If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2529
Joined: Thu Dec 10 2009, 02:43AM
Location:
Posts: 600
Pinky's Brain wrote ...
I tried, but it didn't come across ... lets assume the insulation is 100% effective and the temperature of the surfaces are only dependent on the balance between convective heat transfer from the air to the tiles and the radiative heat loss. The air heated at the bow flows past the surfaces of the vehicle, losing some heat but conceivably can stay significantly hotter than those surfaces. Then when it gets turbulent it can transfer more heat (turbulence breaks up the boundary layers which act as insulation) thus shifting the energy balance and making the underlying surfaces hotter even if no new heating of the air occurs due to friction.
Yup, that's exactly my understanding. Also I read once that NASA found in practice that the place (both temporally and physically) where the turbulent flow developed depends on the smoothness of the tiles. During reentry I believe it starts off with purely laminar flow, and then during the descent the turbulence forms as the density of the air increases (i.e. the Reynolds number goes up). On some flights the turbulence developed at significantly higher speeds, and in a location that was further forwards, and the total heat transfer jumped up markedly, it was probably because they had some sticky out spacer strips between the tiles and perhaps other more subtle differences.
TLDR summary: it's all horrible heat flow stuff; and the Shuttle is a particularly complex shape which doesn't help
The compression is where most of the significant heat rise is coming from, with minor contribuitions from adhesison, viscous forces, mice flatus, waffles, friction and peanut butter. Thus, (as per BigBad and AndrewM's points) we can presume this process to be almost perfectly isentropic.
This might be true but it is not at all obvious. I'd expect the pressure in the shockwave to be roughly linearly dependent on the velocity of the air hitting it by the argument, that you need some force to keep the shockwave compressed. Adiabatic compression rules would imply a slower increase of temperature, e.g. p^2/7 for a diatomic gas. The energy of the air hitting the shockwave scales as v^2, v being the velocity of the air. So how can the temperature increase due to compression account for all the kinetic energy of the air?
Edit: I forgot the air mass per time factor in above relations, i.e. Shockwave pressure ~ mass/time * v ~ v^2 leading to a temperature rise proportional v^4/7 in the adiabatic limit Kinetic energy of air ~ mass/time * v^2 ~ v^3. To get an estimate on how hot the air would get, the speed of heat removal due to airflow needs to be taken into account, which would perhaps be T * mass/time, which would make the temperature proportional to v^2. I've seen the wiki article about Atmospheric entry, which states that the heat comes from isoentropic compression, but I don't understand, why that is so. Possibly the kinetic energy of the gas ic consumed mostly by molecular dissociation, so that the pressure in the shockwave is much lower than suggested by an ideal gas law.
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.