Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 81
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
dan (37)
rchydro (64)
CapRack (30)


Next birthdays
11/06 dan (37)
11/06 rchydro (64)
11/06 CapRack (30)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Science and Electronics
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Which oscilloscope?

first  2 3 4 5 
Move Thread LAN_403
PhilGood
Tue Jul 10 2012, 09:13PM
PhilGood Registered Member #3806 Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
I read many topics on seeedstudio forum in the Tech Support >> DSO Quad section Link2

This (and many of the posts in this thread) gave me some understanding of why it is so hard for a digital scope to behave close to an analog one.

I'm definitly going to buy an analog scope as my first one.

I think a digital scope might be a good choice for a 2nd scope, after comparing many models, it seems 500$ is the minimal price to get something decent.

Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Jul 11 2012, 06:32AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Yes, digital and analog scopes complement each other, a really well-equipped lab should have one of each.

Tektronix's Digital Phosphor scopes are the most "analoguey" I've seen. However they are seriously expensive.
Back to top
PhilGood
Wed Jul 11 2012, 07:50AM
PhilGood Registered Member #3806 Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
I was seriously considering buying the 5441 :

Image010

But there might be a big problem with this scope, because of the 5A22N modules that have a bandwith of only 1MHz ! frown
5a22n user manual: Link2

I really don't get why Tek made a module with such a low bandwith for a mainframe that has a capability of 50+ MHz ... ???

I could try to find 5a48 dual trace amplifier modules, they have a bandwith of 50MHz Link2 , but there aren't many available, and they are all sold "as is"...

______________________


I found a very nice gallery of Tektronix old models. It provides descriptions and pictures of circuitry for many old scopes and plugins.
The site also features an HP gallery and many other brands misc test equipments. Repair instructions for some models.

B11
Back to top
Shrad
Wed Jul 11 2012, 09:10AM
Shrad Registered Member #3215 Joined: Sun Sept 19 2010, 08:42PM
Location:
Posts: 780
I have one or two plugins for a 5441, and I might not live far away from your location (Belgium, 20 mins away from Lille)

If you buy it, be sure to send me a PM and we'll work something out
Back to top
Steve Conner
Wed Jul 11 2012, 07:44PM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I think the 5441 and 5A22 would normally be used for applications like looking at ECGs in a biology lab. They have very high gain (the knob goes down to microvolts per div) and the low bandwidth is a necessary consequence of the high gain.

Not really a good choice for a general-purpose lab scope.
Back to top
PhilGood
Thu Jul 12 2012, 12:10PM
PhilGood Registered Member #3806 Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
Oh, true... I didn't notice the 5a22n has such a high gain.

That might also explain the reasonable price of this hard to sell unit.
Back to top
PhilGood
Thu Jul 12 2012, 06:43PM
PhilGood Registered Member #3806 Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
For the same price, would you rather get a 465, a 475, a 2213 or a 2225 ?

Assuming they are all in perfect working condition and good cosmetic condition.

PS: Sorry for the double post, but I'm about to buy a scope on Ebay, and good opportunities sell quickly... thats why fast advices might help a lot. Thanks for your understanding smile
Back to top
Paul_J.
Thu Jul 12 2012, 11:26PM
Paul_J. Registered Member #5436 Joined: Sun Jun 24 2012, 01:44AM
Location:
Posts: 39
Hi,


However , the first generation 465s have been around since the late 60s, so they might not be as reliable as you would expect if it's all original. I'm not too sure, but I'm pretty sure at least some of the transistors were germanium.
Back to top
PhilGood
Fri Jul 13 2012, 11:56PM
PhilGood Registered Member #3806 Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
Paul_J. wrote ...

Hi,

However , the first generation 465s have been around since the late 60s, so they might not be as reliable as you would expect if it's all original. I'm not too sure, but I'm pretty sure at least some of the transistors were germanium.
Thanks Paul_J for the comment.

This is an important aspect I have not considered so far, but I understand a 40yo equipment might have defective/prone to failure components leading to a loss of accuracy in measurements.

I had a look a Tek scopes on ebay.com, and I would say there are two kinds of offers:

#1: "as is", "powers up", "good condition", etc... offers

#2: Fully reconditioned and calibrated equipment, that cost x3 more than #1

I now realize I might have to spend a lot more than I thought initially for a decent analog scope, even if it's a 30-40yo model like the 465/475 series.

Now my question is : can you get a decent scope that can be used for serious work from a #1 kind offer ? Or is it highly recommended to buy an old scope from a #2 kind offer ?
Back to top
Ash Small
Sat Jul 14 2012, 07:06AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
You 'can' get a good 'scope from a #1, but it will always be a gamble. I do this a lot, trying to 'read between the lines'. Often the people selling no nothing about 'scopes, so they can't test properly, etc.

Obviously, paying three times more for a 'guarranteed' 'scope has some advantages, though.

Most sellers will accept returns, so it may not be as much of a gamble as you might think. It 'is' possible to get a bargain.

Personally, I'd buy a #1 and test it with a sig. gen, etc. You'd still have enough money left to buy two more #1's if necessary, but that choice is up to you.

Even a #2 could fail after a short period of time, especially if mis-used.

(As I said in a previous post, I bought a cheap old analogue 'scope with no IC's partly in case I blew it up due to my ignorance. I wouldn't want to deatroy an expensive 'scope building my first project using it, but others may have different opinions.)
Back to top
first  2 3 4 5 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.