Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 29
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Sync (33)
Grant-ZA (58)
FreakyG (56)
brtaman (38)


Next birthdays
04/22 Sync (33)
04/22 Grant-ZA (58)
04/22 FreakyG (56)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

A device which can be used as a sonic weapon is being deployed in London for the Olympics.

 1 2 3 4 
Move Thread LAN_403
Nik
Sun May 13 2012, 09:53PM
Nik Registered Member #53 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:31AM
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 638
It's better off that they have something ready then not. Two years ago there was a nonsense G20 protest in Toronto (next city over to me) the police were told not to use the sound crowd control device and basically to go easy on the protesters. There was looting, arson and millions in damaged property. Had they fired up the "sound cannon" (what the very bias local media called it) I'll bet it would have been a completely different story.

Provided it is only used in case of an emergency what's the problem with being prepared? It seems like people are itchy to protest and mob at the drop of a hat lately, it doesn't do a think for their "cause" and costs money to people who aren't involved.
Back to top
Ash Small
Sun May 13 2012, 09:59PM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Nik wrote ...

It's better off that they have something ready then not. Two years ago there was a nonsense G20 protest in Toronto (next city over to me) the police were told not to use the sound crowd control device and basically to go easy on the protesters. There was looting, arson and millions in damaged property. Had they fired up the "sound cannon" (what the very bias local media called it) I'll bet it would have been a completely different story.

Provided it is only used in case of an emergency what's the problem with being prepared? It seems like people are itchy to protest and mob at the drop of a hat lately, it doesn't do a think for their "cause" and costs money to people who aren't involved.

This is the kind of thing that could 'trigger' a riot in this country.

We had riots (looting, etc) lasr summer in protest at 'heavy handed' tactics employed by police.
Back to top
Nik
Sun May 13 2012, 10:28PM
Nik Registered Member #53 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 04:31AM
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 638
Not to troll but protesting "heavy handed" responses to protests is a pretty stupid idea. It doesn't make it right for authorities to over react but when its known that they do its better to take things on in a way that is not is not likely to end in rioting. In the US its you can buy some political power but there are limits up here as to how much money you can "donate" to a politician. I'm not sure how it works for you guys in the UK.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon May 14 2012, 08:15AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Ash Small wrote ...

This is the kind of thing that could 'trigger' a riot in this country.

We had riots (looting, etc) lasr summer in protest at 'heavy handed' tactics employed by police.

Nah, the London riots got out of control because the police weren't heavy-handed enough.
Back to top
Thomas W
Mon May 14 2012, 09:12AM
Thomas W Registered Member #3324 Joined: Sun Oct 17 2010, 06:57PM
Location:
Posts: 1276
I for one dont see any issue in military power around the area, its there if its needed, some people say that if the missiles were used it could kill many lifes stopping a plane crashing into the olympics but may lifes will be lost if it did...
Back to top
Ash Small
Mon May 14 2012, 09:23AM
Ash Small Registered Member #3414 Joined: Sun Nov 14 2010, 05:05PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4245
Steve Conner wrote ...


Nah, the London riots got out of control because the police weren't heavy-handed enough.

The riots were triggered after the police shot 'another' un-armed person in London. Roits don't start for no reason. They always occur as a response to 'something'. But I don't really want to get into a 'debate' on here about it, Steve.

I also understand that the protests in the US were peaceful until the police became 'heavy handed'.
Back to top
Chris Russell
Mon May 14 2012, 10:57AM
Chris Russell ... not Russel!
Registered Member #1 Joined: Thu Jan 26 2006, 12:18AM
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 1052
Ash Small wrote ...

Can you give me ONE example of where these weapons have been used in the context you describe, Chris? smile

Sure. Here's an article from 2004 detailing the deployment of sonic weapons to US troops in Iraq, reporting some initial use in Baghdad: Link2,2933,113096,00.html . Not sure how that changes anything: these are pretty brutal weapons meant to force crowds of people into compliance through pain, similar to tear gas, microwave pain beams, or just good old fashioned skirmish lines of batons and tasers. As our police forces become more militarized, and our militaries are used as police forces in occupied nations, it should not be terribly surprising that there's starting to be a great deal of overlap in both the weapons and tactics used. It's just one symptom of a larger and disturbing trend, IMO.
Back to top
Nicko
Mon May 14 2012, 11:08AM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
Ash Small wrote ...

Steve Conner wrote ...


Nah, the London riots got out of control because the police weren't heavy-handed enough.

The riots were triggered after the police shot 'another' un-armed person in London. Roits don't start for no reason. They always occur as a response to 'something'. But I don't really want to get into a 'debate' on here about it, Steve.
You probably don't want to get into a debate about this as your "facts" are very questionable. The IPCC (Independent Police Complaint Commission) investigated the shooting (as they do all instances where a police firearm is discharged) and:

The IPCC stated that a loaded Bruni BBM blank-firing pistol converted to fire live rounds was recovered from the scene. The IPCC had commissioned tests on the pistol by the Forensic Science Service and had received advice that it was an illegal firearm.[3][9][10][11][12] The gun was wrapped in a sock, a practice allegedly used to avoid leaving evidence if it was used.[13] The IPCC announced on 9 August that there was no evidence that the gun had been fired, that this had not been ruled out and further tests were being conducted.[3][14][15] On 18 November 2011 it was announced that the IPCC was to investigate whether the same gun had been used in an earlier incident, on 29 July 2011, when a man was assaulted in Hackney.[16] Video and other evidence was obtained by the IPCC showing Duggan had obtained the firearm earlier in the day. His fingerprints were found on a cardboard box which appeared to have contained the gun when he collected it. The sock and gun were taken out of the box before Duggan was shot. His DNA and fingerprints were not recovered from the sock which wrapped the gun, nor from the weapon itself.[17]
To get all the quotes "[x]" have a look at the Wikipedia article for the primary sources. i.e. It's FAR from clear that he was unarmed at the time. Yes, the police were poor in the way they handled notifying his family, but I subscribe to the "cockup" rather than "conspiracy" theory, and whatever the sensitivities of that, it in no way excuses what followed.

The facts are that approximately 75% of the rioters arrested had a previous criminal record and 83% of them were already known to the police - this was criminal opportunism, not a political statement however expedient dressing up as such may be. See The Guardian and just about any other reputable paper from any side of the political spectrum...
Back to top
Steve Conner
Mon May 14 2012, 11:29AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Of course the other side in the debate simply claims that the IPCC are in cahoots with the police. frown

I noticed that the LRAD devices all feature a built-in ruggedised MP3 player. Ideal for blasting Ride of the Valkyries from your Bell Huey.

I don't think there's anything exotic about the LRAD technology. It would be quite feasible to build your own.
Back to top
Nicko
Mon May 14 2012, 12:26PM
Nicko Registered Member #1334 Joined: Tue Feb 19 2008, 04:37PM
Location: Nr. London, UK
Posts: 615
Steve Conner wrote ...
Of course the other side in the debate simply claims that the IPCC are in cahoots with the police. frown
That was a valid question 4 or 5 years ago but after a major revamp in 2008 it appears to have gone away, i.e. no further examples have been forthcoming.

To be frank, the police have an almost impossible job - whilst with the large number of officers, there are bound to be some rotten apples, the vast majority of officers try very hard to do a very difficult job - one that I certainly could never do.
Back to top
 1 2 3 4 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.