If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #3806
Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
I read many topics on seeedstudio forum in the Tech Support >> DSO Quad section
This (and many of the posts in this thread) gave me some understanding of why it is so hard for a digital scope to behave close to an analog one.
I'm definitly going to buy an analog scope as my first one.
I think a digital scope might be a good choice for a 2nd scope, after comparing many models, it seems 500$ is the minimal price to get something decent.
Registered Member #3806
Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
I was seriously considering buying the 5441 :
But there might be a big problem with this scope, because of the 5A22N modules that have a bandwith of only 1MHz ! 5a22n user manual:
I really don't get why Tek made a module with such a low bandwith for a mainframe that has a capability of 50+ MHz ... ???
I could try to find 5a48 dual trace amplifier modules, they have a bandwith of 50MHz , but there aren't many available, and they are all sold "as is"...
______________________
I found a very nice gallery of Tektronix old models. It provides descriptions and pictures of circuitry for many old scopes and plugins. The site also features an HP gallery and many other brands misc test equipments. Repair instructions for some models.
Registered Member #30
Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
I think the 5441 and 5A22 would normally be used for applications like looking at ECGs in a biology lab. They have very high gain (the knob goes down to microvolts per div) and the low bandwidth is a necessary consequence of the high gain.
Not really a good choice for a general-purpose lab scope.
Registered Member #3806
Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
For the same price, would you rather get a 465, a 475, a 2213 or a 2225 ?
Assuming they are all in perfect working condition and good cosmetic condition.
PS: Sorry for the double post, but I'm about to buy a scope on Ebay, and good opportunities sell quickly... thats why fast advices might help a lot. Thanks for your understanding
Registered Member #5436
Joined: Sun Jun 24 2012, 01:44AM
Location:
Posts: 39
Hi,
However , the first generation 465s have been around since the late 60s, so they might not be as reliable as you would expect if it's all original. I'm not too sure, but I'm pretty sure at least some of the transistors were germanium.
Registered Member #3806
Joined: Sat Apr 02 2011, 09:20PM
Location: France
Posts: 259
Paul_J. wrote ...
Hi,
However , the first generation 465s have been around since the late 60s, so they might not be as reliable as you would expect if it's all original. I'm not too sure, but I'm pretty sure at least some of the transistors were germanium.
Thanks Paul_J for the comment.
This is an important aspect I have not considered so far, but I understand a 40yo equipment might have defective/prone to failure components leading to a loss of accuracy in measurements.
I had a look a Tek scopes on ebay.com, and I would say there are two kinds of offers:
#2: Fully reconditioned and calibrated equipment, that cost x3 more than #1
I now realize I might have to spend a lot more than I thought initially for a decent analog scope, even if it's a 30-40yo model like the 465/475 series.
Now my question is : can you get a decent scope that can be used for serious work from a #1 kind offer ? Or is it highly recommended to buy an old scope from a #2 kind offer ?
Registered Member #3414
Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
You 'can' get a good 'scope from a #1, but it will always be a gamble. I do this a lot, trying to 'read between the lines'. Often the people selling no nothing about 'scopes, so they can't test properly, etc.
Obviously, paying three times more for a 'guarranteed' 'scope has some advantages, though.
Most sellers will accept returns, so it may not be as much of a gamble as you might think. It 'is' possible to get a bargain.
Personally, I'd buy a #1 and test it with a sig. gen, etc. You'd still have enough money left to buy two more #1's if necessary, but that choice is up to you.
Even a #2 could fail after a short period of time, especially if mis-used.
(As I said in a previous post, I bought a cheap old analogue 'scope with no IC's partly in case I blew it up due to my ignorance. I wouldn't want to deatroy an expensive 'scope building my first project using it, but others may have different opinions.)
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.