Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 124
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Mathias (41)
slash128v6 (52)


Next birthdays
02/01 Barry (70)
02/01 Snowcat (37)
02/01 wylie (43)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: Tesla Coils
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

SCR power control for an SSTC any ideas?

1 2 3 
Move Thread LAN_403
brandon3055
Mon Aug 13 2012, 03:44AM Print
brandon3055 Registered Member #4548 Joined: Mon Apr 23 2012, 03:52AM
Location: tasmania
Posts: 271
Hello everyone

Dose anyone know how to build a voltage controller for an sstc using scr’s I understand the basic principle but I’m not shore how to build it also is this even a practical way to control an sstc or would it be better to build a buck converter (I would like to keep it as simple as possible) I ask this now because I recently got two high power scr’s from a junk yard (they test ok) I haven’t been able to find a datasheet on them but I will post the part number when I get home tonight.

I have already searched the forum and Google but haven’t found anything useful on this topic but if I missed anything please post a link

Thanks in advance
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Tue Aug 14 2012, 06:45PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
There would be problems with peak currents and ringing because of the snubber cap on the bridge. The best way is to make the interrupter work in "phase angle" mode (delayed turn-on with mains sync).
Back to top
Luceš
Tue Aug 14 2012, 10:19PM
Luceš Registered Member #4108 Joined: Sun Sept 25 2011, 11:43PM
Location:
Posts: 149
on my vttc I have controlled the power with a cathode follower and by adjusting the amplitude, should be the same principle
Back to top
Goodchild
Wed Aug 15 2012, 08:00AM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
I have found if you use SCRs with a largish filter cap you can control the voltage on it rather easily. A simple 555 circuit even works fine. Steve C has some great info on his website about a 555 based SCR controller. I built one a while back using a MCU for use with my DRSSTC and it worked rather well. Basically 2 SCRs and 2 caps (2000uF I think) in a basic doubler configuration. It is controlled similar to how Dr. Dark Current was explaining, the turn on of the SCR is delayed in reference to the mins cycle.

No delay = full power
full delay (delay of a full half cycle) = no power

The only thing you have to watch out for is the power factor. It will be horrid at any place other than full power and even then you will be lucky to see 0.7 or 0.8 because after all it is a diode charging a big cap. wink

If you are interested here are some photos of my SCR based controller Link2


Also a link to Steve C's controller Link2
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Wed Aug 15 2012, 09:30AM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Goodchild, the way you describe it is very hard on the SCRs and filter caps, because of the huge peak currents present. The normal way of dealing with this is to add an inductor in series. However this would be dangerous for a SSTC running on unfiltered mains, because the inductance together with the snubber cap capacitance could create some oscillations and the bridge could see dangerous voltage peaks.

What I was describing is to control the actual interrupter of the TC (enable pins on gate drivers).
Back to top
brandon3055
Wed Aug 15 2012, 01:15PM
brandon3055 Registered Member #4548 Joined: Mon Apr 23 2012, 03:52AM
Location: tasmania
Posts: 271
Thanks for the useful information I think I might try steve C's controller would using PFC on the ac output help at all? Also dose anyone have any thoughts on using a buck converter
Back to top
Goodchild
Wed Aug 15 2012, 04:48PM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Destroyer of mosfets wrote ...

Thanks for the useful information I think I might try steve C's controller would using PFC on the ac output help at all? Also dose anyone have any thoughts on using a buck converter

The only real advantages with a SCR supply is that it's robust and simple. Other than that they kinda suck.

If you used a PFC you may as well just use the PFC or a buck although this would be rather complex. Personally I stick with precharging systems and use my interrupter to control the output (PWM type control). A variac although heavy is also a great option.

Dr. Dark Current, yes it can be hard on the SCRs but it's no different than what a bridge rectifier sees charging a bus cap. SCRs are very rugged like diodes and as long as the correct rating is chosen it's not a big deal.
Back to top
Dr. Dark Current
Wed Aug 15 2012, 05:25PM
Dr. Dark Current Registered Member #152 Joined: Sun Feb 12 2006, 03:36PM
Location: Czech Rep.
Posts: 3384
Goodchild wrote ...

Dr. Dark Current, yes it can be hard on the SCRs but it's no different than what a bridge rectifier sees charging a bus cap.
It indeed IS different. A non-controlled rectifier, even if we disregard mains impedance, draws current pulses of finite length and amplitude, but the pulses through a SCR controller with no additional impedance (inductance) are infinitely short and large. The mains impedance and the ESR of the cap are the only things limiting the pulse current.
Back to top
brandon3055
Wed Aug 15 2012, 11:15PM
brandon3055 Registered Member #4548 Joined: Mon Apr 23 2012, 03:52AM
Location: tasmania
Posts: 271
Thanks for all the replies I will go with Steve c's driver and this is one of the scr's I have
it is an scr you just cant see the gate pin from the angle the pic was taken
Also I just have one more question I'm not 100% shore how the power section should be set up should it look like A or B
Back to top
Goodchild
Wed Aug 15 2012, 11:25PM
Goodchild Registered Member #2292 Joined: Fri Aug 14 2009, 05:33PM
Location: The Wild West AKA Arizona
Posts: 795
Dr. Dark Current wrote ...

Goodchild wrote ...

Dr. Dark Current, yes it can be hard on the SCRs but it's no different than what a bridge rectifier sees charging a bus cap.
It indeed IS different. A non-controlled rectifier, even if we disregard mains impedance, draws current pulses of finite length and amplitude, but the pulses through a SCR controller with no additional impedance (inductance) are infinitely short and large. The mains impedance and the ESR of the cap are the only things limiting the pulse current.


Yes this is true but also applies just the same to a regular rectifier. During the short period of time that the voltage goes above the voltage across the cap you are charging, you get a very small very high current pulse limited only by the ESR and line impedance.

This is the same with SCRs because they are in fact just controlled diodes in the same configuration doing the same operation. The difference is the placement of this short spike in relation to the mains voltage. Because the SCR is delayed in turn on this pulse can happen any place on the cycle making for a very poor power factor and higher peak currents (due to the voltage on the cap having to fall lower before it is charged) At full power (no delay) it is acting exactly like a regular uncontrolled rectifier and the current spike is situated some what in the center of the cycle like a regular rectifier.


Not saying an inductor in series with the input line is a bad idea, on the contrary it can help improve the PF by spreading out the short pulses of current. However if you only use an SCR supply to precharge a system up to an operating voltage and then use it like a regular rectifier this inductor is unnecessary.

If you plan to use the supply like a variac to control input power then the inductor should be used in series with the input.

Back to top
1 2 3 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.