Welcome
Username or Email:

Password:


Missing Code




[ ]
[ ]
Online
  • Guests: 24
  • Members: 0
  • Newest Member: omjtest
  • Most ever online: 396
    Guests: 396, Members: 0 on 12 Jan : 12:51
Members Birthdays:
All today's birthdays', congrats!
Sync (33)
Grant-ZA (58)
FreakyG (56)
brtaman (38)


Next birthdays
04/22 Sync (33)
04/22 Grant-ZA (58)
04/22 FreakyG (56)
Contact
If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.


Special Thanks To:
  • Aaron Holmes
  • Aaron Wheeler
  • Adam Horden
  • Alan Scrimgeour
  • Andre
  • Andrew Haynes
  • Anonymous000
  • asabase
  • Austin Weil
  • barney
  • Barry
  • Bert Hickman
  • Bill Kukowski
  • Blitzorn
  • Brandon Paradelas
  • Bruce Bowling
  • BubeeMike
  • Byong Park
  • Cesiumsponge
  • Chris F.
  • Chris Hooper
  • Corey Worthington
  • Derek Woodroffe
  • Dalus
  • Dan Strother
  • Daniel Davis
  • Daniel Uhrenholt
  • datasheetarchive
  • Dave Billington
  • Dave Marshall
  • David F.
  • Dennis Rogers
  • drelectrix
  • Dr. John Gudenas
  • Dr. Spark
  • E.TexasTesla
  • eastvoltresearch
  • Eirik Taylor
  • Erik Dyakov
  • Erlend^SE
  • Finn Hammer
  • Firebug24k
  • GalliumMan
  • Gary Peterson
  • George Slade
  • GhostNull
  • Gordon Mcknight
  • Graham Armitage
  • Grant
  • GreySoul
  • Henry H
  • IamSmooth
  • In memory of Leo Powning
  • Jacob Cash
  • James Howells
  • James Pawson
  • Jeff Greenfield
  • Jeff Thomas
  • Jesse Frost
  • Jim Mitchell
  • jlr134
  • Joe Mastroianni
  • John Forcina
  • John Oberg
  • John Willcutt
  • Jon Newcomb
  • klugesmith
  • Leslie Wright
  • Lutz Hoffman
  • Mads Barnkob
  • Martin King
  • Mats Karlsson
  • Matt Gibson
  • Matthew Guidry
  • mbd
  • Michael D'Angelo
  • Mikkel
  • mileswaldron
  • mister_rf
  • Neil Foster
  • Nick de Smith
  • Nick Soroka
  • nicklenorp
  • Nik
  • Norman Stanley
  • Patrick Coleman
  • Paul Brodie
  • Paul Jordan
  • Paul Montgomery
  • Ped
  • Peter Krogen
  • Peter Terren
  • PhilGood
  • Richard Feldman
  • Robert Bush
  • Royce Bailey
  • Scott Fusare
  • Scott Newman
  • smiffy
  • Stella
  • Steven Busic
  • Steve Conner
  • Steve Jones
  • Steve Ward
  • Sulaiman
  • Thomas Coyle
  • Thomas A. Wallace
  • Thomas W
  • Timo
  • Torch
  • Ulf Jonsson
  • vasil
  • Vaxian
  • vladi mazzilli
  • wastehl
  • Weston
  • William Kim
  • William N.
  • William Stehl
  • Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Forums
4hv.org :: Forums :: General Chatting
« Previous topic | Next topic »   

Black boxes in cars

1 2 
Move Thread LAN_403
Conundrum
Thu Apr 19 2012, 07:03PM Print
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
Link2

I am aware this is somewhat off topic, but it does show how one "solution" to bad driving can create another problem (ie GPS blockers) which then allows the Government to make owning a schematic for any radio transmitter capable of blocking GPS devices an offence.
This is happening right now in the UK, if passed then it is likely that the Government will have yet another reason to harass innocent amateur radio enthusiasts/TCers, etc.

(minor edit, in my judgement this went a bit too far up the garden path)
Back to top
Mattski
Fri Apr 20 2012, 01:06AM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
Isn't jamming GPS already illegal? Why would vehicular black boxes change that? It's not even clear to me that the vehicular black boxes would include a GPS receiver, they're much more concerned about things like speed, acceleration, braking data, impact forces, etc.

I am way more concerned about the privacy issues here than about possible increased scrutiny of GPS jammers.

wrote ...
It also occurs to me that this would be an ideal way for the Government to get old cars off the roads without changing the law, by requiring a minimum specification for the boxes to work.
No box = no using the roads.
That's rarely (if ever) how it works with new vehicular standards. The old cars will be grandfathered in.
Back to top
Steve Conner
Fri Apr 20 2012, 08:06AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
Recently I was shopping for car insurance. The broker said that I might get lower premiums if I was prepared to have a tracking device installed in my car.

It wasn't clear if this was to track it when stolen, or to assess my driving habits and make sure I wasn't lying about mileage. Either way I said no thx.
Back to top
Avalanche
Fri Apr 20 2012, 11:47AM
Avalanche Registered Member #103 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:16PM
Location: Derby, UK
Posts: 845
My Boss's son has one of those tracking devices, and it saved hundreds on the insurance. It tracks driving habits, so along with the GPS it knows if he is breaking the speed limit, etc. Every month you're awarded 'points' for good driving habits, which I guess go towards lowering the premium.

Car insurance is so expensive in the UK that this is becoming pretty much the only way forward for young drivers now, if I was 18 again I wouldn't be able to afford it without the tracker.
Back to top
Conundrum
Fri Apr 20 2012, 06:07PM
Conundrum Registered Member #96 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 05:37PM
Location: CI, Earth
Posts: 4062
This is my point. People are willing to give up their right to privacy in exchange for being able to drive.
The police state is here folks, leave your rights at the door.

Ironically a device designed to mess up GPS lock but with only a 2" range would be undetectable and if calibrated with a range of false locations and speeds to get around clever software the purpose of the device would be negated without affecting the safety functions.
I am reluctant to give further details but it involves using a ceramic chip antenna as the rebroadcaster element as it is range limited by design.

-A
#include "£0.02.h"
Back to top
Bored Chemist
Fri Apr 20 2012, 06:15PM
Bored Chemist Registered Member #193 Joined: Fri Feb 17 2006, 07:04AM
Location: sheffield
Posts: 1022
They are giving up their right to break the law in order to get cheaper insurance. Since that means they are less likely to kill me I'm not to upset about that.
Anyway, since running any sort of unlicensed transmitter has been illegal in the UK since 1949, the point about the jammers is pretty much moot.
Link2

The invasion of privacy is a bad thing, but lets not muddle it up with other things, because that just muddies the waters.
Back to top
Dr. Slack
Fri Apr 20 2012, 06:17PM
Dr. Slack Registered Member #72 Joined: Thu Feb 09 2006, 08:29AM
Location: UK St. Albans
Posts: 1659
Some friends of ours have just got an insurance black box, to keep the cost of insuring their 18 year old son down. However, whereas they used to agree to differ when it came to driving styles, in the spirit of marital harmony, they can't do that now. The Father always gets a clean report when he comes back after a drive. The Mother, no matter how careful she tries to be, is always criticised by the report for braking/cornering/accelerating too hard. The strain of him not saying "I always said you were a bad driver" is taking its toll.
Back to top
Mattski
Fri Apr 20 2012, 08:10PM
Mattski Registered Member #1792 Joined: Fri Oct 31 2008, 08:12PM
Location: University of California
Posts: 527
People have a right to give up their privacy in exchange for lower insurance rates. This isn't the govt invading your privacy, it's the insurance companies. I'd have a problem with insurance companies requiring black boxes, but by not using a black box there is less known about you, thus investment risk is increased and your premium could be higher as a result.

I'm pretty sure these black boxes rely on speedometer data and IMU's, not GPS. It's easier to get speed and acceleration from the car's speedometer and accelerometers than it is from GPS. Spoofing the GPS is possible, though not particularly easy, and could get you in a lot of trouble. If you're concerned about hiding your location just block the antenna, or better, don't opt-in to a black box.
Back to top
testtest
Fri Apr 20 2012, 11:06PM
testtest Registered Member #3271 Joined: Mon Oct 04 2010, 02:29AM
Location: Canada
Posts: 159
many of these black boxes that I read about seem to plug on the OBDII diagnostic plug in the car. Therefore easy to manipulate the data with a dongle before it gets to the (presumably sealed) box. I would assume it is not fixed permanently since mechanics and emission testing need access anyway??? As far as GPS is concerned if you want to hide use the proverbial tinfoil hat: shape an Al foil cap over the antenna before you reach the critical destination....
Back to top
Steve Conner
Sat Apr 21 2012, 06:04AM
Steve Conner Registered Member #30 Joined: Fri Feb 03 2006, 10:52AM
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 6706
The problem with spoofing your black box is when you crash and want to submit an insurance claim. If the black box data says the car is in the car park at Tesco, but it's actually wrapped round a tree on the Nurburgring, you have some explaining to do.
Back to top
1 2 

Moderator(s): Chris Russell, Noelle, Alex, Tesladownunder, Dave Marshall, Dave Billington, Bjørn, Steve Conner, Wolfram, Kizmo, Mads Barnkob

Go to:

Powered by e107 Forum System
 
Legal Information
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.