If you need assistance, please send an email to forum at 4hv dot org. To ensure your email is not marked as spam, please include the phrase "4hv help" in the subject line. You can also find assistance via IRC, at irc.shadowworld.net, room #hvcomm.
Support 4hv.org!
Donate:
4hv.org is hosted on a dedicated server. Unfortunately, this server costs and we rely on the help of site members to keep 4hv.org running. Please consider donating. We will place your name on the thanks list and you'll be helping to keep 4hv.org alive and free for everyone. Members whose names appear in red bold have donated recently. Green bold denotes those who have recently donated to keep the server carbon neutral.
Special Thanks To:
Aaron Holmes
Aaron Wheeler
Adam Horden
Alan Scrimgeour
Andre
Andrew Haynes
Anonymous000
asabase
Austin Weil
barney
Barry
Bert Hickman
Bill Kukowski
Blitzorn
Brandon Paradelas
Bruce Bowling
BubeeMike
Byong Park
Cesiumsponge
Chris F.
Chris Hooper
Corey Worthington
Derek Woodroffe
Dalus
Dan Strother
Daniel Davis
Daniel Uhrenholt
datasheetarchive
Dave Billington
Dave Marshall
David F.
Dennis Rogers
drelectrix
Dr. John Gudenas
Dr. Spark
E.TexasTesla
eastvoltresearch
Eirik Taylor
Erik Dyakov
Erlend^SE
Finn Hammer
Firebug24k
GalliumMan
Gary Peterson
George Slade
GhostNull
Gordon Mcknight
Graham Armitage
Grant
GreySoul
Henry H
IamSmooth
In memory of Leo Powning
Jacob Cash
James Howells
James Pawson
Jeff Greenfield
Jeff Thomas
Jesse Frost
Jim Mitchell
jlr134
Joe Mastroianni
John Forcina
John Oberg
John Willcutt
Jon Newcomb
klugesmith
Leslie Wright
Lutz Hoffman
Mads Barnkob
Martin King
Mats Karlsson
Matt Gibson
Matthew Guidry
mbd
Michael D'Angelo
Mikkel
mileswaldron
mister_rf
Neil Foster
Nick de Smith
Nick Soroka
nicklenorp
Nik
Norman Stanley
Patrick Coleman
Paul Brodie
Paul Jordan
Paul Montgomery
Ped
Peter Krogen
Peter Terren
PhilGood
Richard Feldman
Robert Bush
Royce Bailey
Scott Fusare
Scott Newman
smiffy
Stella
Steven Busic
Steve Conner
Steve Jones
Steve Ward
Sulaiman
Thomas Coyle
Thomas A. Wallace
Thomas W
Timo
Torch
Ulf Jonsson
vasil
Vaxian
vladi mazzilli
wastehl
Weston
William Kim
William N.
William Stehl
Wesley Venis
The aforementioned have contributed financially to the continuing triumph of 4hv.org. They are deserving of my most heartfelt thanks.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
Antonio wrote ...
(If I look for Atlas and sparkgap I find the post above...) From the discussion above I found several ways to measure DC high voltage, that I started to describe in the page that I posted. The last method, that works surprisingly well, is the old pair of pith balls. I even found a good formula relating voltage and separation of the balls. It's a common basic Physics exercise, but strangely recent texts don't try to find that relation.
On your page, shouldnt it be F/m=tan theta, not W for wheight? arnt mass and wheight different?
Registered Member #2727
Joined: Tue Mar 09 2010, 02:39PM
Location: Montevideo - Uruguay
Posts: 33
Hi Patrick, Antonio and all people. I'm sorry but I'm not sure of understand at all the spark gap voltage measure for short gap distances. I plotted the aproximated function that Antonio propose for short gaps end has found that the gap value for 30 kV/cm is situed in the vecinity of d= 1 cm far away of short gap range. My doubt is about what to do in between short gaps (d<<R) and normal gaps, because I have a step in kv/cm not covered for the initial formulae nor the short gap breakdown voltage aproximation. For the record I write here the scilab script ussed for plot the graph exposed.
// The formula for sphere gaps can be used for small gaps if the 30000 is replaced by
// the value obtained in this way divided by the distance d, but the formula above is
// enough for R>>d.
//
function E = Vbreakdown(d,p,T)
// p = pressure in Torr (mm Hg),
// d = distance in cm,
// T = Temperature in Kelvins
// Vbreakdown in kV
x = 293 * p * d / (760 * T);
E = 24.22 * x + 6.08 * x.^0.5;
return E;
endfunction
function Vbrk=SparkGap(d)
// d separation in cm
R=3/4*2.54; // ball radius cm
E=30; // kV/cm break down voltage
Vbrk = E*4000*d/(d/R+1+sqrt((d/R+1)^2+8))
return Vbrk
endfunction
d=0.02:0.02:2; // only a list of d separation values in cm
E=Vbreakdown(d,760,273+25); // respective values in kV
plot(d,E./d)
set(gca(),"grid",[1 1]); // draw a grid in both axes
xtitle('Breakdown electric field ~Vs~ separation d','d [cm]','E/d [kV/cm]');
Registered Member #834
Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
AleSeg wrote ...
Hi Patrick, Antonio and all people. I'm sorry but I'm not sure of understand at all the spark gap voltage measure for short gap distances. I plotted the aproximated function that Antonio propose for short gaps end has found that the gap value for 30 kV/cm is situed in the vecinity of d= 1 cm far away of short gap range. My doubt is about what to do in between short gaps (d<<R) and normal gaps, because I have a step in kv/cm not covered for the initial formulae nor the short gap breakdown voltage aproximation. For the record I write here the scilab script ussed for plot the graph exposed.
Your plot is correct. The idea is to calculate E using the formula for it and then use the calculated E in the other formula. The second formula reduces to V=Ed at short distances. There is a better approximation for E for long gaps in my web page, where E depends on the radius of the balls and not on the gap distance.
Registered Member #2431
Joined: Tue Oct 13 2009, 09:47PM
Location: Chico, CA. USA
Posts: 5639
teravolt wrote ...
Hi Patrick, how much voltage do you want to hold off and how much power do you want to switch? have you thought about using UV to trigger it
i just want to measure, like my oscope probe and for the physical seperation of my lifter wires. I think ishould use a 10M ohm resistor to limit some of the spark energy though.
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
A bit of a digression in terms of gap scale, but added here for the sake of interest and completion:
"...there is a widespread misconception that there exists a minimum breakdown voltage for air gaps and that if the spacing of a device is scaled-down below ~ 5 μm then breakdown will not occur.
It is important to understand that electrical current can result from mechanisms other than the Townsend avalanche within an ionized gas, and that these other mechanisms are not considered in the theory behind the Paschen curve. Thus, while it is true to conclude from the Paschen curve that gaseous breakdown at 1 atmosphere pressure does not occur below ~ 360V, it is false to conclude that breakdown of any kind does not occur below 360V.
The other mechanisms for prebreakdown current production at a small gap spacing are the closely related phenomena of electron field emission and tunneling. For electric fields across gaps less than 5 μm, the electric field becomes quite large and electrons can tunnel through the deformed surface potential barrier. This is called field emission. Electrons from field emission are one reason why breakdown and sparks occur in a vacuum, which of course is not possible if one only considers the Townsend Avalanche mechanisms for gas ionization used to generate the Paschen curve."
These authors report a "steep decline in breakdown voltage for a gap spacing less than 5 μm."
Al Wallash and Larry Levit Electrical breakdown and ESD phenomena for devices with nanometer-to-micron gaps
Registered Member #834
Joined: Tue Jun 12 2007, 10:57PM
Location: Brazil
Posts: 644
I had seen this paper. I am not sure about its correctness. The experimental gaps are not in air between flat surfaces or are not precise, and the plots are confuse. For example, they show the 30 kV/cm value going to a 5um gap, what is clearly wrong. There is significant investigation (or there should be) about the actual behavior of very small gaps today, due to the interest in MEMS devices, and these same devices may be a form to build precise experimental setups to investigate what really happens. The "Paschen curve" comes from works in the XIX century, and it's not clear if it was really verified carefully (or just I have not seen any recent confirmation). Most of the studies about spark gaps are with quite large gaps, with interest in the protection and measurement of electric power systems, with many-kV voltages and many-cm gaps. It's difficult to find careful, confirmed, studies of um gaps, if any one has been made.
Registered Member #543
Joined: Tue Feb 20 2007, 04:26PM
Location: UK
Posts: 4992
@ Antonio, I agree that a discharge in air at atmospheric pressure across a surface could give very different results to an experiment where air was the only dielectric involved. More will be discovered soon, I think.
Anyway, I had better take myself and my submicron gaps out of poor Patrick's thread!
This site is powered by e107, which is released under the GNU GPL License. All work on this site, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License. By submitting any information to this site, you agree that anything submitted will be so licensed. Please read our Disclaimer and Policies page for information on your rights and responsibilities regarding this site.