Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 85
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/07 Dave Marshall (40)
11/07 Worms (46)
11/08 Bert (77)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Need Help Related to Rotational Inertia

Move Thread LAN_403
BigBad
Fri Feb 22 2013, 01:14AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Ash Small wrote ...

"Cyclic pitch changes are accomplished by tilting the swashplate. Collective pitch changes are accomplished by vertical movement of the swashplate. Combined collective and cyclic pitch changes result from combined control inputs by the pilot." Link2

The Chinook steers by tilting the swashplate, thus giving more lift on one side than on the other.

The rorors , I think, from watching them (they fly over, and sometimes past the windows, of my house all the time), and due to the fact that both rotors can be driven by each engine, always spin at the same speed, relative to each other, thus cancelling out any torque reaction. Tilting fore and aft is accomplished by vertical movement of the swashplates. Foreward motion is achieved by increasing the angle of the rear rotors, thereby tilting the whole craft foreward, as far as I can tell.
Everything you've written is true, but there's the second order effects...

It's like when you fly a plane, to turn right, you move the stick to the right and it banks the aircraft. But when you fly a glider, you have to stick to the right, and coordinate it with a bit of rudder because you get differential drag from the ailerons that yaws the aircraft (this is actually why aircraft have tail rudders, the Wright brothers first aircraft didn't, and kept crashing from the yaw!!!) A lot of aircraft (but not so much gliders) have a cross coupling built into the controls, so that the rudder is thrown in for free and the pilot doesn't have to worry about it.

Also with an aircraft, if you apply only rudder, a fixed wing aircraft naturally banks, although some control systems will apply ailerons to cancel it out.

The Chinook is kinda like that, and even more complicated.

It's one of these things that pilots aren't particularly aware of.

When you build aircraft from scratch you more or less have to know the details of the particular cross couplings and make sure you can deal with them. Here, notably there is drag from the rotors, which depend on speed, and there's the various gyroscopic effects as the rotors change angles and if they change speeds.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Feb 22 2013, 05:04AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
in high mach, roll-pitch inertia coupling is a problem that took quite awhile to understand, and several killed test pilots... And very nearly killed Chuck Yeager.
Back to top
Patrick
Fri Feb 22 2013, 10:00PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
1:57, another test flight completed. moving the battery (248g) 3 inches back allows the body to stay nearly level, instead of -20', but at 5 inches it too far back. So, having moved the battery to the 3 " postition levels the flight and reduces the significance of the nose problem, though it still exists.
Im wondering if this nose up problem is entirely aerodynamic, that front is wide and long, so air acting on it would generate force. (If so, it would approximate a ball resting on the top of a concave down parababola, unstable, and accelerating.)


3:04 pm, another test flight completed. significant improvement, explained below.

1361574615 2431 FT1630 Special Settings
This screen cap shows all my flight prgrammables features. Only some are activated.



From the larger screen cap, this shows what all previous flights were flown with, only modding these PID values.



Seen here the Level PID values, i have no explanation what these did, so in two hours i just played with the values.

I have found, that the Level PID values, (a feature which only exisists in MW2.1) results in:

First, default values are: [7, 0.010, 100] (P,I,D)
Second, P=0, no movement of servos at all, reguardless of I and D.
third, D=0, no movement of servos at all, reguardless of P and I.
foruth, I can be zero or higher, servos still function.
fitfh, with [10, 0, 100] the nose up condidtion is greatly reduced!


3:52pm, Next test flight has been completed.
Lesson learned: dont let prop tip strike cement. All brass flung off.
second, brass is still needed on the tips, but much less than 600mg, im thinking 200mg or less now, which will improve battery time, and roll response.

i still dont know how to effrectivly attach brass to a glass-nylon prop tip... CA breaks off after a while.



Back to top
Patrick
Sun Feb 24 2013, 11:00PM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639


I think the above video ilustrates teh nose-up, tail down loss of control...


Back to top
BigBad
Mon Feb 25 2013, 01:13AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
OK, here's the easiest way I can explain what I think is happening. First, let's forget gravity.

There was once a guy called Gerard O'Neill.

He designed these space habitats called Island 3, great long spinning cylinders, arranged side-by-side in parallel, in pairs, which were counter-rotating, connected at the end via bearings with straight couplings in between.

Anyway, they had to keep the ends pointed at the sun.

So they had a scheme by which they could twist the pair of cylinders along an axis through the centre that was parallel to the couplings at the ends. (They had another scheme for twisting the whole structure parallel to the long axis, but nevermind that right now).

What they worked out was that if they shortened one of the couplings, then the cylinders would start to spin around the central axis, and it would only stop when they made it the same again, and if they lengthened it, it would twist the other way. As long as they weren't the same length, it would continue to twist one way or another.

I think that's what's causing your nose-up/backwards and forwards tendency.
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Feb 25 2013, 02:22AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639


this is even better video of my problem, tell me what you think...
Back to top
BigBad
Mon Feb 25 2013, 03:35AM
BigBad Registered Member #2529 Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Are your rotors spinning the wrong way? What happens when you swap them over?
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Feb 25 2013, 04:59AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
BigBad wrote ...

Are your rotors spinning the wrong way? What happens when you swap them over?
No, i made doubly sure i have them right...




Big breakthrough!!!
first, i payed attention not just to my machine this time, but also my self, it started moving to fast., so i pitched back, with the adition of significan I value for the Pitch PID loop, the nose went up, but it wasnt catatrophic--started to level off (which had never been seen before) and then i instincively throttle back, and saw the tail drop, nose trying to stay level...

so i believe now, im contributing to the problem, by retarding the throttle in anticipation of the crash

to bad i dont have video...
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Mon Feb 25 2013, 08:20AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Ah, we've been ignoring the most complicated part of the overall control loop!

Google for 'pilot induced oscillation'
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Feb 25 2013, 10:24AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
If you think you might be part of the problem, try to use only half as much control effort as you think you ought to. Eg, if you want to pull the stick all the way back, just pull it halfway.
Back to top

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.