Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 63
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

PID + servo PWM... how to implement !?

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Patrick
Mon Jul 09 2012, 03:12AM Print
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
hey everybody my brain is not able to wrap around this problem. i need to go from angles and velocities to RC servo PWMs, so am i not understanding the implemantation of a pid?

is it possible for a pid to not be aware of the pwm, and only the result? ordoes the output need to be "normalized" somehow to be complatiable with the rc pwm?

im using this C example for my code: Link2
Back to top
AndrewM
Mon Jul 09 2012, 03:13AM
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
I'll need a video before I can be of any assistance.
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Jul 09 2012, 03:17AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
AndrewM wrote ...

I'll need a video before I can be of any assistance.
Ha!! i knew it.
Back to top
Mattski
Mon Jul 09 2012, 06:49AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
What variable are you trying to control? My understanding was that servomotors are already controlling their shaft position based on the input pulse time so there's no need for a PID loop. If you're trying to control velocity I'm not sure you can with a servomotor because you don't have feedback from the shaft sensor.
Back to top
Patrick
Mon Jul 09 2012, 06:52AM
Patrick Registered Member #2431 Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Mattski wrote ...

What variable are you trying to control? My understanding was that servomotors are already controlling their shaft position based on the input pulse time so there's no need for a PID loop. If you're trying to control velocity I'm not sure you can with a servomotor because you don't have feedback from the shaft sensor.
well its my tilt rotor fans and angular position im trying to control with a pid + complementary filter.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Mon Jul 09 2012, 07:19AM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
You probably don;t need PID to control the fan angle, just set the PWM to to required position and let the servo get there. If that's too fast, ramp the PWM request to the servo.
Back to top
radiotech
Mon Jul 09 2012, 08:01AM
radiotech Registered Member #2463 Joined: Wed Nov 11 2009, 03:49AM
Location:
Posts: 1546
Whatever is driving the motor, the input may or may not describe the
position of the shaft.

What is used with machinery today is a shaft encoder. These are called resolvers
and replace the old tach that was used with analog PID loops.

Link2
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Jul 09 2012, 02:45PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
It's the magic of negative feedback. The "I" term of the PID will make the output go to whatever value it takes to reduce the error to zero.

Say your PID was implemented with 16-bit integers, then the output would have a range of -32768 to 32767. You just need to adapt this to the range of the PWM module on the microcontroller, which might be 0 to 1023, but not all of that range may correspond to valid inputs for a RC servo. So some scaling and maybe saturation might be needed, and as soon as you do saturation you should probably implement anti-windup for the I term too.

If your PID is implemented in floating point, you may want to think twice before using it in an embedded application. And if you don't understand the difference between fixed and floating point, you should probably think twice before trying to write an embedded application. tongue

RC model servos already have a PID loop inside to control the motor so that shaft position (sensed by a pot inside the servo) tracks the input pulse width.

That's all I'm saying without a video :)
Back to top
AndrewM
Mon Jul 09 2012, 03:41PM
AndrewM Registered Member #49 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:05AM
Location: Bigass Pile of Penguins
Posts: 362
The servos really aren't what he wants to control; he wants to control his vehicle's pitch/roll for which he gets feedback from his gyro and accels. Servos are fast compared to the vehicle dynamics, so generally you'd model them as "perfect"/instantaneous since, as Steve says, they have their own PID controller already.

Patrick, you don't need to do anything special. Develop a function and controller that generates the servo positions as output. Servo position-to-PWM is 1:1 so just translate the output with a simple transfer function.

THAT ONE WAS FOR FREE WHERE'S THE VIDEO!??!?
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon Jul 09 2012, 08:46PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Well, you hope servos are fast compared to the vehicle dynamics, but from the video (yay!) the tilt rotor looks pretty skittish. I think the wooden pole needs fastened on tighter.

I guess the way the system works is this: The Kalman filter spits out a 6-dimensional estimate of the vehicle position. (3 translation, 3 rotation.) Or maybe it works with velocities or accelerations, I don't know.

A 6-D vector of the desired position (or velocity or acceleration) is derived from the RC control inputs.

Then 6 PID controllers are used to derive 6 error signals, one for each dimension, which get mixed down in some sort of transformation matrix to drive the servos.

Things are complicated (or maybe simplified? :)) if the craft doesn't have control authority in every dimension. So for instance, a copter doesn't have independent control over translation in the horizontal plane. If it wants to translate, it first has to tilt itself (rotate) so that the downward thrust vector points partly sideways. So rotation and translation are all mixed together. I have no idea how this is handled by an autopilot.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.