Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 61
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
01/31 Mathias (41)
01/31 slash128v6 (52)
02/01 Barry (70)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

UD 2.1 DRSSTC Build

first  3 4 5 6 
Move Thread LAN_403
Feathers
Mon Apr 22 2013, 03:10AM
Feathers Registered Member #10052 Joined: Thu Feb 07 2013, 11:31PM
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 78
I get it! Ben I appreciate your explanation, it makes sense now.

So the resistor turns the scary gate-emitter-GDT LC circuit into a damped LRC circuit, and the diode is to minimize fall times.

And the resistor value is a trade-off between rise-time and damping. That value would have to increase with increasing gate capacitance (decreasing oscillation frequencies), but coils running such large IGBT's would (hopefully) be operating at lower frequencies, and the extended rise-time would not be so large a problem.

I think I'll start with the 2W 5.1 ohm and see where that gets me.

Thanks again!
Back to top
Adam Munich
Mon Apr 22 2013, 12:39PM
Adam Munich Registered Member #2893 Joined: Tue Jun 01 2010, 09:25PM
Location: Cali-forn. i. a.
Posts: 2242
If I may ask, what trace had to be rerouted on that board (and to where?)

I have one here that I'd like to get working smile
Back to top
nixie
Mon Apr 22 2013, 01:35PM
nixie Registered Member #3908 Joined: Tue May 24 2011, 09:40PM
Location: Gilbert, Arizona USA
Posts: 68
gren wrote ...

If I may ask, what trace had to be rerouted on that board (and to where?)

I have one here that I'd like to get working smile


There was a thread about it awhile back, with a closeup image of the board rework.
Link2

Regards, Jeff

Back to top
Feathers
Tue Apr 23 2013, 11:45PM
Feathers Registered Member #10052 Joined: Thu Feb 07 2013, 11:31PM
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 78
Its the "2.1" but the fix in that link is still necessary and applicable. Just cutting a trace and a short jumper.
Back to top
Physics Junkie
Wed Apr 24 2013, 12:22AM
Physics Junkie Registered Member #7267 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2012, 12:16AM
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 407
Just curious, are you going to use bipolar TVS from C-E? It seems the general consensus is that they are not necessary on the large bricks. Im wondering because I am also building a coil using dual module bricks and I'm wondering if I should get them.
Back to top
HV Enthusiast
Wed Apr 24 2013, 01:19AM
HV Enthusiast Registered Member #15 Joined: Thu Feb 02 2006, 01:11PM
Location:
Posts: 3068
Physics Junkie wrote ...

Just curious, are you going to use bipolar TVS from C-E? It seems the general consensus is that they are not necessary on the large bricks. Im wondering because I am also building a coil using dual module bricks and I'm wondering if I should get them.

Unless you are using some relatively large TVS, the general run-of-the-mill TVS (i.e. 1.5kW 1.5KE types) won't really do much as the energy behind the transients is much too great for these small TVS to handle. The best way to mitigate over voltage spikes on these types of circuits is simply to reduce your parasitic inductance as much as possible through the use of good layout, twisted pairs, and other methods. Keep components close together, route your plus and negative (return) planes directly on top of each other to reduce inductance (maximize coupling) and any time you have standard wire, twist together the outgoing and returns to reduce inductance.

Just remember with inductance, current does not want to stop instaneously. So if the IGBTs are conducting lots of current, and you open up an IGBT (switch OFF), the current wants to continue to flow and the inductance will develop a voltage across it (voltage spike) to keep the current flowing.

Mitigate by careful layout and also ensure you have soft switching (i.e. current is zero at switch transitions)
Back to top
Physics Junkie
Wed Apr 24 2013, 02:38AM
Physics Junkie Registered Member #7267 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2012, 12:16AM
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 407
EasternVoltageResearch wrote ...


Unless you are using some relatively large TVS, the general run-of-the-mill TVS (i.e. 1.5kW 1.5KE types) won't really do much as the energy behind the transients is much too great for these small TVS to handle. The best way to mitigate over voltage spikes on these types of circuits is simply to reduce your parasitic inductance as much as possible through the use of good layout, twisted pairs, and other methods. Keep components close together, route your plus and negative (return) planes directly on top of each other to reduce inductance (maximize coupling) and any time you have standard wire, twist together the outgoing and returns to reduce inductance.

Just remember with inductance, current does not want to stop instaneously. So if the IGBTs are conducting lots of current, and you open up an IGBT (switch OFF), the current wants to continue to flow and the inductance will develop a voltage across it (voltage spike) to keep the current flowing.

Mitigate by careful layout and also ensure you have soft switching (i.e. current is zero at switch transitions)

I'm using 1/8" thick aluminum bars between the IGBT's. The DC supply caps are mounted practically directly to the IGBT's which are also so close they are almost touching, so I think inductance is as low as possible. Thanks for the good info!
Back to top
Feathers
Wed Apr 24 2013, 03:31AM
Feathers Registered Member #10052 Joined: Thu Feb 07 2013, 11:31PM
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 78
The TVS diodes are actually going from gate to emitter. I believe this is to protect against spikes on the emitter that couple capacitively to the gate. (G-E capacitance)

I bought some 1.5KE30CAs.

I'm also buying some 5.1, 7.5, and 10 ohm 2W damping resistors to paralell with a schottky diode on the gate. I suppose its just a matter of scoping, trial and error. I'll start with the 5.1.

Everything seem alright?
Back to top
Physics Junkie
Wed Apr 24 2013, 04:23AM
Physics Junkie Registered Member #7267 Joined: Tue Oct 16 2012, 12:16AM
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 407
Yup thats all good. And what I meant was TVS that are commonly used between C-E for smaller IGBT packages like the SOT-227, using 2 of 1.5KE220CA (220V) in series or a single 440V. But Like Dan said, these diodes arn't necessary nor can they handle the higher power of bricks. I was wondering because I hardly see anyone use them anymore with larger bricks IGBT's
Back to top
Goodchild
Wed Apr 24 2013, 04:55AM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
That's because if the bridge is designed correctly (Low inductance) and/or you use phase lead; TVS is simply not needed.
Back to top
first  3 4 5 6 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.