of an issue.

During that millisecond that it is operating, due to the capacitance on the output side (10pF in the plug, plus stray capacitance, plus maybe added capacitance if required), the output voltage will rise until breakdown, then current will continue to flow at a lower voltage (that's the theory anyway).

With the MOSFET switching at those speeds, shorter switching time means lower switching losses, plus the faster the turn off time, the higher the voltage peak on the output.

So I really want to start with something that switches as fast as possible, to increase efficiency.

Tjhe whole idea relies on the small duty cycle of a few % allowing me to push everything further than would be possible at higher duty cycles, but I still want to keep losses to a minimum.
Back to top
...
Thu May 23 2013, 09:46PM
... Registered Member #56 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:02AM
Location: Southern Califorina, USA
Posts: 2445
Might be able to get away with the 7555 (which is just an upgraded 555) ex Link2

Back to top
Ash Small
Thu May 23 2013, 10:05PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Thanks. I can see (I think) that with the 'newer' 555 chips I'll need a MOSFET totem pole to drive the main MOSFET, as they appear to be lower power units (I think).

I'm still reading up on CCM flybacks, and I'm learning I may have made a few incorrect assumptions, but I'll get there in the end.
Back to top
Ash Small
Fri May 24 2013, 03:54PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Just supposing I was to use a MOSFET with a turn on delay of 8.8nS, a fall time of 21nS, a turn off delay of 38nS and a rise time of 34nS, like, for example, this CREE SiC Z-FET for ~£20 (I realise this one is only rated for ~50A pulsed drain current, but I could probably push it a bit with less than 5% duty cycle, and others are available), How should I drive it at these fequencies? GDT?

Link2
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat May 25 2013, 02:52PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Jan Martis made a nice flyback driver based on the UC3842 (or was it the UC3845?) The great advantage of this chip is its current-mode operation that limits the current through the switching device irrespective of the load. It might not go to 1MHz, but it should be fast enough.

IGBTs can be overloaded much more for short periods than MOSFETs. The MOSFET's finite Rds(on) limits the current, but the IGBT's minority carriers kick in and just keep delivering more and more current. Effectively the Rds(on) gets smaller the more current you draw. That's why we all use IGBTs in our DRSSTCs.

Or you could buy an ignition coil... tongue
Back to top
Ash Small
Sat May 25 2013, 03:10PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve Conner wrote ...

Jan Martis made a nice flyback driver based on the UC3842 (or was it the UC3845?) The great advantage of this chip is its current-mode operation that limits the current through the switching device irrespective of the load. It might not go to 1MHz, but it should be fast enough.

IGBTs can be overloaded much more for short periods than MOSFETs. The MOSFET's finite Rds(on) limits the current, but the IGBT's minority carriers kick in and just keep delivering more and more current. Effectively the Rds(on) gets smaller the more current you draw. That's why we all use IGBTs in our DRSSTCs.

Or you could buy an ignition coil... tongue

I'll look at Jan's page later. Thanks.

What concerns me regarding IGBT's is is firstly, the 'tail off' at switch off, which is not ideal for flyback topology, and secondly, they don't like high frequencies.

I thought it might be worth looking at SiC Z-FET's here, as they might offer advantages over standard MOSFET's, and they are starting to become affordable.

EDIT: They also seem to have quite a low Rds(on)

Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Sat May 25 2013, 04:35PM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
If you're driving open loop, you could also use one of those Function Generator ICs. I think they can go up to a few MHz at least. Like the Maxim MAX035 or whatever the number was. Exar also has a few function generator and timing ICs that might go into the MHz region.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Sat May 25 2013, 06:52PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
the 74HC14 can do several tens of MHz
Back to top
speakerguy79
Sat May 25 2013, 11:06PM
speakerguy79 Registered Member #1460 Joined: Thu May 01 2008, 12:45AM
Location:
Posts: 19
The fastest I could get my CMOS based 555 timer from TI (can't remember the exact PN) was right around 2MHz.

I think the dedicated frequency generator ICs are getting hard to find. I played with an XR2206 years ago and can't find them anymore.

If you are comfortable with microcontrollers and can shield them adequately, you could use a DDS chip from Analog Devices with a PIC or something and have incredibly accurate frequency control and ridiculous range. Even their smallest 10-pin devices will do up to 12.5MHz in something like 0.1Hz steps. Check out the AD9833 if this interests you.
Back to top
Ben Solon
Sun May 26 2013, 01:49AM
Ben Solon Registered Member #3900 Joined: Thu May 19 2011, 08:28PM
Location:
Posts: 600
If I can make another suggestion, you could build a Colpitts oscillator and rather than having a crystal, use a variable inductor to form a circuit equivalent to the typical crystal.

Here's a modified ltspice document I adapted to fit your needs:


1369532945 3900 FT154157 Colpitts Fft


It was previously using just a crystal to simulate an rf amplifier I’ve been working on.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.